Science is stupid.

Because of science, we have like 8,000,000 different variants of CSI.

Because of science, it takes 5 years to make an FPS because the programmers want the blood spray that exits a zombie when you shoot it in the head to be 100% realistic.

I mean seriously. Aside from renewable energy sources, computers, cars, television, video games, and medecine, what has science done for us?

Chrisby wrote:

What bullshit. Far as I'm concerned, Pluto will always be a planet. Because I am stubborn. Oh and I'm back.

Welcome back!

There's no reason Pluto can't be a planet though. As someone said, it's an arbitrary designation. When someone claims that the Earth is flat, that's harmful because it's dangerously inaccurate information. If I want to argue that Pluto is a planet, I can do so because whether or not Pluto is a planet is based on semantics, not science.

Scientists challenge Pluto's demotion
By Andy Sullivan

Hundreds of U.S. scientists have challenged a recent decision by an international astronomy group to strip Pluto of its planetary status with a petition rejecting its definition of what constitutes a planet.

The astronomical insurrection shows that debate is likely to continue over the status of the icy rock at the edge of the solar system that was considered the ninth planet until a vote last week by the International Astronomical Union.

Petition organizer Alan Stern said the union's decision was driven by politics, not science.

"The IAU can say the sky is green all day long and that doesn't make it so," said Stern, a planetary scientist at the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado.

"The IAU created a definition which is technically flawed, linguistically flawed and scientifically embarrassing," Stern said in a phone interview.

The 300 astronomers and planetary scientists who signed the petition said they would not use the IAU's definition. Dissenters are organizing a conference next year to hash out a better definition, Stern said.

Pluto has been considered the ninth planet since it was discovered 1930. But the 2003 discovery of a nearby, larger body known as Xena prompted a reconsideration.

After rejecting a proposal to name Xena and two other bodies as planets, the IAU decided to downgrade Pluto and create a first-ever definition of what constitutes a planet.

According to the IAU, a body can be considered a planet if it orbits the Sun, is large enough to be made round by its own gravity, and has cleared the area around it of smaller cosmic objects.

That definition would exclude Earth and other planets that are pelted with asteroids, Stern said.

Others who did not sign the petition also criticized the IAU's decision.

"I'd like to see philosophers, writers and policymakers weigh in on this before we start rewriting textbooks," said Mark Bullock, also of the Southwest Research Institute.

One scientist involved in crafting the IAU's definition said other points of view were inevitable.

"There are many viable definitions for the word 'planet,"' said Richard Binzel, a planetary scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060901/sc_nm/space_pluto_dc