| aeonic wrote: |
| Ditto that. I mean, I don't know, nobody even seems to care about Waco or Oklahoma City or anything else now |
I do, there's something worse in my mind about Americans terrorizing other Americans, yeah 911 was worse by far when it comes to scale but it was a bunch of foreign pricks that none of us knew, or at least all of us here personally or anyone I know or anyone who I know knows, but Oklahoma was perpetrated by fellow Americans which feels worse somehow to me at least when it comes to betrayal if not the the scale of the atrocity. I know this country is not a big happy family but it just seems wrong to attack your fellow countrymen or even your government in an underhanded sneak attack fashion like that.
I guess open warfare would be one thing if you were really that fucking determined to resist or fight or whatever your problem was but blowing up a building full of people is cowardly and pathetic and seems like a really stupid and pointless and tragic way to make a point. The fact that is was one of us just makes it more repulsive. I disagree
strongly severely with all sorts of things going on around here in this country, but blowing up buildings with fertilizer bombs seems like the worst and most illogical way to change something or make your point, I guess I just don't understand how people get there mentally to decide that shit is acceptable / justifiable.
| aeonic wrote: |
| as a result of it, there's been sweeping legislation to remove people's basic liberties and three sinkholes of war (one legal but unjustified, another totally unjustified and another illegal one) draining trillions from our national coffers and driving your children's children into debt they won't see their way out of unless there's an intervening sovereign default (which would be the best thing that could ever, ever happen after all the hemmorhaging). Seeing as how their aim was to destabilize the US, I'd say they kind of got the job accomplished, didn't they? |
I'm not going to argue the legitimacy of one war over the over or who is wrong or right in the grand scheme of things but what you've referred to above was the exact thing I feared and assumed would happen as I watched that second plane hit and realized that it wasn't some random accident. Kind of a weird feeling knowing that a shit sandwich is on the horizon and all you can do is prepare to chow down.
Personally I think trading freedoms for security is a bum deal, if I ended up in some sort of terrorist situation I'd tell the terrorist to kiss my ass and then present it, living in fear of their actions means they have won half the war they want to wage, at least that's how I see things.
Look at that whole skillet of shit where South Park was going to have a generic Canadian character named Mohammed with an M on his shirt and they got told NOPE YOU CANNOT DO THAT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES BECAUSE IT PUTS US ALL IN DANGER, yeah it was distasteful and inflammatory, but really if you think about it is letting opponents dictate our behavior based upon their reaction to said behavior
really the way to win any sort of dispute?
As a Christian I see people mock both facets of my faith and the general concept of my faith in general ALL THE TIME, but do I go out and blow shit up because of that? NO, because I'm a rational adult human being and expected to act as such in this punch bowl with a turd floating in it world we all share, and despite my strong discordance with other groups and their beliefs motives and ideas I don't think that being the biggest dick in the dick waving contest solves
anything, so I try to keep my dick in my pants so to speak because that's how fucking rational fully grown adults should act. WHY CAN'T WE ALL GET ALONG?!
*edit*
What I mean but the whole kiss my ass sentiment is not meant as tough guy hyperbole at least not intentionally, but rather my take on the whole turn the other cheek philosophy. As a Christian I think that violence in general and killing specifically is plain wrong, but I understand that sometimes one will have to defend one's life and you don't always have time to think clearly in those situations.
What I would strive for is to defend myself so I can continue existing without killing someone else. If I had to break someone's jaw or arm to disarm them and stay alive I'd do it right away, but I wouldn't be happy or proud of the outcome because I think that if we all really try we can resolve our differences without violence and the violence I took part in to survive would represent a failure of that ability to communicate rationally and come to a common understanding, and it wouldn't really matter to me where the blame lay at the end of the situation.
however if I were truly facing death and had no way out and was given a choice to renounce my beliefs or morals or whatever (
be they religion based or freedom based or however you want to phrase it) OR dying I wouldn't be comfortable with myself if I betrayed that and would have to turn the other cheek so to speak and present my ass for kissing.
Am I coming across rationally with this or do I seem like a nutjob? Also who knows what would
really happen, I might cry and beg and do whatever some dick with a box cutter demanded, or I might go all Rambo instinct mode and kill my hypothetical assailant with a ballpoint pen to the throat. What I'm trying to say is I respect how the passengers on flight 93 went out, they resisted and I'd like to think I'd do the same, at least within the boundaries I've set for myself when it comes to violence.