Yanno, that's actually a valid point...

If this is a movie for objectivists made by objectivists, shouldn't its production values be above Titanic AND Avatar combined, with a casting that won't be seen anywhere else, since objectivists are supposed to be the brightest and the best at doing anything? Oh yes, no proper funding.

But that being said, wouldn't the objectivists tycoons of the world be compelled to invest in this movie in the hopes to enlighten the masses about Ayn Rand and the greatness of Objectivism? Or perhaps said tycoons didn't feel like it because it didn't fit within their rational self-interest agenda?

Furthermore, seeing how well received this movie was, what does it tell us about the director? That he didn't work hard enough to achieve his happiness? That he fails to follow the same philosophy he expected to share with this movie?

Oh sweet, sweet irony; there's just layers upon layers of it...

I read cliff notes long time ago; you want to criticize me in terms of not understanding her philosophy or not understanding the novel? Because if it's the latter, I can give it some leverage.

And the name's AtmanRyu; there's an Atma already in the forums.