SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
Arizona shooting: Armed Citizen nearly shoots innocent


Reply to topic
Author Message
Dr. Strangelove
Joined: Dec 30 2010
Location: Salt Lake City
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 06:52 pm Reply with quote Back to top

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41018893/ns/slatecom/

I'm curious to see your opinions on this. Personally, I am pretty pro-gun rights, but I think that if an untrained civilian is using a handgun for anything other than personal protection (such as being a vigilante), that person is an idiot and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Had that man shot an innocent I hope that he would have got, at the very least, manslaughter charges brought against him. He was in a safe location, and then ran TOWARDS the gunfire. He had no good reason to do that.
View user's profileSend private message
Beach Bum
Joined: Dec 08 2010
Location: At the pants party.
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 07:05 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I personally like the idea of concealed carry. I know that issues like this might arise but I think to get a permit to conceal you should be required to go through at least some firearms training. Seriously if someone decides to start shooting up the local mall again while I'm there I'd like to be able to pull my Glock and drop him. The fact that the guy ran towards gunfire is pretty fucking retarded though. Seriously what kind of jackass runs towards gunfire without formal weapons training? That is just asking to get your ass shot or shoot someone you weren't aiming for because you have no idea what the fuck you are doing.
View user's profileSend private message
Dr. Strangelove
Joined: Dec 30 2010
Location: Salt Lake City
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 07:20 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I like the idea of conceal carry/obligatory training too. I'd have a conceal carry if I wasn't so damn broke. But I still think I would only use it if I absolutely had to (i.e. running is not an option). Going out of one's way to play hero will more likely than not end in disaster for oneself and others.
View user's profileSend private message
Alowishus
Joined: Aug 04 2009
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 07:55 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I'll give my view on this but i don't think people on here are going to take to it well..

I think the idea of guns being readily available for civilians to use to be ridiculous and stupid.

Year after year i sit and see the news come in of the latest school shooting tragedy or some other shooting in America and at first when i saw these i was genuinely shocked but now i am not even surprised and i just don't give a shit about them anymore.

When the right to wield a gun is in your constitution and that anyone can have one you are just asking for stuff like this to happen. Year after year, shooting after shooting it's the same old sob story about how a student came in and shot up the school or whatever it may be and you never learn. I am by no means saying that people getting shot in this way isn't a horrific event but like seriously how do you not expect this to happen.

Look already this year we have had this shooting and the one on the congresswoman by people who freely were allowed firearms. Where i live this is virtually unheard of. I don't think my country has ever had a school shooting ever or at least in my lifetime and why is that? We don't give guns to anyone.

Let's me honest here you say guns are used for personal protection. It hasn't done much good in protecting anyone at all these school shootings. How often do you hear in the news of people shooting their attackers who attempt to kill them, never.

This isn't a hit at you Beach Bum but i'll use your comment

Quote:
Seriously if someone decides to start shooting up the local mall again while I'm there I'd like to be able to pull my Glock and drop him.


Would it not be better to just not allow everyone to have access to guns and then there would be no shooting up of the mall.

Where i live guess who is allowed guns... people who hunt, people in the law enforcement. That is it and people who hunt need to provide lots of evidence to prove that they are safe in using a firearm etc.

and that is why i no longer have any sympathy when i see school shootings or whatever. It's all your own faults.

EDIT: A simple way to think of it. How many school shootings etc. do you hear in other countries who have laws probiting access to guns? Now look at the USA and just think of how many school shootings you know of with free access to them.

I can think of at least 5 in the USA and none anywhere else - and when i saw anywhere else i mean developed countries, places like Iraq or whatever do not count.
View user's profileSend private message
Beach Bum
Joined: Dec 08 2010
Location: At the pants party.
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 08:15 pm Reply with quote Back to top

We don't really have "free access" to guns. You have to jump through a bunch of hoops that the government has set up to get one legally. The problem is that criminals don't bother to jump through these hoops they either steal them or buy them from the person who did. It is my opinion that restricting access to guns doesn't do anything to stop the criminals from getting weapons if they really want to. Even if private citizens can't access the guns the criminals still can smuggle them in or however the hell they do it. All this really stops is school shootings because some douchebag kid that should have been aborted can't take Daddy's rifle and shoot up his school.

Also the school shootings couldn't really be stopped even if you allowed conceal carry because the government won't even allow you to wear a chain on your wallet in a school anymore. There is no way they would allow anyone to step foot on property knowing they had a gun on them for protection.
View user's profileSend private message
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 08:39 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I know it's cliched, but "if you outlaw guns, then only outlaws will have guns". Gun control would not keep criminals from getting guns. Criminals don't get their guns legally anyways. For the record, you do not have "free access to guns" in the US. It's actually pretty tough to get a licensed firearm, and you do need to demonstrate you can use it in some places.

School shootings is an entirely different thing, and I do agree that children having easy access to guns through their parents is a problem. I think it's more of a cultural thing, though. American schools are really fucked up places.

Quote:
Let's me honest here you say guns are used for personal protection. It hasn't done much good in protecting anyone at all these school shootings.

How are you supposed to protect a -school- this way? Give the kids weapons?

Quote:
How often do you hear in the news of people shooting their attackers who attempt to kill them, never.

Wrong. And that doesn't mean it doesn't happen. Just like any news story, for it to be reported, it has to be interesting or out of the ordinary. Just like every robbery or attack doesn't make the news, neither does every foiled attack.

And usually, these things don't end in someone getting shot. You pull a gun on someone, they either stop right there, or run like hell.

For the record, I have worked with and spoken to people who have used their firearms to stop a crime or protect someone.

In short, it's a double-edged coin. The availability of firearms makes firearms-related crime more likely, but firearm-carrying civilians deter or stop crime.

(and don't tell me there's no problems with gun crime in Ireland: http://mafiatoday.com/general-breaking-news/rate-of-irish-gun-killings-five-times-that-of-england-study/ )
View user's profileSend private message
Alowishus
Joined: Aug 04 2009
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 08:44 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Beach Bum wrote:
We don't really have "free access" to guns. You have to jump through a bunch of hoops that the government has set up to get one legally.


Well that's what i meant, i didn't think you just go to your local supermarket and throw one into the trolley lol.

Beach Bum wrote:
The problem is that criminals don't bother to jump through these hoops they either steal them or buy them from the person who did. It is my opinion that restricting access to guns doesn't do anything to stop the criminals from getting weapons if they really want to.


I can't disagree with this. Paramilitaries here imported their guns from outside Ireland though.

Beach Bum wrote:
Even if private citizens can't access the guns the criminals still can smuggle them in or however the hell they do it. All this really stops is school shootings because some douchebag kid that should have been aborted can't take Daddy's rifle and shoot up his school.


But is that not good enough? Reducing that alone is a good thing.

Look at it this way. Throughout the whole world criminals have access to guns, it doesn't matter what country. Yet all those countries which don't permit the ownership of guns still function perfectly fine. Not to say that criminals don't shoot people but the number of incidents is still really quite low.

Beach Bum wrote:

Also the school shootings couldn't really be stopped even if you allowed conceal carry because the government won't even allow you to wear a chain on your wallet in a school anymore. There is no way they would allow anyone to step foot on property knowing they had a gun on them for protection.


The response of the government like that is because of the shootings though and as you said the people who do the school shootings are some kid who has access to daddys gun. If there was no access to daddys gun it could be avoided altogether.

Realistically there is only two scenarios i can think of currently that would work.

1. Get rid of the ability to require guns legally, this would then reduce the number of people with access to guns and would help alleviate the problem. Of course the criminals still have access.

2. This is what seems to be get done but needs done more. Allow legal carrying of guns but increase the security ridiculously. Searches all the time etc.

I think 1. is the more ideal scenario but i do recognise it has problems. I don't mean this to sound rude about the USA (i am really fond of the US) but there does seem to be alot of poor people about and they are probably the ones who commit the most crimes. I've said this before to people here on IRC, quite a long time ago in fact but we are really different cultures. I am sure alot of people in the US don't have or can't afford insurance. If everyone had insurance the gun-crime problem could sort of be fixed.

Let's be honest how likely is it that a criminal is going to break into your house just to shoot you? Very very unlikely unless you royally pissed them off or did something to them. They most likely are going to rob you.

I see on a number of sites that people say they would just get their shotgun or whatever and start shooting at the person for being on their land or stealing shit. If you had insurance there would be no problem with this as it would cover it and there would be no shooting of anyone. They are not going to burst into your house and shoot you and steal your stuff. I've been robbed before, the insurance just sorted it out.

I think this has a lot to do with economic and social problems within the USA.

EDIT:

This is aimed at Usa.

Note the bottom line here.

In the Republic there were 1.63 homicides per 100,000 in 2006 and 1.95 per 100,000 in 2007. This compared with 1.42 per 100,000 in England and Wales in 2005-2006.

While the rate of gun killings was higher than in England and Wales, the number of such crimes was still relatively small and Ireland was far from a “pistolised” society, such as the US.

I am not saying there isn't gun crime, that would be stupid of me. I am saying that it is rarely reported or heard of. Besides the figures aren't really that much different between England and Wales and Ireland.

You must appreciate that even though there was a peace process here there is still a lot of paramilitary and sectarian attacks that go on here and also that the attacks documented there are most likely not from the public.

Look here's a sectarian attack in the news here today.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-12161396
View user's profileSend private message
Beach Bum
Joined: Dec 08 2010
Location: At the pants party.
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 08:48 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I don't think that insurance has anything to do with it. If someone broke into my home, I'm not going to stop and ask, "Hey you planning to shoot me or are you just robbing me?" I'm going to shoot first and ask questions later. Plus even if they were just robbing me, I happen to like my computer and it ain't going anywhere without a fight.
View user's profileSend private message
Alowishus
Joined: Aug 04 2009
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 09:01 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Beach Bum wrote:
I don't think that insurance has anything to do with it. If someone broke into my home, I'm not going to stop and ask, "Hey you planning to shoot me or are you just robbing me?" I'm going to shoot first and ask questions later. Plus even if they were just robbing me, I happen to like my computer and it ain't going anywhere without a fight.


Woah woah woah.

This is what is exactly what i'm trying to say.

First obviously you don't want your shit to get stolen.

But the fact is you are shooting someone, hurting them and possibly even killing them when you could let them take your stuff and get it covered by your insurance and getting it replaced.

I know this sounds odd that you are letting people just rob you but you have to appreciate sure this person may be shit and total dirt to you after they are stealing your stuff but they are still fundamentally a human being and you have killed them.

I don't know how to say this without sounding horrible so forgive me if i do but maybe people in the US are more attached to their possessions.

This isn't to say that e.g. my computer is getting stolen - i don't want to lose all my files, music, work etc. but it's still just a computer and if i had it insured it could get replaced. I've seen from my time i've spent in America that there is a lot of poor people in America (hell when i visited last year i overheard a guy talking on his phone about not having $50 to repair his car) and that people often work 2 jobs or even 3.

Because of this i can see why people don't want to lose their possessions if they have to save lots of money to be able to afford them. They are really their pride and joy. Like you know that feeling when you save up and buy something yourself. Like my first guitar i would hate for that to get stolen since i bought it all by myself, some people feel t his away about their cars etc.

I can see that being a huge burden for some people in the USA so that's why they do attack people but i wouldn't feel comfortable shooting and killing someone over it. For these people however and when thats all they have i can understand it.

Like i said, totally different cultures here.
View user's profileSend private message
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 09:08 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Beach Bum wrote:
I'm going to shoot first and ask questions later.

This is not legal. For one thing, how do you know the person you're shooting isn't a relative or someone with a reason to be in your house?

You're allowed to use a gun to protect your property, but you're not allowed to fire it at someone who isn't threatening you. They are not a threat if their hands are full of computer. Feel free to pistol-whip them though.
View user's profileSend private message
Klimbatize
2010 NES Champ
Title: 2011 Picnic/Death Champ
Joined: Mar 15 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 09:13 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I agree with Alowishus in this thread more than I do the Americans. I'd go into it more, but I'm too lazy...just like a typical American.

Basically, I didn't want to just type "This" over and over again.


Pretty much the greatest thread of all time: http://www.sydlexia.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=14789

Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
SNESGuy
Title: El Duderino
Joined: Jul 31 2010
Location: Da D.C
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 09:16 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Ive taken two gun safety courses and i will say that i believe in concealment permits. Actually not too long ago my friend told me a story about his dad's construction business. Apparently he has hired alot of ex-cons and immigrants in the past but they have being hard working, good employee's etc. However, his dad does have the permit for having a concealed weapon and is equipped with one at work just in case anybody goes nuts. Well one day someone did go nuts, apparently someone that had been fired a week earlier came to the site, armed, and demanded his paycheck. My friends saw him out of the trailer he was in, pulled out his weapon, and came behind the guy. The crazed man didnt see him but felt a gun at his side and dropped his weapon, he was then subdued. Quite a story.
While i believe that no average citizen should be able to have a concealed weapon, with proper and PROFESSIONAL training, i think its right.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
Beach Bum
Joined: Dec 08 2010
Location: At the pants party.
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 09:18 pm Reply with quote Back to top

UsaSatsui wrote:
Beach Bum wrote:
I'm going to shoot first and ask questions later.

This is not legal. For one thing, how do you know the person you're shooting isn't a relative or someone with a reason to be in your house?

You're allowed to use a gun to protect your property, but you're not allowed to fire it at someone who isn't threatening you. They are not a threat if their hands are full of computer. Feel free to pistol-whip them though.


It wouldn't be a pistol lol. If you break in my house you are staring down the barrel of an AK-47. Shocked
View user's profileSend private message
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 10:14 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Beach Bum wrote:
UsaSatsui wrote:
Beach Bum wrote:
I'm going to shoot first and ask questions later.

This is not legal. For one thing, how do you know the person you're shooting isn't a relative or someone with a reason to be in your house?

You're allowed to use a gun to protect your property, but you're not allowed to fire it at someone who isn't threatening you. They are not a threat if their hands are full of computer. Feel free to pistol-whip them though.


It wouldn't be a pistol lol. If you break in my house you are staring down the barrel of an AK-47. Shocked

Oh, nevermind. If you're using an illegal weapon to perform an illegal act, you get off on the "Two Wrongs Make A Right" doctrine.
View user's profileSend private message
Beach Bum
Joined: Dec 08 2010
Location: At the pants party.
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 11:18 pm Reply with quote Back to top

It isn't illegal the weapon is registered properly. My grandfather is an ex-marine that runs a weapon trading business and I got it from him. Just because it is an assault rifle doesn't mean you can't own one contrary to popular belief. Crazy, I know.
View user's profileSend private message
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 11:24 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Beach Bum wrote:
It isn't illegal the weapon is registered properly. My grandfather is an ex-marine that runs a weapon trading business and I got it from him. Just because it is an assault rifle doesn't mean you can't own one contrary to popular belief. Crazy, I know.

Not in this state.
View user's profileSend private message
Doddsino
Joined: Oct 01 2009
PostPosted: Jan 11 2011 11:55 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I see no reason in having semi-automatic weapons, are you planning on shooting a line of people? Anything more than 10 bullets is really pointless. And I say this as someone who is pro 2nd Amendment.
View user's profileSend private message
Sarge
Title: The Self-Titler
Joined: Aug 14 2010
PostPosted: Jan 12 2011 12:33 am Reply with quote Back to top

I prefer the M9. You may need 15 rounds when you have to use full metal jacketed rounds.
Quote:
I see no reason in having semi-automatic weapons

Always use bolt-action? Shotgun? Or do you mean automatic?


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
Dr. Strangelove
Joined: Dec 30 2010
Location: Salt Lake City
PostPosted: Jan 12 2011 12:39 am Reply with quote Back to top

Beach Bum wrote:
I'm going to shoot first and ask questions later.


IMO, it's not the gun or prevalence of guns that is the problem, it's the mindset behind the trigger, and this mindset is possibly the worst kind. While I don't have the data (and am too lazy right now to look it up) I'm sure more Americans die from accidental shootings than mass murders. Sure, a gun would be handy in a night burgler situation, but I'm would at least try to figure out what the hell is going on before I start firing. In this Arizona case, a man with a gun suddenly feels like superman or John McClaine or something and runs towards gunfire in order to be a big hero. In hindsight, he could have done absolutely nothing at best and killed innocents at worst. Hell, how good was his aim? And in the night burgler case, how good is your nightvision?

My nearly-blind, nearly-deaf and easily startled grandmother who lives in a gated community wants a pistol, and that scares the shit out of me. Her neighbor answers the door with a shotgun. The only opportunity either of them will have to use their guns is in the accidental slaying of some poor girl scout.
Sarge wrote:

Always use bolt-action? Shotgun? Or do you mean automatic?


I think he mean "semi-automatic assault rifles" but i'm not 100% sure
View user's profileSend private message
Doddsino
Joined: Oct 01 2009
PostPosted: Jan 12 2011 02:18 am Reply with quote Back to top

Yeah, that's what I meant. I've fired them before and it's completely pointless to have it in a situation if you were to take on one person in a closed environment like a house, unless you want to damage more stuff than the crook would.
View user's profileSend private message
aeonic
Title: Sporadic Poster
Joined: Nov 19 2009
Location: Kissimmee, FL
PostPosted: Jan 12 2011 08:59 am Reply with quote Back to top

I find it funny that the whole thread was started by someone coming from a country that nearly succeeded in having a few rival factions blow it back to kingdom come, likely in his lifetime. Not to mention that their incidences of assault with bladed weapons are hugely inflated because they can't have guns. I'm with Usa on the whole "if you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns". Most Americans are very responsible gun owners, and if that nutjob hadn't had access to one, who knows what he'd have done instead. Stick of dynamite? Poison? You can't predict crazy.


Who likes role-playing games? Me. Way too goddamn much.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Lady_Satine
Title: Head of Lexian R&D
Joined: Oct 15 2005
Location: Metro area, Georgia
PostPosted: Jan 12 2011 11:23 am Reply with quote Back to top

Doddsino wrote:
I see no reason in having semi-automatic weapons, are you planning on shooting a line of people?

2nded.


"Life is a waste of time. Time is a waste of life. Get wasted all the time, and you'll have the time of your life!"
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Dr. Strangelove
Joined: Dec 30 2010
Location: Salt Lake City
PostPosted: Jan 12 2011 11:36 am Reply with quote Back to top

aeonic wrote:
I find it funny that the whole thread was started by someone coming from a country that nearly succeeded in having a few rival factions blow it back to kingdom come, likely in his lifetime. Not to mention that their incidences of assault with bladed weapons are hugely inflated because they can't have guns. I'm with Usa on the whole "if you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns". Most Americans are very responsible gun owners, and if that nutjob hadn't had access to one, who knows what he'd have done instead. Stick of dynamite? Poison? You can't predict crazy.


As strange as my state is, Utah is in fact part of the USA
View user's profileSend private message
aeonic
Title: Sporadic Poster
Joined: Nov 19 2009
Location: Kissimmee, FL
PostPosted: Jan 12 2011 11:46 am Reply with quote Back to top

Dr. Strangelove wrote:
aeonic wrote:
I find it funny that the whole thread was started by someone coming from a country that nearly succeeded in having a few rival factions blow it back to kingdom come, likely in his lifetime. Not to mention that their incidences of assault with bladed weapons are hugely inflated because they can't have guns. I'm with Usa on the whole "if you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns". Most Americans are very responsible gun owners, and if that nutjob hadn't had access to one, who knows what he'd have done instead. Stick of dynamite? Poison? You can't predict crazy.


As strange as my state is, Utah is in fact part of the USA


True, but there's a different type of societal influence thanks to the Zion Curtain.


Who likes role-playing games? Me. Way too goddamn much.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Dr. Strangelove
Joined: Dec 30 2010
Location: Salt Lake City
PostPosted: Jan 12 2011 02:10 pm Reply with quote Back to top

aeonic wrote:
Dr. Strangelove wrote:
aeonic wrote:
I find it funny that the whole thread was started by someone coming from a country that nearly succeeded in having a few rival factions blow it back to kingdom come, likely in his lifetime. Not to mention that their incidences of assault with bladed weapons are hugely inflated because they can't have guns. I'm with Usa on the whole "if you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns". Most Americans are very responsible gun owners, and if that nutjob hadn't had access to one, who knows what he'd have done instead. Stick of dynamite? Poison? You can't predict crazy.


As strange as my state is, Utah is in fact part of the USA


True, but there's a different type of societal influence thanks to the Zion Curtain.


+100 points for having heard of the Zion Curtain. I'm impressed.

Next Question Utah for 200 points: This is a place commonly referred to as "Happy Valley"
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: