There was a plan involving the Zombie apocalypse from like a year ago. It had something to do with holing up at Cabela's/Bass Pro or Wal Mart or some similar place, as it stands now, I'm shacking up, I've got enough ammunition to last me a while, but not the sustenance, so I may have to rethink my plans, I COULD supply the armament for a small group (about 10-15, more if I were to give people blades after I run out of firearms to hand out), or I could be dead before I even meet up with anyone...who knows, but in that case I give you permission to raid my stocks, just give me a viking funeral, pyre and all.

In case of Zombies, this is my loadout...well I'm missing a few things, like my AR15, but I don't have it handy so this is what you get. REVEL IN MY PREPAREDNESS:

It's 00 Buck, I'd prefer if I had #1 buck, but that shit is hard to find around these parts, and I keep a couple slugs in my Mossberg's side saddle, but as you can probably tell, this isn't me Mossberg. I only ever used turkey loads/bird shot for clay pigeons, don't have much use for it.

KyriosExousia wrote:

I am slightly impressed, saying the least... The handgun's gonna be less useful against zombies though, unless the "zombies" are just humans with some crazy disease, because we all know zombies need there heads destroyed to die... : P ...and I'm not sayin this as a knowitall loser or anything, it was just something from a zombie survival guide....

You mean THIS Zombie survival guide? (and that's an inert grenade if you haven't guessed)



It's good overall but there are some inaccuracies.

From some blog:

"The first bit of bad info that I must correct is the author's straight out and foolish dismissal of the AR-15 style rifle. He uses the weapon system as an example of the absolute "worst" in a rifle, though most of his criticisms are unfounded. Here are a few examples.

"both difficult to clean and prone to jamming"
WRONG. The AR-15 is far from "hard to clean"; it can be disassembled easily for cleaning. When maintained at all, it is a very reliable platform.

"Adjusting the sight, something that must be done every time a target shifts its range, requires the use of a nail, ballpoint pen, or similar device."
WRONG. It is the front sight that requires a tool to adjust (you can just use the tip of a 5.56 cartridge to do so). After an initial "sight in" for a new rifle, you should not need to adjust the front sight again, let alone when a target is moving towards you. That's completely retarded. I actually don't know of any rifles off hand that have very easily adjustable front sights, let alone the AK-47, which the author promotes as the "best" assault style rifle.

"The delicate plastic stock of the M16A1 obviates bayonet use, and attempting to use it as such you would risk shattering the hollow, spring-loaded stock."
WRONG. First off, using a bayonet doesn't have a whole lot to do with the weapon's stock. The bayonet attaches to the front of the weapon, not the back. Yes, a buttstroke from the plastic stock of an M16/AR-15 will not do much damage to an enemy, but a buttstroke from nearly any modern weapon will do little to destroy an attacking zombie's brain. Finally, the "hollow" stock is made from steel and not likely to "shatter" any time soon.

Handguns are an afterthought.
FOOLISH. The author's discussion of handguns is a woefully short afterthought. Basically, his view boils down to "you won't hit anything, but because they're light, you should carry one anyways. Wrong. When your primary weapon (your rifle) runs dry and zombies are only a few steps away, transitioning to a sidearm will always be faster than reloading your rifle. Accuracy with a handgun requires more practice, but headshots are certainly possible, especially at the up-close range of the situations you would use it in. A secondary firearm is an essential tool for every undead fighter, and disregarding its importance is as brain dead as any necrotic zombie."