| Author |
Message |
@om*d
Title: Dorakyura
Joined: Jul 10 2010
Location: Castlevania
Posts: 4226
|
Grand Theft Auto IV sucks ass. Uninteresting characters and boring story that makes me fall asleep.
|
|
|
   |
|
Greg the White
Joined: Apr 09 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3112
|
| atomjacked wrote: |
| Grand Theft Auto IV sucks ass. Uninteresting characters and boring story that makes me fall asleep. |
I'll add in the fact. I didn't like GTA3 or any of its sub-games (I'm sorry, but good controls are big point for me).
And I'll try to reiterate myself, that I don't think most of these games are bad by any standard. I may not like something, or it may not fit my tastes, but I won't automatically call it bad by proxy, or insult anyone's tastes.
|
 So here's to you Mrs. Robinson. People love you more- oh, nevermind. |
|
  |
|
taterfyrings
Joined: Sep 25 2009
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 395
|
| Douche McCallister wrote: |
| taterfyrings wrote: |
| I think the game had a lot of potential, however some really poor design choices (like the terrible materia-system who makes every character interchangeable) |
What's the difference between the Materia system and the Esper system? |
The difference is that in FFVI you have to invest in your characters, which makes the choices you make much more important and interesting. So for example, you have to decide who to learn white magic, who to learn black magic etc, which actually put a bit of strategy in the game. Of course, this does not matter if you over-level to much (which is unfortunately easy to do in an amazing game like FFVI), but if you play it normally, the choices will matter in a completely different way than in FFVII. Also, the fact that you have to form three parties in the last dungeons (and two parties several times through the game) means that you have to be even more careful with who you choose to use during the quest, and who you choose to learn things. Quite simply, Final Fantasy VI has a lot of strategy going for it, while FFVII barely has anything, which makes the gameplay of FFVI wastly superior in my opinion.
However, even though I think Final Fantasy VII is extremely overrated, I still find it a good game, and especially the start of the game (in Midgar) was extremely satisfying to play. To bad it collapses somewhat when you enter the world map.
|
|
|
  |
|
Slayer1
Title: ,,!,, for you know who
Joined: Sep 23 2008
Posts: 4274
|
| Greg the White wrote: |
| atomjacked wrote: |
| Grand Theft Auto IV sucks ass. Uninteresting characters and boring story that makes me fall asleep. |
I'll add in the fact. I didn't like GTA3 or any of its sub-games (I'm sorry, but good controls are big point for me).
And I'll try to reiterate myself, that I don't think most of these games are bad by any standard. I may not like something, or it may not fit my tastes, but I won't automatically call it bad by proxy, or insult anyone's tastes. |
Of all the GTA games, the only one I thoroughly liked and enjoyed enough was San Andreas. GTA IV had the most dis-likable main character I ever played.
I don't think you are too much alone with the hatred of IV atom.
|
|
|
  |
|
Beach Bum
Joined: Dec 08 2010
Location: At the pants party.
Posts: 1777
|
| Slayer1 wrote: |
| Greg the White wrote: |
| atomjacked wrote: |
| Grand Theft Auto IV sucks ass. Uninteresting characters and boring story that makes me fall asleep. |
I'll add in the fact. I didn't like GTA3 or any of its sub-games (I'm sorry, but good controls are big point for me).
And I'll try to reiterate myself, that I don't think most of these games are bad by any standard. I may not like something, or it may not fit my tastes, but I won't automatically call it bad by proxy, or insult anyone's tastes. |
Of all the GTA games, the only one I thoroughly liked and enjoyed enough was San Andreas. GTA IV had the most dis-likable main character I ever played.
I don't think you are too much alone with the hatred of IV atom. |
Strangely enough San Andreas was the only one I've enjoyed enough to beat. Something about it really kept my attention and made me want to play it all the way through. While the others I most just did enough missions to get decent weapons before going on a murder spree and quitting the game after a few hours. GTA IV did have a terrible main character though, holy shit is Niko annoying.
|
|
|
  |
|
brian
Banned
Title: Shit Disturber
Joined: Oct 14 2011
Posts: 81
|
Oddly enough, I found San Andreas to be the most playable too. I picked up up Vice City after playing GTA:SA thinking 'ok, now I'll have the game play I love with the decade I love.'... but... it was just terrible for some reason, aside from the graphics that looked like N64 graphics, a la petroleum jelly smeared all over the lens...
Never played it more than 2-3 days tops, and now it sits on my shelf.... one of these days I'll have to bust it out and actually play it to get my moneys worth.
Edit: on a side note, I never had ANY interest ion GTA after playing the first installment on PC, back when it first came out. But I got the game for FREE when I bought a used version of Sega Classics Collection for PS2 and the GTA:SA disc just happened to be in there with the Sega Classic disc... still don't know how that happened, because their display boxes are empty and then they take the disc out of a sleeve and put it in the case before you take it home,.. but sure enouhh, there it was. and it got a lot of play.
|
|
|
  |
|
Beach Bum
Joined: Dec 08 2010
Location: At the pants party.
Posts: 1777
|
Vice City easily is the worst of the 3D GTA games in my opinion. I remember playing it and not being able to see half of what was going on on-screen because it was so fucking blurry. Right around sundown or sunrise in game it became completely unplayable for me, the sun came right into the camera and mixed with how blurry it already looked you couldn't see to even keep on the road anymore. I put maybe 6 hours into it hoping I'd find a reason to keep playing before I couldn't take it anymore and took it back to the video store. For as crappy as GTA IV's characters are at least you can see to play the game, even if you don't want to play it because you have to deal with Niko.
|
|
|
  |
|
username
Title: owner of a lonely heart
Joined: Jul 06 2007
Location: phoenix, az usa
Posts: 16136
|
i thought all 3 GTA games on the PS2 were great. they had each their own charm. the story in vice city was awesome. CJ in san andreas was a likeable character. claude in GTA III had his charm as well.
GTA IV on the other hand...
|

| Klimbatize wrote: |
| I'll eat a turkey sandwich while blowing my load |
|
|
     |
|
Slayer1
Title: ,,!,, for you know who
Joined: Sep 23 2008
Posts: 4274
|
| username wrote: |
i thought all 3 GTA games on the PS2 were great. they had each their own charm. the story in vice city was awesome. CJ in san andreas was a likeable character. claude in GTA III had his charm as well.
GTA IV on the other hand... |
It seemed like they were more on the focus of the city as a "living" entity versus any form of riveting character development or anything that might capture the same charm the PS2 games had. I heard TLATD and BOGT was a step towards the earlier games but IV has kind of ruined GTA for me.
|
|
|
  |
|
Cameron
Title: :O � O:
Joined: Feb 01 2008
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 4637
|
| atomjacked wrote: |
| Grand Theft Auto IV sucks ass. Uninteresting characters and boring story that makes me fall asleep. |
This. It seems like, other than the graphics, they downgraded literally everything from San Andreas. I still consider San Andreas to be the end-all-be-all of GTA games.
| Beach Bum wrote: |
| Vice City easily is the worst of the 3D GTA games |
LIES
|
|
|
  |
|
Vaenamoenen
Joined: Mar 18 2010
Location: Tuonela
Posts: 299
|
| Slayer1 wrote: |
| GTA IV had the most dis-likable main character I ever played. |
That's funny. Many of my friends from the US say the same thing. Maybe East-European protagonist from a ex-communist country just doesn't appear that interesting or likeable for you guys. As for myself, I can almost relate. I agree that he isn't nearly as funny as CJ from SA. Love GTA IV, though.
|
|
|
  |
|
Douche McCallister
Moderator
Title: DOO-SHAY
Joined: Jan 26 2007
Location: Private Areas
Posts: 5672
|
| taterfyrings wrote: |
| The difference is that in FFVI you have to invest in your characters, which makes the choices you make much more important and interesting. So for example, you have to decide who to learn white magic, who to learn black magic etc, which actually put a bit of strategy in the game. |
Turning this into a pissing contest for a second...
Decide who learns White and Black magic? I can't remember an extended period of time where my characters didn't have the same exact spells. In FFVII you go through about all 3 discs before anyone in your party has the same spell as someone else.
Final Fantasy VI; 3 group solution -
Team 1 Equip Offering and Genji Glove on someone with the Atma and Illumina/Ragnorock
Team 2 Equip Fastest person with Gem Box and X-Magic; cast Ultima
Team 3 Have Sabin use Bum Rush, have Gogo mimic.
|
|
|
   |
|
Slayer1
Title: ,,!,, for you know who
Joined: Sep 23 2008
Posts: 4274
|
| Vaenamoenen wrote: |
| Slayer1 wrote: |
| GTA IV had the most dis-likable main character I ever played. |
That's funny. Many of my friends from the US say the same thing. Maybe East-European protagonist from a ex-communist country just doesn't appear that interesting or likeable for you guys. As for myself, I can almost relate. I agree that he isn't nearly as funny as CJ from SA. Love GTA IV, though.  |
It's not so much as his descent for me. It's how he portrayed himself. He was all about trying to make a new life in the country and avoid what he did in his past, yet what does he do in the first couple of missions? Goes out and does the exact same sort of shit that got him "exiled" from his country in the first place.
At least with Claude from GTA III he was about getting revenge for being shot in the head by Catalina, Vice City was half about Vercetti pleasing his boss and in the end making himself Tony Montana and San Andreas involved CJ trying to come to terms with his life and how his family turned out. Claude and Vercetti were criminals, CJ was just living how he always lived to survive. And Nico? Might as well just brought his AK-47 over from the old country...
|
|
|
  |
|
@om*d
Title: Dorakyura
Joined: Jul 10 2010
Location: Castlevania
Posts: 4226
|
I actually don't mind the character of Niko. He fits in well with other GTA main characters other than CJ in San Andreas. I was mostly annoyed about getting constantly called by friends and having to do stupid shit on the internet. The game just seems unnecessarily drawn out. Add some irritating characters (Roman comes to mind immediately) and I would rather be playing Saints Row. I guess I personally don't like playing such a long boring game about committing crimes that doesn't mix it up with more ridiculousness and humor.
|
|
|
   |
|
username
Title: owner of a lonely heart
Joined: Jul 06 2007
Location: phoenix, az usa
Posts: 16136
|
| atomjacked wrote: |
| I actually don't mind the character of Niko. He fits in well with other GTA main characters other than CJ in San Andreas. I was mostly annoyed about getting constantly called by friends and having to do stupid shit on the internet. The game just seems unnecessarily drawn out. Add some irritating characters (Roman comes to mind immediately) and I would rather be playing Saints Row. I guess I personally don't like playing such a long boring game about committing crimes that doesn't mix it up with more ridiculousness and humor. |
yeah. this is how i felt
|

| Klimbatize wrote: |
| I'll eat a turkey sandwich while blowing my load |
|
|
     |
|
brian
Banned
Title: Shit Disturber
Joined: Oct 14 2011
Posts: 81
|
| Slayer1 wrote: |
| CJ was just living how he always lived to survive. |
Maybe this is why I loved GTA:SA so much....
|
|
|
  |
|
Vaenamoenen
Joined: Mar 18 2010
Location: Tuonela
Posts: 299
|
Final Fantasy XIII. No game has ever disappointed me this bad. Hence, the hate. Who cares about running in a decorated pipe, which doesn't even try to hide its über-linear nature. I liked the graphics, and the battle system as well as the plot was ok. So this isn't actually a bad game. It's just the worst FF-game.
|
|
|
  |
|
taterfyrings
Joined: Sep 25 2009
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 395
|
| Douche McCallister wrote: |
| taterfyrings wrote: |
| The difference is that in FFVI you have to invest in your characters, which makes the choices you make much more important and interesting. So for example, you have to decide who to learn white magic, who to learn black magic etc, which actually put a bit of strategy in the game. |
Turning this into a pissing contest for a second...
Decide who learns White and Black magic? I can't remember an extended period of time where my characters didn't have the same exact spells. In FFVII you go through about all 3 discs before anyone in your party has the same spell as someone else.
Final Fantasy VI; 3 group solution -
Team 1 Equip Offering and Genji Glove on someone with the Atma and Illumina/Ragnorock
Team 2 Equip Fastest person with Gem Box and X-Magic; cast Ultima
Team 3 Have Sabin use Bum Rush, have Gogo mimic. |
Yeah, this is the kind of advanced tactics you have if you know the game well, which can break every rpg out there. However, if you play the game normally for the first or second time, you will carefully decide which esper to equip to which member, and who to bring, because it clearly matters, and it is important to level up all the characters since you have to use at least 12 of them at various points in the game. In Final Fantasy 7 you play with three characters for the whole game, as the game never really gives you any incentive to change it up (except when a certain person dies), and if you want to change around, you just change all the materia which all the skills are tied to - which makes any real strategy completely pointless IMO.
|
|
|
  |
|
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 11244
|
| Douche McCallister wrote: |
| taterfyrings wrote: |
| The difference is that in FFVI you have to invest in your characters, which makes the choices you make much more important and interesting. So for example, you have to decide who to learn white magic, who to learn black magic etc, which actually put a bit of strategy in the game. |
Turning this into a pissing contest for a second...
Decide who learns White and Black magic? I can't remember an extended period of time where my characters didn't have the same exact spells. In FFVII you go through about all 3 discs before anyone in your party has the same spell as someone else.
Final Fantasy VI; 3 group solution -
Team 1 Equip Offering and Genji Glove on someone with the Atma and Illumina/Ragnorock
Team 2 Equip Fastest person with Gem Box and X-Magic; cast Ultima
Team 3 Have Sabin use Bum Rush, have Gogo mimic. |
I solved the Esper/sword debacle. I chose to not make the choice. Ever. My cart game has everyone with every spell at level 99 with maxed out stats based on Esper choices during level ups. Yet no fucking Ragnorock. People wonder why I like FFIV better than FFVI... perhaps I enjoy a little bit of fucking structure in my characters so that my god damn OCD doesn't destroy days of my life.
|
|
|
   |
|
Rayk
Title: just got here
Joined: Oct 20 2011
Location: the states
Posts: 33
|
| Syd Lexia wrote: |
These aren't games that I necessarily hate, they're just games that I haven't played and have no interest in ever playing:
Elder Scrolls
Gears Of War
Mass Effect |
*snip*
I agree with all the other games you wouldn't play except these three, espescially the newer elder scrolls, and mass effect. These two series would prolly rank in my top 10 game series of my time. Gears was good as well imo.
... as for games I hate that everyone else loves, I would say the madden games(still talk shit to friends that nfl 2k on dreamcast was way better than madden at the time) and the whole megaman series for me. I liked megaman at one time back in the day, but it has no replayability for me now.
|
 "A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer." -
- Bruce Lee |
|
  |
|
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
Posts: 24887
|
I don't think Elder Scrolls or Mass Effect are bad. They're some of the most beloved games in recent years. I just don't want to commit the time to them. I don't know why, but Western RPGs just don't captivate me the way JRPGs do.
|
|
|
     |
|
Preng
Title: All right, that's cool!
Joined: Jan 11 2010
Location: Accounting Dept.
Posts: 1690
|
| Syd Lexia wrote: |
| I don't think Elder Scrolls or Mass Effect are bad. They're some of the most beloved games in recent years. I just don't want to commit the time to them. I don't know why, but Western RPGs just don't captivate me the way JRPGs do. |
Having played Oblivion, I'll add that the game seems to be one of those love-or-hate RPGs. If I bring it up in a conversation, people will either immediately start raving or rabbling about the game.
The game had a fair amount of bugs, and there's the entire uncanny valley thing going on what with the ultra-close up conversations, but I liked Oblivion because the game offered a great deal of solitude. At any rate, the music is quite excellent.
I haven't played the Mass Effect series, so I don't have any relevant comments.
|
|
|
  |
|
Slayer1
Title: ,,!,, for you know who
Joined: Sep 23 2008
Posts: 4274
|
| Preng wrote: |
| Syd Lexia wrote: |
| I don't think Elder Scrolls or Mass Effect are bad. They're some of the most beloved games in recent years. I just don't want to commit the time to them. I don't know why, but Western RPGs just don't captivate me the way JRPGs do. |
Having played Oblivion, I'll add that the game seems to be one of those love-or-hate RPGs. If I bring it up in a conversation, people will either immediately start raving or rabbling about the game.
The game had a fair amount of bugs, and there's the entire uncanny valley thing going on what with the ultra-close up conversations, but I liked Oblivion because the game offered a great deal of solitude. At any rate, the music is quite excellent.
|
if anything Oblivion outshines Morrowind... Fuck Morrowind
|
|
|
  |
|
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 11244
|
| Syd Lexia wrote: |
| I don't think Elder Scrolls or Mass Effect are bad. They're some of the most beloved games in recent years. I just don't want to commit the time to them. I don't know why, but Western RPGs just don't captivate me the way JRPGs do. |
Would you play KOTOR already...
|
|
|
   |
|
taterfyrings
Joined: Sep 25 2009
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 395
|
Morrowind is awesome. Also:
| GPFontaine wrote: |
I solved the Esper/sword debacle. I chose to not make the choice. Ever. My cart game has everyone with every spell at level 99 with maxed out stats based on Esper choices during level ups. Yet no fucking Ragnorock. People wonder why I like FFIV better than FFVI... perhaps I enjoy a little bit of fucking structure in my characters so that my god damn OCD doesn't destroy days of my life. |
Every rpg gets fucked if you level to much, that is nothing special with FFVI. Also, FFIV offers almost no customization, making the "rpg"-label almost strange IMO. Still a great game and my second favorite in the series, but the gameplay is not where it shines imo. And the difficulty of the western version was ridiculous.
|
|
|
  |
|
|
|