SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
Closing the gap


Reply to topic
Author Message
Lady_Satine
Title: Head of Lexian R&D
Joined: Oct 15 2005
Location: Metro area, Georgia
PostPosted: May 09 2007 02:49 am Reply with quote Back to top

Comcast is taking action to close the gap between film release dates and the date those films are shown on television. They are talking with Hollywood studios about being able to release films on television on the day they are released in the theater. These films would be a little like pay-per-view is now, but they would cost somewhere in the range of $30-$50 to watch in your home.

There has been no decision on whether or not the proposal will be accepted, but there has been much talk lately on trying to close the window between when films are released in theaters and when they are available for home viewing.


"Life is a waste of time. Time is a waste of life. Get wasted all the time, and you'll have the time of your life!"
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Char Aznable
Title: Char Classicâ„¢
Joined: Jul 24 2006
Location: Robot Boombox HQ
PostPosted: May 09 2007 08:30 am Reply with quote Back to top

Why the fuck would you pay $30 to watch a movie on a TV that's small compared to the movie screen, which you pay $8 to $10 dollars for.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
DarkMaze
Joined: Feb 24 2006
PostPosted: May 09 2007 09:56 am Reply with quote Back to top

That, and theaters are threatening not to show movies that are released for TV on the same day.
View user's profileSend private message
S. McCracken
Moderator
Title: Enforcer
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Location: Massachusetts
PostPosted: May 09 2007 10:55 am Reply with quote Back to top

Offical verdict: RETARDED. Slobberknocker!


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Cattivo
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Location: Lake Michigan
PostPosted: May 09 2007 01:25 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I'd pay ten bucks to do that, but there's no way I'd pay that much. Ridiculous.
View user's profileSend private message
Tebor
Moderator
Title: Master of the Universe
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Location: Gotham City
PostPosted: May 09 2007 02:00 pm Reply with quote Back to top

So the movie industry had a hard time last year. With "Disturbia" being #1 for three weeks and the record breaking "Spider-Man 3", it just shows that people will go see movies when they have time.

Maybe giving them the option to stay home would help studios recoup losses, but with DVD every movie seems to be making back its money dollar by dollar. Even Pluto Nash.


"If you will not tell me, I will hurt people!!!" -Nuclear Man

"Do you hear? The alpha and the omega. Death and rebirth. And as you die, so will I be reborn!" - Skeletor

8341 unread forum updates since I left (2/7/14)... Uh-oh.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Knyte
2010 SLF Tag Champ*
Title: Curator Of The VGM
Joined: Nov 01 2006
Location: Here I am.
PostPosted: May 09 2007 02:01 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Wow, people are getting spoiled.

I remember.. (old man rant ahead!) in the earlier days of VHS, that you could buy videos of films when they were first released on tape for about $100.00 a film. Some people paid it. Mostly Video Rental Stores, but a few consumers would pay these prices to have the movies they loved before everyone else. Usually have a month or so later, the prices would drop to the usual $15-$20 range.
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Tebor
Moderator
Title: Master of the Universe
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Location: Gotham City
PostPosted: May 09 2007 02:10 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Knyte wrote:
I remember.. (old man rant ahead!) in the earlier days of VHS, that you could buy videos of films when they were first released on tape for about $100.00 a film. Some people paid it. Mostly Video Rental Stores, but a few consumers would pay these prices to have the movies they loved before everyone else. Usually have a month or so later, the prices would drop to the usual $15-$20 range.

I remember when "The Usual Suspects" came out on VHS it sold for $30, which I thought was way too much. However, in a day where I can buy a new release DVD for $20 and get another DVD for free, I realize the times are good.

I love being spoiled. Cool


"If you will not tell me, I will hurt people!!!" -Nuclear Man

"Do you hear? The alpha and the omega. Death and rebirth. And as you die, so will I be reborn!" - Skeletor

8341 unread forum updates since I left (2/7/14)... Uh-oh.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: May 09 2007 04:06 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Knyte wrote:
I remember.. (old man rant ahead!) in the earlier days of VHS, that you could buy videos of films when they were first released on tape for about $100.00 a film. Some people paid it. Mostly Video Rental Stores, but a few consumers would pay these prices to have the movies they loved before everyone else. Usually have a month or so later, the prices would drop to the usual $15-$20 range.

My mom was the manager at a Blockbuster for awhile and she explained to me how it worked. When movies would come out on VHS, some movies were priced to own and others were priced to rent. Basically, the studio would do whichever one it thought would benefit it. That's why you'd see 15 copies of certain movies on the new release wall at your video store and only 1 or 2 of others. Coincidentally, it was usually the less successful films that were priced to rent.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: