SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
Metrication and You


Reply to topic
Author Message
Mr. Satire
Joined: Jun 08 2010
Location: Termina Field
PostPosted: Jan 16 2011 10:57 am Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
The problem with the Metric System is that the world isn't a nice, neat place. If it was, we'd have a 360 day year, divided into 12 30-day months, each comprised of 5 6-day weeks. But that's not how things work.

The date and time is irrelevant to what system one uses. In fact, I don't think there is any difference between systems for time and date.


Image
Signature by Hacker (RIP)
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website
Mr. Satire
Joined: Jun 08 2010
Location: Termina Field
PostPosted: Jan 16 2011 11:01 am Reply with quote Back to top

sidewaydriver wrote:
The metric system can suck my [unneeded detail] cock. However, I'm all for everyone speaking English.

Language is a big thing. If we force everyone into it, we might as well make a standard measurement system. I vote... well, what have I been fighting for this whole time?


Image
Signature by Hacker (RIP)
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website
Alowishus
Joined: Aug 04 2009
PostPosted: Jan 16 2011 11:33 am Reply with quote Back to top

Atma wrote:
Syd Lexia wrote:

Fathoms, nautical miles, and leagues are probably relevant to sea-faring types, but normal people don't use them.

We use Fathoms and Nautical Miles. But I've never heard anyone use Leagues since I've been in the Navy.

I think A Nautical Mile is a smarter System. 6000ft even compared to the 5280 in a normal Mile.


I only threw out their leagues because of 10,000 leagues under the sea.

How big or small a league is... i have no idea. Well it must be deep anyway cause it's about a sea monster... i think lol.

Mr. Satire wrote:
Syd Lexia wrote:
The problem with the Metric System is that the world isn't a nice, neat place. If it was, we'd have a 360 day year, divided into 12 30-day months, each comprised of 5 6-day weeks. But that's not how things work.

The date and time is irrelevant to what system one uses. In fact, I don't think there is any difference between systems for time and date.


I'm nearly 100% sure that there are countries who aren't on the same calendar as us.

Yeah we are Gregorian Calendar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_calendar

Tis the old Julian Calendar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_calendar

The rest are new to me:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_week_date
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_calendars#Details_of_the_modern_calendar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_calendar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_calendar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_year_numbering

This one is my favorite:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discordian_calendar
Quote:
The Discordian calendar has five 73-day seasons: Chaos, Discord, Confusion, Bureaucracy, and The Aftermath. The Discordian year is aligned with the Gregorian calendar and begins on January 1, thus Chaos 1, 3177 YOLD is January 1, 2011 Gregorian.

The Erisian week consists of five days: Sweetmorn, Boomtime, Pungenday, Prickle-Prickle, and Setting Orange. The days of the week are named after the five basic Discordian elements: Sweet, Boom, Pungent, Prickle, and Orange. There are 73 of these weeks per year.


EDIT: Just realised i read your post wrong lol, i suppose could just throw out that calendar stuff now anyway.
View user's profileSend private message
Milhouse
Joined: Dec 19 2008
Location: Charlottesville, VA
PostPosted: Jan 16 2011 02:41 pm Reply with quote Back to top

All I know for sure is that we measure horses in 'hands' and good times in 'fingers.'
View user's profileSend private message
HardcoreGamer4Ever
Title: I Am The God Of Awesome
Joined: Jun 28 2010
Location: Your Mom's Vagina!
PostPosted: Jan 16 2011 02:49 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I think we should invent a new system. For example, 1 Lexia= 19 Inches.


https://badassgorilla.blogspot.com/

Yo yo yo, check out my new(ish) site!

RIP Happy Katana (2010-2020)
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
PostPosted: Jan 16 2011 05:19 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Alowishus wrote:
I only threw out their leagues because of 10,000 leagues under the sea.

How big or small a league is... i have no idea. Well it must be deep anyway cause it's about a sea monster... i think lol.

It's 20,000 Leagues...

A league is about 3 miles, supposedly the distance an average can can walk in one hour.

Also, a nautical mile isn't 6,000 feet. It's about 6,076 feet, or 1/60th of one degree of latitude.
View user's profileSend private message
Ice2SeeYou
Title: Sexual Tyrannosaurus
Joined: Sep 28 2008
Location: South of Heaven
PostPosted: Jan 16 2011 05:54 pm Reply with quote Back to top

One benefit to the metric system is that I feel less like a fatass by saying I weigh 91 kilos, rather than 200 pounds.


Sydlexia.com - Where miserable bastards meet to call each other retards.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Jack Slater
Title: Friendly Felon
Joined: May 17 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
PostPosted: Jan 16 2011 06:01 pm Reply with quote Back to top

HardcoreGamer4Ever wrote:
I think we should invent a new system. For example, 1 Lexia= 19 Inches.


I'll be the one that does what must be done.

1 Jack Slater = 8.5 inches.

Somebody was gonna do it eventually anyway.
View user's profileSend private message
Alowishus
Joined: Aug 04 2009
PostPosted: Jan 16 2011 07:53 pm Reply with quote Back to top

UsaSatsui wrote:
Alowishus wrote:
I only threw out their leagues because of 10,000 leagues under the sea.

How big or small a league is... i have no idea. Well it must be deep anyway cause it's about a sea monster... i think lol.

It's 20,000 Leagues...

A league is about 3 miles, supposedly the distance an average can can walk in one hour.

Also, a nautical mile isn't 6,000 feet. It's about 6,076 feet, or 1/60th of one degree of latitude.


Show's what i know lol.
View user's profileSend private message
bassguy252
Title: Professional Malcontent
Joined: May 26 2010
Location: Mount Dhoom!!!!!!!
PostPosted: Jan 16 2011 10:37 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Ice2SeeYou wrote:
One benefit to the metric system is that I feel less like a fatass by saying I weigh 91 kilos, rather than 200 pounds.


Oh Touche, a very good point

and 7 inches would convert to about

17.78 CM Smile


Let's assume it's a mixture of the two!


 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM AddressYahoo MessengerMSN Messenger
awsgames
Joined: May 29 2010
PostPosted: Jan 17 2011 02:28 am Reply with quote Back to top

As a teenager living in the USA who has had to learn both the Metric and the Imperial systems in school, I can say with confidence that the metric system is a lot easier and simpler to use.

I am more comfortable with the Imperial system when it comes to imagining things in relation to another. Ie, the stick is about a foot long, or that toy is 6 inches tall. But when it comes to calculating and converting things, the Metric system is easier.
View user's profileSend private message
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Jan 17 2011 09:02 am Reply with quote Back to top

Ice2SeeYou wrote:
One benefit to the metric system is that I feel less like a fatass by saying I weigh 91 kilos, rather than 200 pounds.

But the English system makes you feel taller.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
PostPosted: Jan 17 2011 11:50 am Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
Ice2SeeYou wrote:
One benefit to the metric system is that I feel less like a fatass by saying I weigh 91 kilos, rather than 200 pounds.

But the English system makes you feel taller.

No system makes me feel tall.



 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Atma
Title: Dragoon
Joined: Apr 29 2010
Location: Cincinnati, OH
PostPosted: Jan 17 2011 11:58 am Reply with quote Back to top

UsaSatsui wrote:
Also, a nautical mile isn't 6,000 feet. It's about 6,076 feet, or 1/60th of one degree of latitude.

Well, then entire US Navy is fucked up, we use 2000 Yards as a Nautical mile.

My secondary job for the Navy is Nautical Navigation, and I promise I'm not making that shit up.

EDIT: I looked it up, and Yes. The US Navy is just fucked up. We have adapted a Nautical Mile to 2000 Yards. I never knew that wasn't correct, and I've been doing Navigation for 6 years now. Embarrassed

Hey! Its how they trained me from day one!!!
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: