| Author |
Message |
Spanish Meatloaf
Title: Denim Clad Road Warrior
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 522
|
I just upgraded to windows 7 yesterday, it took only an hour and none of my old stuff was deleted like I thought it was going to be (just a common misconception). It runs faster, better, and prettier. I've always loved the Aero theme. And they've kept it. The GUI is much simpler too. My favorite part however is that they finally included mouse wheel zoom in paint! Even though I use the GIMP usually. Anyone else gotten 7 or thinking about getting it?
|
|
|
  |
|
Knyte
2010 SLF Tag Champ*
Title: Curator Of The VGM
Joined: Nov 01 2006
Location: Here I am.
Posts: 6749
|
I think we had a pretty good discussion about this before. There are a few 7 users here, including myself.
|
|
|
   |
|
SoldierHawk
Moderator
Title: Warrior-Poet
Joined: Jan 15 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6113
|
I have yet to upgrade because from what I understand, older games like MechCommander and Starcraft can't run on a 64-bit system. So I'm hanging on as long as I can to avoid losing my ability to play them.
|
| William Shakespeare wrote: |
| Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none. |
|
|
    |
|
Ermac
Title: Thread Killer
Joined: Aug 04 2008
Location: Outworld
Posts: 1512
|
| SoldierHawk wrote: |
| I have yet to upgrade because from what I understand, older games like MechCommander and Starcraft can't run on a 64-bit system. So I'm hanging on as long as I can to avoid losing my ability to play them. |
Win7 is also comes in 32 bit.....
64 bit is just for addressing more than 4GB's of RAM, that's pretty much it. Most games wont use all 4 anyway(max of 2.4GB in my experience) and ur FPS are always about the same in 64 vs 32.
|
|
|
   |
|
Berserk007
Title: Freelance Skull Grinder
Joined: Aug 21 2009
Posts: 293
|
my starcraft runs fine in 64bit just a FYI. Yeah I have been nothing but happy with win 7
|
 For my confession they burned me with fire and found I was for endurance made. - The Arabian Nights |
|
  |
|
Chile Guy
Title: Token Latino Otaku
Joined: Apr 14 2008
Location: Fortaleza, Brazil
Posts: 479
|
My laptop came with Windows 7. Shit's so cash...
Unfortunately I got the bundled Starter Edition, meaning that some of the best visuals of the OS were not included. Bummer... but it works fine, so it's okay.
|
|
|
  |
|
Ice2SeeYou
Title: Sexual Tyrannosaurus
Joined: Sep 28 2008
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 1761
|
My new comp has 7. I like it, but then I never understood why so many people disliked Vista. Worked fine for me.
|
 Sydlexia.com - Where miserable bastards meet to call each other retards. |
|
  |
|
Ghandi
Title: Alexz Aficionado
Joined: May 21 2008
Posts: 2889
|
Windows 7 is miles better than Vista, but then again everything is better than Vista  I did the upgrade too.
|
|
|
   |
|
Chile Guy
Title: Token Latino Otaku
Joined: Apr 14 2008
Location: Fortaleza, Brazil
Posts: 479
|
Vista is this generation's ME, as it seems.
I cannot tell, I jumped to 7 right from XP anyways.
|
|
|
  |
|
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 11244
|
I was an early adopter of 7. Once it hit RTM, it became my default OS. I dealt with any and all problems that it brought. I did the same with Vista, XP, 2000, ME, 98SE, etc.
I can tell you without a question of a doubt that Vista had more compatibility issues than 7 because developers didn't develop for it. They didn't see any compelling reason to. However over the next few years they did make sure that everything ran on both Vista and XP. As it turns out Windows 7 is just Vista with a point release update. It makes sense that everything feels better on 7 because Vista has been updated to be better. They slapped a new style on top and fixed the task bar. Ta Da!
The truth is, Vista was terrible when it first came out. SP2 isn't that bad. SP3, aka Windows 7 has been great, and Windows 7 SP1 will be just slightly better.
No matter how you want to look at it, most applications should run fine on a Windows 7 64-bit system. In a worst case scenario you can download a virtual environment and run a 32 bit OS to make the program happy.
|
|
|
   |
|
Ermac
Title: Thread Killer
Joined: Aug 04 2008
Location: Outworld
Posts: 1512
|
| GPFontaine wrote: |
I was an early adopter of 7. Once it hit RTM, it became my default OS. I dealt with any and all problems that it brought. I did the same with Vista, XP, 2000, ME, 98SE, etc.
I can tell you without a question of a doubt that Vista had more compatibility issues than 7 because developers didn't develop for it. They didn't see any compelling reason to. However over the next few years they did make sure that everything ran on both Vista and XP. As it turns out Windows 7 is just Vista with a point release update. It makes sense that everything feels better on 7 because Vista has been updated to be better. They slapped a new style on top and fixed the task bar. Ta Da!
The truth is, Vista was terrible when it first came out. SP2 isn't that bad. SP3, aka Windows 7 has been great, and Windows 7 SP1 will be just slightly better.
No matter how you want to look at it, most applications should run fine on a Windows 7 64-bit system. In a worst case scenario you can download a virtual environment and run a 32 bit OS to make the program happy. |
Good post.
BTW, if you want a free version of Windows Server 2008 r2 and u are a student with an .edu address go to this site
https://www.dreamspark.com/PRODUCTS/Product.aspx?ProductId=17
it only takes about an hour to convert it to win7 settings
http://www.win2008r2workstation.com/
|
|
|
   |
|
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
Posts: 3495
|
| Chile Guy wrote: |
| Vista is this generation's ME, as it seems. |
I noticed. I guess this makes 7 the new 2000.
|
 I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can. |
|
   |
|
Guile
Title: Sonic Boom!
Joined: Apr 21 2010
Posts: 30
|
I am using Windows 7.
I love it so much more than vista + xp
nuff' said
|
|
|
  |
|
pineapple
Joined: Nov 11 2009
Location: Cajun Country
Posts: 1511
|
|
  |
|
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 11244
|
| The-Excel wrote: |
| Chile Guy wrote: |
| Vista is this generation's ME, as it seems. |
I noticed. I guess this makes 7 the new 2000. |
I'd say it is more in line with XP. It is the first major release of an OS that is an upgrade of a previous OS rather than a fresh start. In some ways it is more similar to ME than people give it credit for.
Of course your statement is about the product's reception and usability, while mine is on its version and progression path.
The reason why it isn't like 2000 is because Windows 2k was designed for business use. That was it. Windows 7 is designed for home and business use. This makes it hard to directly compare to any OS that wasn't designed for equal purposes.
| pineapple wrote: |
| Nah, XP is the best. |
It was very good, but at 9 years old, it's tits are sagging now and some perky ones would be much appreciated.
|
|
|
   |
|
pineapple
Joined: Nov 11 2009
Location: Cajun Country
Posts: 1511
|
9 years old? Wow, that's amazing. I still love it and will never switch.
|
|
|
  |
|
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 11244
|
| pineapple wrote: |
| 9 years old? Wow, that's amazing. I still love it and will never switch. |
You sound like Syd and his twisted devotion to IE.
|
|
|
   |
|
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
Posts: 3495
|
All of the computers at my school still use XP. I suspect it will be around for years to come despite the lack of support from Microsoft.
|
 I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can. |
|
   |
|
Hacker
Banned
Joined: Sep 13 2008
Posts: 3129
|
| GPFontaine wrote: |
| pineapple wrote: |
| 9 years old? Wow, that's amazing. I still love it and will never switch. |
You sound like Syd and his twisted devotion to IE. |
What about his twisted obsession with making XP look like 95?
And my laptop (well...desktop now since the screen broke. I plugged it into a CRT moniter) came with windows 7 home premium and I love it. It runs smoother than XP or vista.
which is expected from my systems 3 gigs of ram and a 64 bit operating system
|
|
|
  |
|
Ermac
Title: Thread Killer
Joined: Aug 04 2008
Location: Outworld
Posts: 1512
|
| Hacker wrote: |
| GPFontaine wrote: |
| pineapple wrote: |
| 9 years old? Wow, that's amazing. I still love it and will never switch. |
You sound like Syd and his twisted devotion to IE. |
What about his twisted obsession with making XP look like 95? |
Part of Syd's genius is tied to his eccentricity
|
|
|
   |
|
Spanish Meatloaf
Title: Denim Clad Road Warrior
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 522
|
| GPFontaine wrote: |
You sound like Syd and his twisted devotion to IE. |
I never liked IE, the only people who I know that still use it tell me to fuck off when I say we should use chrome because it's faster... I'm not saying that syd is that much of o blatant asshole though, but I am saying that N IS FUCKING AWESOME!
|
|
|
  |
|
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
Posts: 3495
|
| Hacker wrote: |
| GPFontaine wrote: |
| pineapple wrote: |
| 9 years old? Wow, that's amazing. I still love it and will never switch. |
You sound like Syd and his twisted devotion to IE. |
What about his twisted obsession with making XP look like 95? |
At least the 95 style doesn't have rounded corners on the windows making it possible to accidentally close the window behind the one you meant to close.
|
 I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can. |
|
   |
|
|
|