SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
Dear Tea Party and Christine O'Donnell


Reply to topic
Author Message
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
PostPosted: Oct 24 2010 09:33 am Reply with quote Back to top

I'm sorry, did I say lrn 2 geography?

I also meant lrn 2 politics.
View user's profileSend private message
Blackout
Title: Captain Oblivious
Joined: Sep 01 2007
Location: That Rainy State
PostPosted: Oct 24 2010 10:50 am Reply with quote Back to top

lordsathien wrote:
Wait'll Anthrax finds out that Democratic Socialism isn't an oxymoron. My country on nationstates (Scray) was that way for a while.

A friend I made in jury duty last week said the following "I bet in ten years, we'll see four parties in this country: Republican. Democrat, Communist, and Tea Party."

Why not, we had Wigs at one point! Razz



 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM AddressYahoo MessengerMSN Messenger
JRA
Joined: Sep 17 2007
Location: The Opium Trail
PostPosted: Oct 24 2010 11:58 am Reply with quote Back to top

Wow, this thread is still going? I figured I'd get at best two posts of either "gay" or "cute", or maybe a lol if I was really lucky, then Jeebus would come in and be all like "this thread blows" and lock it.


There are a lot of what if's in life Donny. What if I hit you really hard in the face, knocked yo shit to the back of yo skull? What if I....had you girl gargle my nuts? The fact remains, you are a fuckin mutant.
 
View user's profileSend private message
bassguy252
Title: Professional Malcontent
Joined: May 26 2010
Location: Mount Dhoom!!!!!!!
PostPosted: Oct 24 2010 01:28 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Anthraxinsoup wrote:
UsaSatsui wrote:
Simply because they have socialist aspects to their government does not make them a socialist government.

We have social security, unemployment insurance, and protected labor unions, for example.
Ok, but Norway is considered pretty much damn socialism, socialism means all the great things plus SOME private stuff.


Sweden would of been a much better example and you can have socialist govermnets that still use a capitalist economy.


That was your big mistake, comparing socalism and capitalism is like comparing an orange to a violin, economic systems and forms of goverment are completely different

Even China a Communist country relies on aspects of a capitalist economy for income... see? Economic System... form of goverment

now the United States is a two party republic if memory serves me correctly, Canada's form of government is quite different, a constitutional monarchy, however... both are captialist countries because of their economic systems, get what im saying?


Let's assume it's a mixture of the two!


 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM AddressYahoo MessengerMSN Messenger
SoldierHawk
Moderator
Title: Warrior-Poet
Joined: Jan 15 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Oct 24 2010 04:02 pm Reply with quote Back to top

phantasmzombie wrote:
Kinda falls flat since Shawn Michaels is a Republican.

O'Donnell never had a chance. But I'm pretty sure the Tea Party will be smiling ear to ear in November.

Yeah, but HBK always = win, regardless of his politics (at least for me.)


militarysignatures.com

William Shakespeare wrote:
Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none.

 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
PostPosted: Oct 24 2010 06:28 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I still think the Tea Party is a parody of overzealous third parties.


I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Greg the White
Joined: Apr 09 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Oct 24 2010 06:50 pm Reply with quote Back to top

It's funny to me, because they advertise themselves as a group of "All different kinds of Americans," or something, when it's mostly old white people who lean right to different degrees (all 139 or so of their candidates are Republican). Ultimately, they're just going to steal votes from Republicans (in the vein of Nader, other third parties), and put themselves back at square one.


So here's to you Mrs. Robinson. People love you more- oh, nevermind.
 
View user's profileSend private message
JRA
Joined: Sep 17 2007
Location: The Opium Trail
PostPosted: Oct 24 2010 08:06 pm Reply with quote Back to top

SoldierHawk wrote:
phantasmzombie wrote:
Kinda falls flat since Shawn Michaels is a Republican.

O'Donnell never had a chance. But I'm pretty sure the Tea Party will be smiling ear to ear in November.

Yeah, but HBK always = win, regardless of his politics (at least for me.)


thank you. Very Happy


There are a lot of what if's in life Donny. What if I hit you really hard in the face, knocked yo shit to the back of yo skull? What if I....had you girl gargle my nuts? The fact remains, you are a fuckin mutant.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Ash Burton
Title: AshRaiser
Joined: Nov 10 2008
Location: Florida
PostPosted: Oct 24 2010 08:20 pm Reply with quote Back to top

If your getting any information on politics from wrestling, you are probably a republican already. That, and Shawn Michaels is the man.


Image

joshwoodzy wrote:
Ash is probably just home humping his SNES collection.

 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
PostPosted: Oct 24 2010 08:53 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Greg the White wrote:
It's funny to me, because they advertise themselves as a group of "All different kinds of Americans," or something, when it's mostly old white people who lean right to different degrees (all 139 or so of their candidates are Republican). Ultimately, they're just going to steal votes from Republicans (in the vein of Nader, other third parties), and put themselves back at square one.

Tell that to my mom.


I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
SoldierHawk
Moderator
Title: Warrior-Poet
Joined: Jan 15 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Oct 24 2010 11:07 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I'm not a Republican, but HBK is indeed The Man. (On an unrelated note, it pisses me of to NO END that his retirement speech wasn't an extra on the WM XXVI DVD. I will forgive them only if they release another HBK DVD, and soon, with that on it. Bastards.)

It'll probably surprise no one, but I'm not a fan of the Tea Party. Although it seems to be a relatively small amount of "tea partiers" who are this way, those TPers who seem dangerously violent, racist and intolerant scare the piss out of me. There are plenty of non-TPers who are that way of course, but aren't nearly as publicized/organized.


militarysignatures.com

William Shakespeare wrote:
Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none.

 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website
Pandajuice
Title: The Power of Grayskull
Joined: Oct 30 2008
Location: US and UK
PostPosted: Oct 25 2010 05:46 am Reply with quote Back to top

Are we still talking about Christine O'Donell? Cuz she's kind of hot for a potential Senator. I'm just sayin'.
View user's profileSend private message
Blackout
Title: Captain Oblivious
Joined: Sep 01 2007
Location: That Rainy State
PostPosted: Oct 25 2010 11:45 am Reply with quote Back to top

Has anyone shopped this yet?
Image



 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM AddressYahoo MessengerMSN Messenger
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
PostPosted: Oct 25 2010 12:46 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Too easy.


I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Oct 25 2010 12:55 pm Reply with quote Back to top

SoldierHawk wrote:
It'll probably surprise no one, but I'm not a fan of the Tea Party. Although it seems to be a relatively small amount of "tea partiers" who are this way, those TPers who seem dangerously violent, racist and intolerant scare the piss out of me.

I'm not a fan of the Tea Party, but the media and the President himself have gone out of their way to misrepresent the tea party as violent, intolerant, and racist. I personally don't like them because I feel that they are myopic, poorly organized, that their message is unrefined and nonspecific, and they are essentially attempting a hostile takeover of the Republican Party. They're like a group of kids who just turned 14. They want to fuck, and they want to fuck all the time. Unfortunately, they don't really know what fucking is and when they finally get the opportunity to fuck, they end up embarassing themselves and everyone finds out about it.

Also, the Tea Party is not a third party. They seem to be constantly mispresented as such, largely because of their name. But they are the actually the Tea Party MOVEMENT, and they are a populist movement from within the Republican/Libertarian parties.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
SoldierHawk
Moderator
Title: Warrior-Poet
Joined: Jan 15 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Oct 25 2010 01:00 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I don't think they're going out of their way to misrepresent them as violent--I think a (admittedly small minority) of them ARE violent, and are using this Tea Party thing as both a voice and an excuse to organize. The media and their opponents, as is always the case in politics, are focusing in on the truly nutcase minority. That doesn't make the nutcases any less scary.

But for the most part, I agree. They're petulant and have no real message other than "ARRRRRG! TAX BAD OBAMA BAD ARRRRRG!"

I also don't like the way they're holding Republicans who don't agree with them hostage, as it were.


militarysignatures.com

William Shakespeare wrote:
Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none.

 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website
JoshWoodzy
Joined: May 22 2008
Location: Goshen, VA
PostPosted: Oct 25 2010 01:32 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I don't think they are intelligent enough to actually know what to do if they ever gained any senate seats. It's also hard to take anyone seriously who holds a big sign up that says "By Ballot or Bullet, Revolution is coming", and we can't pretend that at least half of the people that go to these rallies aren't at least slightly racist. So to say that violence isn't a part of the tea party mindset is not entirely correct.

The ones who are heading this whole unorganized mess may not promote violence, true. But the unintelligent followers and the redneck masses have no problem hiding their racism or violent tendencies, and the people who run these things should at least be like "Hey, rednecks, could you please stop saying the N word and saying you are gonna assassinate Nancy Pelosi, the real world has stopped taking us seriously because of you".


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Deadmau_5pra
Title: Amatuer film/podcaster
Joined: Feb 10 2009
Location: Chicago Area
PostPosted: Oct 25 2010 02:06 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
SoldierHawk wrote:
It'll probably surprise no one, but I'm not a fan of the Tea Party. Although it seems to be a relatively small amount of "tea partiers" who are this way, those TPers who seem dangerously violent, racist and intolerant scare the piss out of me.

I'm not a fan of the Tea Party, but the media and the President himself have gone out of their way to misrepresent the tea party as violent, intolerant, and racist. I personally don't like them because I feel that they are myopic, poorly organized, that their message is unrefined and nonspecific, and they are essentially attempting a hostile takeover of the Republican Party. They're like a group of kids who just turned 14. They want to fuck, and they want to fuck all the time. Unfortunately, they don't really know what fucking is and when they finally get the opportunity to fuck, they end up embarrassing themselves and everyone finds out about it.

Also, the Tea Party is not a third party. They seem to be constantly misrepresented as such, largely because of their name. But they are the actually the Tea Party MOVEMENT, and they are a populist movement from within the Republican/Libertarian parties.


I thought they were a branch of the Constitution Party?


Image and video hosting by TinyPic
 
View user's profileSend private message
Greg the White
Joined: Apr 09 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Oct 25 2010 04:10 pm Reply with quote Back to top

SpraCoalee wrote:
Syd Lexia wrote:
SoldierHawk wrote:
It'll probably surprise no one, but I'm not a fan of the Tea Party. Although it seems to be a relatively small amount of "tea partiers" who are this way, those TPers who seem dangerously violent, racist and intolerant scare the piss out of me.

I'm not a fan of the Tea Party, but the media and the President himself have gone out of their way to misrepresent the tea party as violent, intolerant, and racist. I personally don't like them because I feel that they are myopic, poorly organized, that their message is unrefined and nonspecific, and they are essentially attempting a hostile takeover of the Republican Party. They're like a group of kids who just turned 14. They want to fuck, and they want to fuck all the time. Unfortunately, they don't really know what fucking is and when they finally get the opportunity to fuck, they end up embarrassing themselves and everyone finds out about it.

Also, the Tea Party is not a third party. They seem to be constantly misrepresented as such, largely because of their name. But they are the actually the Tea Party MOVEMENT, and they are a populist movement from within the Republican/Libertarian parties.


I thought they were a branch of the Constitution Party?

It's complicated. Started by intellectual Libertarians under Ron Paul, the Tea Parties turned from small groups of Libertarians, to town halls screaming "Keep your government hands off my Medicare," to large groups of average dumbasses manipulated by conservative Republican interests. Tell them that Obama gave the middle class tax cuts, and they'll laugh because that hot chick on Fox told that their taxes skyrocketed. Tell them Obama has put forward legislation to reform the practices that lead to the meltdown, and they'll think that he finally stopped letting negroes get loans. In the end, this will be the same as any third party:

1) survives to an incredibly small degree, similar to other third parties, ultimately stealing votes from the right side (such as Nader taking the very-left away from the Dems).

2) Dead. Maybe it was run by the intellectuals at first, but ultimately, it's now in the hands of fat, mustachioed Midwesterners, and people who think Palin's "Smarter than she lets on." Either way, the intellectuals will see they've lost control and quit, and the public will eventually quit when they see that their candidates will end up like Rand Paul, starting out as principled anti-progressives, but ultimately puppets of the Republican party.


So here's to you Mrs. Robinson. People love you more- oh, nevermind.
 
View user's profileSend private message
JRA
Joined: Sep 17 2007
Location: The Opium Trail
PostPosted: Oct 26 2010 08:07 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Doddsino wrote:
LOL...greatest thread ever.


How the hell did I miss this fabulous and highly contributive post? Image


There are a lot of what if's in life Donny. What if I hit you really hard in the face, knocked yo shit to the back of yo skull? What if I....had you girl gargle my nuts? The fact remains, you are a fuckin mutant.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: