SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
forget sarah marshall


Reply to topic
Author Message
Marksyabastard
Title: Pope-on-a-rope
Joined: Mar 06 2008
Location: Louisville
PostPosted: Apr 30 2008 12:15 pm Reply with quote Back to top

not nearly as funny as superbad or knocked up...plus marshall from how i met your mother has his wang out a lot. now if they replaced his full frontal nudity with mila kunis, then youd have a movie worth watching. she had a body double for her boob shots.
View user's profileSend private message
Kubo
Joined: Aug 24 2005
Location: Mount Holly, NJ
PostPosted: Apr 30 2008 12:31 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I thought it was pretty damn funny myself. The English guy was worth the price of admission by himself.

I also dug Knocked Up, but Superbad, not so much. I don't know what it was... but I suspect it was that kid who also played in Juno. I can only listen to his whiny voice for about 15 seconds before I want to hit something.


Thou, because I am wroth, be not dismayed, for I shall win the strife, whoever circle round within for the defence. This their insolence is not new, for of old they used it at a less secret gate, which still is found without a bolt. Above it thou didst see the dead inscription; and already on this side of it
descends the steep, passing without escort through the circles,
One such that by him the city shall be opened to us.
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailAIM Address
S. McCracken
Moderator
Title: Enforcer
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Location: Massachusetts
PostPosted: Apr 30 2008 01:48 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Kubo wrote:
I thought it was pretty damn funny myself. The English guy was worth the price of admission by himself.

I also dug Knocked Up, but Superbad, not so much. I don't know what it was... but I suspect it was that kid who also played in Juno. I can only listen to his whiny voice for about 15 seconds before I want to hit something.

I loved Knocked Up but felt the Superbad was just too slow in the middle. They went for a great beginning, a mediocre middle, and by the end I didn't really care what happened. I'm excited to see Forgetting Sarah Marshall. Jason Segal is ridiculously funny on HIMYM and he wrote the film, and I refuse to NOT see a Judd Apatow movie. I'd rather see something and say it wasn't good (Superbad) than not see it at all and go off the words of others.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
username
Title: owner of a lonely heart
Joined: Jul 06 2007
Location: phoenix, az usa
PostPosted: May 15 2008 12:14 pm Reply with quote Back to top

this movie wasnt too bad. too much wang.

it was decently funny. more comedy than romantic which is always a plus.


Klimbatize wrote:
I'll eat a turkey sandwich while blowing my load

 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM AddressYahoo MessengerMSN Messenger
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Dec 31 2008 02:31 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Finally saw this. It was pretty terrible.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Pandajuice
Title: The Power of Grayskull
Joined: Oct 30 2008
Location: US and UK
PostPosted: Dec 31 2008 03:08 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I've made it a policy to stay far away from modern comedies. They are usually devoid of anything intelligent or funny, and really are a waste of time.
View user's profileSend private message
Burt Reynolds
Title: Bentley Bear
Joined: Apr 07 2008
Location: California
PostPosted: Dec 31 2008 03:13 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Pandajuice wrote:
I've made it a policy to stay far away from modern comedies. They are usually devoid of anything intelligent or funny, and really are a waste of time.
Rolling Eyes


Dances with Wolves 2 is gonna ROCK!
 
View user's profileSend private messageMSN Messenger
Optimist With Doubts
Title: Titlating
Joined: Dec 17 2007
PostPosted: Dec 31 2008 03:19 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Pandajuice wrote:
I've made it a policy to stay far away from modern comedies. They are usually devoid of anything intelligent or funny, and really are a waste of time.

Well the same could be said about comedies from 90's 80,s 70's and on backwards. I think avoiding comedies all together is a missed opportunity.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM AddressYahoo Messenger
Ermac
Title: Thread Killer
Joined: Aug 04 2008
Location: Outworld
PostPosted: Jan 01 2009 11:48 am Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
Finally saw this. It was pretty terrible.


I saw this in the theatre and I guess I got a different vibe from it, I had a girl like Sarah Marshall who acted like her and wanted to come back to me so it seemed so fitting to me in real life. I also got with the "better" girl in the end just like the movie withe me getting the dark haired chick who was better suited for me.

Overall the movie wasn't great, but had its moments.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Jan 01 2009 12:22 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Here's the thing, Sarah Marshall wasn't a hateable character. She broke up with him, yes, but when she gives the emotional speech about WHY she broke up with him, you lose any empathy you may have had for Peter. Sarah is never the malevolent bitch that she needs to be to drive the plot and make the movie work. No one in the film is completely unlikeable, and ironically, the protagonist comes off as the most unlikeable character. When Sarah realizes she still loves Peter at dinner and throws herself at him the next day, and Peter says fuck you, you broke my heart and runs off to be with the girl he met a few days ago, he doesn't come off as empowered, he comes off as a selfish prick. When you watch this movie, there's a constant sense that Sarah and Peter belong together. When they don't reunite, the movie reveals itself to be nothing more than a dumb soulless ego trip for writer/star Segel. The entire movie might as well be that montage of Segel fucking girls.

This movie wants to be Better Off Dead, but it lacks any semblance of that movie's charm.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Ermac
Title: Thread Killer
Joined: Aug 04 2008
Location: Outworld
PostPosted: Jan 01 2009 12:33 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
When they don't reunite, the movie reveals itself to be nothing more than a dumb soulless ego trip for writer/star Segel. The entire movie might as well be that montage of Segel fucking girls


great point, never really thought of it that way. It really was a time filler type movie to the extreme.

but Mila Kunis and Kristen Bell are both so hot I think it would be easy to make the mistake on who to choose

Image

Image


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Optimist With Doubts
Title: Titlating
Joined: Dec 17 2007
PostPosted: Jan 01 2009 05:16 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I just re watched the movie and I think that she really isn't meant to be a bitch. I think the movie is really just telling the story about two people who dated for a long time and how they can come back from that after a break up.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM AddressYahoo Messenger
Blackout
Title: Captain Oblivious
Joined: Sep 01 2007
Location: That Rainy State
PostPosted: Jan 01 2009 07:36 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Boob double? WEAK. No... just no.



 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM AddressYahoo MessengerMSN Messenger
FNJ
2010 SLF Tag Champ
Joined: Jun 07 2006
PostPosted: Jan 01 2009 07:59 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I enjoyed the film almost as much as I enjoyed tropic thunder. sometimes we all just have to pull our heads out of the high and mighty clouds, and just watch a movie instead of analyzing it.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
anorexorcist
Title: Polar Bear
Joined: May 21 2008
Location: The Cock and Plucket
PostPosted: Jan 01 2009 08:03 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Optimist With Doubts wrote:
I just re watched the movie and I think that she really isn't meant to be a bitch. I think the movie is really just telling the story about two people who dated for a long time and how they can come back from that after a break up.


They didn't really come back from it though.

If it is meant to be just a story of two people like you say(wich it very well could be), then they do a pretty poor job of it imo as the main story just isn't very interesting and there's a lot of "stupid" comedy that just makes it seem low quality.

I like crude humour, but this movie failed to be funny really.


Lawyers, Guns and Money
 
View user's profileSend private messageMSN Messenger
Ermac
Title: Thread Killer
Joined: Aug 04 2008
Location: Outworld
PostPosted: Jan 01 2009 08:21 pm Reply with quote Back to top

most of the funny parts of the movie were left out



Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Optimist With Doubts
Title: Titlating
Joined: Dec 17 2007
PostPosted: Jan 01 2009 09:14 pm Reply with quote Back to top

anorexorcist wrote:
Optimist With Doubts wrote:
I just re watched the movie and I think that she really isn't meant to be a bitch. I think the movie is really just telling the story about two people who dated for a long time and how they can come back from that after a break up.


They didn't really come back from it though.

If it is meant to be just a story of two people like you say(wich it very well could be), then they do a pretty poor job of it imo as the main story just isn't very interesting and there's a lot of "stupid" comedy that just makes it seem low quality.

I like crude humour, but this movie failed to be funny really.

Well I agree the humor was easy and crude jokes and those arent everyone's taste. But I like the movie.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM AddressYahoo Messenger
ReeperTheSeeker
Joined: Aug 26 2007
PostPosted: Jan 01 2009 09:50 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
Here's the thing, Sarah Marshall wasn't a hateable character. She broke up with him, yes, but when she gives the emotional speech about WHY she broke up with him, you lose any empathy you may have had for Peter. Sarah is never the malevolent bitch that she needs to be to drive the plot and make the movie work. No one in the film is completely unlikeable, and ironically, the protagonist comes off as the most unlikeable character. When Sarah realizes she still loves Peter at dinner and throws herself at him the next day, and Peter says fuck you, you broke my heart and runs off to be with the girl he met a few days ago, he doesn't come off as empowered, he comes off as a selfish prick. When you watch this movie, there's a constant sense that Sarah and Peter belong together. When they don't reunite, the movie reveals itself to be nothing more than a dumb soulless ego trip for writer/star Segel. The entire movie might as well be that montage of Segel fucking girls.

This movie wants to be Better Off Dead, but it lacks any semblance of that movie's charm.


So wait, does that mean Mila Kunis actually plays a likeable for once?


ImageImageImage
Links, pics, vids . . . I shall post these when given the chance
Transformers 2 Review: ". . . Did i mention SHIT BLOWS UP?!!!"
 
View user's profileSend private message
FNJ
2010 SLF Tag Champ
Joined: Jun 07 2006
PostPosted: Jan 02 2009 02:46 am Reply with quote Back to top

I hardly think she was pouring her soul out and throwing herself at him. I think it's more that she's an insecure shallow shell of a being, like all women are. when she had everything going for her she could get away with trading peter in for the newer model, but when her acting career fell to shit, her life was coming apart at the seams, and her current man left her (instead of her being in control and leaving him, like she is used to doing with her decisions in life), she realized how fragile everything was, and ended up trying to get back with peter because she assumed he was pathetic and needy enough to fall right back into her arms. he was a backup plan to her.

the chick that he met a few days ago showed him something new, something he liked in his life. it was an experience in being together with a member of the opposite sex that didn't involve someone being in control of his life. sarah's heartfelt speech about how it's peter's fault that she left him was her inability to deal with not being the center of attention with him, like she's used to with her career and stuff. you can see things like that all throughout the film, when they flash back to things like photographers taking shots of her and telling peter to get out of the way, and stuff like that.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Jan 02 2009 10:47 am Reply with quote Back to top

FNJ wrote:
I hardly think she was pouring her soul out and throwing herself at him. I think it's more that she's an insecure shallow shell of a being, like all women are. when she had everything going for her she could get away with trading peter in for the newer model, but when her acting career fell to shit, her life was coming apart at the seams, and her current man left her (instead of her being in control and leaving him, like she is used to doing with her decisions in life), she realized how fragile everything was, and ended up trying to get back with peter because she assumed he was pathetic and needy enough to fall right back into her arms. he was a backup plan to her.

See, if the movie at any point ever gave off any sort of vibe, that Sarah Marshall was just some cold calculating bitch and Peter was nothing more than a stepping stone for her, it would have been a lot better. But it doesn't, so unless you have own cynical assumptions about the female mind, Sarah never comes off as antagonist.

But instead, we find out that Sarah didn't break up with Peter for an exciting relationship with a famous rocker, she broke up with him because he spent most of his free time sulking in his apartment and once wore the same pair of sweatpants for an entire week. He absolutely was pathetic and needy, and she tried all sorts of things to snap him out of it but he was "too stupid to notice". And when that didn't work, their relationship ended. Then, after Sarah leaves, Peter begins taking some risks, which is what she wanted for him all along. I don't think there's any question that she loved him. If she was as evil as you want to believe she was, she would have stayed with Infant Sorrow Guy, because that would have kept her in the tabloids and been better for her career.

As I said before, the problem is that everyone is too nice. Even the self-involved English rocker, who writes pedantic songs and thinks he has the right to fuck everything that moves, isn't a bad guy; he teaches the creepy guy from 30 Rock how to make love.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
username
Title: owner of a lonely heart
Joined: Jul 06 2007
Location: phoenix, az usa
PostPosted: Jan 02 2009 06:22 pm Reply with quote Back to top

FNJ wrote:
I enjoyed the film almost as much as I enjoyed tropic thunder. sometimes we all just have to pull our heads out of the high and mighty clouds, and just watch a movie instead of analyzing it.

hear hear


Klimbatize wrote:
I'll eat a turkey sandwich while blowing my load

 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM AddressYahoo MessengerMSN Messenger
FNJ
2010 SLF Tag Champ
Joined: Jun 07 2006
PostPosted: Jan 02 2009 08:10 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
FNJ wrote:
I hardly think she was pouring her soul out and throwing herself at him. I think it's more that she's an insecure shallow shell of a being, like all women are. when she had everything going for her she could get away with trading peter in for the newer model, but when her acting career fell to shit, her life was coming apart at the seams, and her current man left her (instead of her being in control and leaving him, like she is used to doing with her decisions in life), she realized how fragile everything was, and ended up trying to get back with peter because she assumed he was pathetic and needy enough to fall right back into her arms. he was a backup plan to her.

See, if the movie at any point ever gave off any sort of vibe, that Sarah Marshall was just some cold calculating bitch and Peter was nothing more than a stepping stone for her, it would have been a lot better. But it doesn't, so unless you have own cynical assumptions about the female mind, Sarah never comes off as antagonist.

But instead, we find out that Sarah didn't break up with Peter for an exciting relationship with a famous rocker, she broke up with him because he spent most of his free time sulking in his apartment and once wore the same pair of sweatpants for an entire week. He absolutely was pathetic and needy, and she tried all sorts of things to snap him out of it but he was "too stupid to notice". And when that didn't work, their relationship ended. Then, after Sarah leaves, Peter begins taking some risks, which is what she wanted for him all along. I don't think there's any question that she loved him. If she was as evil as you want to believe she was, she would have stayed with Infant Sorrow Guy, because that would have kept her in the tabloids and been better for her career.

As I said before, the problem is that everyone is too nice. Even the self-involved English rocker, who writes pedantic songs and thinks he has the right to fuck everything that moves, isn't a bad guy; he teaches the creepy guy from 30 Rock how to make love.


truthfully, I don't even believe all of what I said. most of it maybe, but a lot of that was just spice. I was trying in my own special way to say the following:

I don't think it's that she set out to be a cold calculating bitch, so much as that's what she felt would be okay to do.

I think that at the base of it, you're watching a film that tells two sides of a story. if you and I got into a fight, I could say that it's all your fault and that I tried, and on the other end you could say the same about me. to anyone on the outside, they'd see two guys fighting and then form their own opinions on who was right and who was wrong. I think that's what makes this film so interesting to me. there is no clear cut sinner or saint. It's saying "nobody is perfect."

You took away from that "fight" that peter is a dick and sarah is likeable enough to not be a bitch, I took away from it that sarah is a bitch, and peter found something better that made him more happy.

maybe what we can take away from this film is that at the end of the day, peter and sarah just weren't right for each other. while he was dating her he just wasn't motivated to do anything, and yet when things change and he meets this different kind of girl, something gets him in the mood to chase his dream and finish his musical. Sarah also isn't getting the short end of the stick like most would in a film like this, by showing that she got a new show, and things are almost back to normal. if it was really out to make her look like the bad guy, they could have easily just left her alone and with a crashing and burning career.

and infant sorrow guy dumped her, not the other way around, so I don't think she could have really just stuck with him.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
Ermac
Title: Thread Killer
Joined: Aug 04 2008
Location: Outworld
PostPosted: Jan 02 2009 08:28 pm Reply with quote Back to top

thanks to this thread I now call it "forget sarah marshall" instead of the proper "forgetting", similiar to the way I now call Jeff Spicoli Douche McCallister when I see fast times

but anyway, this movie is no more ridiculous than all the Woody Allen movies where beautiful women are inexplicably drawn to his characters...


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
S. McCracken
Moderator
Title: Enforcer
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Location: Massachusetts
PostPosted: Jan 04 2009 09:06 pm Reply with quote Back to top

To be fair, Peter finds out that Sarah was cheating on him a year before they broke up. That makes her the bad person.

Also, I really thought that it was a decent depiction of when two people who have been together for a long time break up, and the consequences/feelings that go into effect when they're around each other again. I don't think it was supposed to be "Sarah = pure evil" but you're supposed to get the sense that she'd had enough of Peter being a sloth and was banging a guy on the side.

He fell for another girl but there were still feelings for Sarah, and then he just couldn't go through with hitting it again when he figured everything out.

In the end, I think the level of "funny" that someone gets when it comes to this movie will be based upon whether or not he or she has ever been in a long-term relationship that went sour and has had to pick up the pieces.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: