Sadly, it's not. When it happened to Mick, he went straight to Linda McMahan, asking if he could sue. She explained to him that all they did was "misrepresent the facts." Since all the footage they used was from the same conversation. Just like in print when you misquote someone by skipping ahead.
For instance when ever you see bad movies, yet their trailers and posters will have review snips from various papers and critic that are surrounded by "...'s"
Such as "...An overload of action..." might be from a review that really said, "The storyline and acting are absolutely terrible, and it looks like the producers tried to mask it under an overload of action that it stupid and pointless."
This is why the WWE has learned to use thier own cameramen to tape the interview tapings, just so they can protect themselves from the media trying to change thier words, or people's answers. That's why you can see the full version of John Cena's interview, becasue the WWE covered thier asses.
|