SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
Titanic in 3D


Reply to topic
Author Message
Alowishus
Joined: Aug 04 2009
PostPosted: Mar 19 2010 10:56 am Reply with quote Back to top

sidewaydriver wrote:
I had a feeling they'd do a rerelease right before the sequel comes out.


Hahaha that was great except at the very end where it said Titanic sank in 1919 when it was 1912 and if Rose was born in 1899 she would have been 13 years old.
View user's profileSend private message
Mr. Bomberman
2009 Forum Champion
Title: (still) token black.
Joined: Jan 27 2006
Location: Home of the lost towers
PostPosted: Mar 19 2010 01:02 pm Reply with quote Back to top

FMV games were a dumb idea.

But I also say bring the 3D on-- Unlike in the 50s, 60s, and 80's, they have the technology now to make it actually look good.


Image
Xbox Live: HazNobody, pronounced "HAz". | Haven't went to IRC yet? Go! #sydlexia @ DALnet. | Y'all should play some Super Robot Wars J (hey that rhymes!) | yeah I'm back who gives a shit
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
AtmanRyu
Title: The Wandering Dragon
Joined: Jun 25 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
PostPosted: Mar 19 2010 01:33 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Mr. Bomberman wrote:
FMVs were a dumb idea.

But I also say bring the 3D on-- Unlike in the 50s, 60s, and 80's, they have the technology now to make it actually look good.


To be honest, I am aware that 3D finally advanced properly.

I'm just against the idea that any movie + 3D = Oscar Winner (thank goodness that didn't happen...).

My whole thing against Avatar is just the same as the whole thing with FF VII: People hyped the hell out of it, and by the time I get to try it out, backlash kicks in:

"Yeah, it's good, but it's not the masterpiece you claim it is..."

Plus Avatar has probably the biggest gathering of fantards ever since Naruto came out.

Back in topic, for the time being, 3D should be optional, not a requirement, hence the movie should be able to stand out on its on with or without it. If a movie's only good when on it's on 3D, it only means that movie was one dimensional to begin with. Besides, what about those with one functional eye? "3D is here to stay! Sucks to be you!"

And seriously, do you really want any, ANY movie to be in 3D? Do you want that one unfunny annoying actor to become even more annoying by standing right next to you? Do you really want Fan Disservice smearing right in your face?

Just my thoughts.
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteYahoo Messenger
jackfrost
Title: Cold Hearted Bastard
Joined: Feb 21 2009
PostPosted: Mar 20 2010 11:53 pm Reply with quote Back to top

As long as it isn't a crutch used to support a crappy movie I have no issue with 3D. All the 3D movies that have come out lately are also available in 2D, so I don't see the problem. The 3D now is actually decent too, not the red/blue glasses we had to deal with in the early 80s. I really don't understand the whining about it. If you don't want to watch it in 3D then don't do it. You do have a choice, and I personally don't mind it.


[img]http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w204/akajackfrost/megaman.jpg[/img]
 
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: