SydLexia.com - The Forums :: View topic - Wikileaks to release 400,000 Secret Documents on Iraq

Posted: Oct 18 2010 02:00 pm

http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/10/18/wikileaks-to-release-secret-iraq-documents/?hpt=T2

I'm sorry, but isn't this considered Espionage? Constantly releasing Classified US Documents?

Complete horseshit. Terrorist.

Posted: Oct 18 2010 02:45 pm

Fucking bullshit, I hate how wiki leaks has become well known, I use too go on it two or three years ago when some other NS friend's linked me there.

Posted: Oct 18 2010 03:17 pm

Its a damn shame what there doing

Posted: Oct 18 2010 10:24 pm

Those motherfuckers published the names of current informants??

Unfathomable and inexcusable. I'm all for freedom of speech and information, but that does no good, and only harms. Get a brain, fucktard, and then take your site of the damn net.

Posted: Oct 18 2010 10:55 pm

Are these classified documents?

The title says 'secret documents' and the text just says 'documents'. It seems like they're intentionally not calling them classified... so I assume they're not classified.

Posted: Oct 19 2010 02:33 am

Shit they're releasing that's come and gone already? Good

Endangering the lives of the troops? That's No good. These idoits should be shut down immediately.

Posted: Oct 19 2010 03:45 am

Shit the terrorist have computers now? Ahh fuck we're all dead!

Posted: Oct 19 2010 09:04 am

Isn't anyone else disturbed that the Government is having trouble keeping classified documents classified?

Posted: Oct 19 2010 09:29 am

Rogue Hippo wrote:

Are these classified documents?

The title says 'secret documents' and the text just says 'documents'. It seems like they're intentionally not calling them classified... so I assume they're not classified.

Maybe I read this diffrent due to the fact that I have a clearance, but the 3 classifications are
Confidential
Secret
Top Secret

So when I read it, first thing that pops into my head is SECRET classified material.
I could be wrong. Either way, releasing informants names is straight up fucked.

Blackout wrote:

Isn't anyone else disturbed that the Government is having trouble keeping classified documents classified?

Sadly it really isn't that hard to get stuff out if you have access to it. Confused

Posted: Oct 19 2010 01:31 pm

I love how WikiLeaks insists on doing this like it has to and acts surprised when anyone claims what they're doing is wrong. I also like how they declare that they're about to commit treason publicly well before they do it, as if they're daring someone to do something about it. They're like the new Pirate Bay.

Posted: Oct 19 2010 03:32 pm

The-Excel wrote:

I love how WikiLeaks insists on doing this like it has to and acts surprised when anyone claims what they're doing is wrong. I also like how they declare that they're about to commit treason publicly well before they do it, as if they're daring someone to do something about it. They're like the new Pirate Bay.

You leave them out of this! They just wanted people to get movies and games and other media like it was meant to be: less than cheap. How dare thee sully their name!

Posted: Oct 19 2010 03:48 pm

Atma wrote:

Rogue Hippo wrote:

Are these classified documents?

The title says 'secret documents' and the text just says 'documents'. It seems like they're intentionally not calling them classified... so I assume they're not classified.

Maybe I read this diffrent due to the fact that I have a clearance, but the 3 classifications are
Confidential
Secret
Top Secret

So when I read it, first thing that pops into my head is SECRET classified material.
I could be wrong. Either way, releasing informants names is straight up fucked.

Ditto, and completely agree.

Off topic, but I'm curious now: are you an officer? Or is it a function of your MOS that you need clearance?

Posted: Oct 19 2010 07:36 pm

I fucking remember back when Wikileaks wasn't known about much a year or two ago. I loved it, they had documents out the ass from israel, saved 'em all, now that the fucking news got their hands on it they only do america=(

Title: The Self-Titler Joined: Aug 14 2010 Posts: 598

I had to get a secret clearance on entrance to a service academy. I got some real sweet "SECRET" information on the capabilities of our weather satellites, but I probably slept through half the briefing.

Posted: Oct 19 2010 10:03 pm

Sarge wrote:

I had to get a secret clearance on entrance to a service academy. I got some real sweet "SECRET" information on the capabilities of our weather satellites, but I probably slept through half the briefing.

I live on a TOP secret military base. NORAD and shit is here, my step dad does shit, it's still gay though, I could care less what america is doing in some crappy shit hole.

UsaSatsui's Youtube Channel · Posted: Oct 19 2010 10:09 pm

Feh, I had Secret clearance when I worked for TSA (and since it supposedly lasts for 10 years, I think I still have it). I never got anything that was actually classified though, just "sensitive security information".

Posted: Oct 19 2010 10:29 pm

UsaSatsui wrote:

Feh, I had Secret clearance when I worked for TSA (and since it supposedly lasts for 10 years, I think I still have it). I never got anything that was actually classified though, just "sensitive security information".

Secret is just a really good paper check, I could get it if I wanted.

Posted: Oct 19 2010 10:45 pm

UsaSatsui wrote:

Feh, I had Secret clearance when I worked for TSA (and since it supposedly lasts for 10 years, I think I still have it). I never got anything that was actually classified though, just "sensitive security information".

Yeah, I had to get one too to get into officer's training. Secret really doesn't mean much; the good stuff happens at Top Secret.

I was just curious about Atma because--unless they have a specific MI job--the majority of Enlisted guys don't need one (in my experience.) I would think that means he's either part of the Intel community, a higher-ranking NCO, or an officer. Curious which one.

Posted: Oct 19 2010 11:08 pm

SoldierHawk wrote:

UsaSatsui wrote:

Feh, I had Secret clearance when I worked for TSA (and since it supposedly lasts for 10 years, I think I still have it). I never got anything that was actually classified though, just "sensitive security information".

Yeah, I had to get one too to get into officer's training. Secret really doesn't mean much; the good stuff happens at Top Secret.

I was just curious about Atma because--unless they have a specific MI job--the majority of Enlisted guys don't need one (in my experience.) I would think that means he's either part of the Intel community, a higher-ranking NCO, or an officer. Curious which one.

My step dad works at NORAD, he's just a sarge, but he has a top secret.

Posted: Oct 19 2010 11:40 pm

Anthraxinsoup wrote:

SoldierHawk wrote:

UsaSatsui wrote:

Feh, I had Secret clearance when I worked for TSA (and since it supposedly lasts for 10 years, I think I still have it). I never got anything that was actually classified though, just "sensitive security information".

Yeah, I had to get one too to get into officer's training. Secret really doesn't mean much; the good stuff happens at Top Secret.

I was just curious about Atma because--unless they have a specific MI job--the majority of Enlisted guys don't need one (in my experience.) I would think that means he's either part of the Intel community, a higher-ranking NCO, or an officer. Curious which one.

My step dad works at NORAD, he's just a sarge, but he has a top secret.

I bet your step dad's top secret is that he doesn't like you.

Posted: Oct 19 2010 11:40 pm

Dr. Jeebus wrote:

Anthraxinsoup wrote:

SoldierHawk wrote:

UsaSatsui wrote:

Feh, I had Secret clearance when I worked for TSA (and since it supposedly lasts for 10 years, I think I still have it). I never got anything that was actually classified though, just "sensitive security information".

Yeah, I had to get one too to get into officer's training. Secret really doesn't mean much; the good stuff happens at Top Secret.

I was just curious about Atma because--unless they have a specific MI job--the majority of Enlisted guys don't need one (in my experience.) I would think that means he's either part of the Intel community, a higher-ranking NCO, or an officer. Curious which one.

My step dad works at NORAD, he's just a sarge, but he has a top secret.

I bet your step dad's top secret is that he doesn't like you.

He really doesn't Smile

Posted: Oct 20 2010 12:15 am

What if this is all just a ruse to get everyone to accept the ability to shut down the internet?! OH NO, NO MORE PRAWNS AND MEMES!

Posted: Oct 20 2010 12:37 am

With something like NORAD, it makes sense he needs a Top Secret clearance. I'm sure even the little PV1s need one for something like that.

Posted: Oct 20 2010 12:55 am

SoldierHawk wrote:

With something like NORAD, it makes sense he needs a Top Secret clearance. I'm sure even the little PV1s need one for something like that.

Have to be a e-3 or above to work at NORAD. I never see any thing below E-3

Posted: Oct 20 2010 12:58 am

Totally unacceptable. Is anyone being held accountable for all this crap or what?