SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
The Neverending Story to be remade


Reply to topic
Author Message
JoshWoodzy
Joined: May 22 2008
Location: Goshen, VA
PostPosted: Jul 23 2009 01:34 pm Reply with quote Back to top

http://newsinfilm.com/?p=9966

While I think it would be really cool to see this done again, the majority of my brain wants them to leave it alone. I have heard people say the movie is dated and I think that's utter bullshit. I probably watch this movie 3 times a year and I never get tired of it, and I highly doubt a remake would be the same quality.

Thoughts?


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Jul 23 2009 01:36 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I love the original, and I think it holds up well. But I'd watch a remake. But they need to keep the Luck Dragon EXACTLY the same.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Andrew Man
Title: Is a Funklord
Joined: Jan 30 2007
Location: Annandale, VA
PostPosted: Jul 23 2009 02:25 pm Reply with quote Back to top

This movie used to scare the shit out of me as a child.


My Muzaks! CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.facebook.com/hellodharmaband

3DS is very good, and Wii U!

 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Milhouse
Joined: Dec 19 2008
Location: Charlottesville, VA
PostPosted: Jul 23 2009 02:25 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Why are they remaking all of this 1980s stuff?? They need to hurry-up and do a remake of "The Hangover" ...it's already been out for a over month.
View user's profileSend private message
SoldierHawk
Moderator
Title: Warrior-Poet
Joined: Jan 15 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Jul 23 2009 02:57 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
I love the original, and I think it holds up well. But I'd watch a remake. But they need to keep the Luck Dragon EXACTLY the same.

I completely agree. I wouldn't mind if it was updated in terms of graphics, but the look itself needs to be kept.


militarysignatures.com

William Shakespeare wrote:
Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none.

 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website
IceWarm
Joined: Dec 22 2008
Location: Breckenridge, Colorado
PostPosted: Jul 23 2009 03:01 pm Reply with quote Back to top

They better do this movie correctly. I could see it being re-made with some cool CGI elements but it needs to at l;east look and feel like the original.


"Anybody who ever built an empire, or changed the world, sat where you are now. And it’s because they sat there that they were able to do it."

"Fighting in a basement offers a lot of difficulties, number one being, you're fighting in a basement."

"You're Not So Tough Without Your Veggie!"
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
SoldierHawk
Moderator
Title: Warrior-Poet
Joined: Jan 15 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Jul 23 2009 03:04 pm Reply with quote Back to top

IceWarm wrote:
They better do this movie correctly. I could see it being re-made with some cool CGI elements but it needs to at l;east look and feel like the original.


One of the sad things about modern kid's movies, I think, is that *none* of them really 'feel' like the classics we grew up watching (same goes for cartoons, actually.) People are so obsessed with making a buck that they'd rather throw out a bunch of flashy CGI, a few fart jokes, market with McDonalds, and call it a movie. It's very, very rare to see something aimed at kids that has actual depth and intelligence. The closest we've gotten this generation is Harry Potter, I think. (Although, the movies tried to dumb that down too. Sigh.)

/soapbox


militarysignatures.com

William Shakespeare wrote:
Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none.

 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website
Miguelius
Title: 83956789546
Joined: Apr 16 2009
Location: Chaco, Argentina
PostPosted: Jul 23 2009 03:07 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I love the original, I promise you, this remake will suck.
Sorryif someone had hopes......
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailAIM AddressMSN Messenger
Pandajuice
Title: The Power of Grayskull
Joined: Oct 30 2008
Location: US and UK
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 08:11 am Reply with quote Back to top

Anything that tries to remake a classic, near perfect film will ultimately fail. I agree with Miguelius that this will suck and is a horrible idea. I just watched Neverending Story last year and it still holds up, so remaking it is like remaking The Princess Bride; horrible idea.
View user's profileSend private message
Dii Infer
Title: Boobie Engineer
Joined: Jun 01 2007
Location: Texas
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 11:19 am Reply with quote Back to top

Milhouse wrote:
Why are they remaking all of this 1980s stuff?? They need to hurry-up and do a remake of "The Hangover" ...it's already been out for a over month.


SHUT UP, DAMMIT! Don't give them any ideas.


sig
 
View user's profileSend private message
ReeperTheSeeker
Joined: Aug 26 2007
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 03:11 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I wonder if we'll finally find out what name Bastian gave the Child-like Empress.

And I pray the movie is no where near as bad as NES3, that movie was terrible. I would see this for nostalgia but i'm not getting my hopes up. So far many remakes of 80s movies have been meh at best.


ImageImageImage
Links, pics, vids . . . I shall post these when given the chance
Transformers 2 Review: ". . . Did i mention SHIT BLOWS UP?!!!"
 
View user's profileSend private message
Deadmau_5pra
Title: Amatuer film/podcaster
Joined: Feb 10 2009
Location: Chicago Area
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 03:25 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Dii Infer wrote:
Milhouse wrote:
Why are they remaking all of this 1980s stuff?? They need to hurry-up and do a remake of "The Hangover" ...it's already been out for a over month.


SHUT UP, DAMMIT! Don't give them any ideas.


They greenlighted the sequel.


Image and video hosting by TinyPic
 
View user's profileSend private message
ReeperTheSeeker
Joined: Aug 26 2007
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 03:31 pm Reply with quote Back to top

SoldierHawk wrote:
IceWarm wrote:
They better do this movie correctly. I could see it being re-made with some cool CGI elements but it needs to at l;east look and feel like the original.


One of the sad things about modern kid's movies, I think, is that *none* of them really 'feel' like the classics we grew up watching (same goes for cartoons, actually.) People are so obsessed with making a buck that they'd rather throw out a bunch of flashy CGI, a few fart jokes, market with McDonalds, and call it a movie. It's very, very rare to see something aimed at kids that has actual depth and intelligence. The closest we've gotten this generation is Harry Potter, I think. (Although, the movies tried to dumb that down too. Sigh.)

/soapbox


This is exactly how i've been feeling for the past few years. Everything now a days is eye candy, CGI fests that rely too heavily on the audiences ADD as an excuse for lack of plot. Grant it, what we grew up it can be silly and down right stupid at times but they at least have a semblance of intellect, thought and care by the staff making the movie and cartoons. Today, Hawk hit it right on the money, no pun intended. A vast majority of thing geared towards kids today is just down right insulting to the generation it's aimed towards.

Aliens in the Attic? G-Force? Good gravy Rolling Eyes


ImageImageImage
Links, pics, vids . . . I shall post these when given the chance
Transformers 2 Review: ". . . Did i mention SHIT BLOWS UP?!!!"
 
View user's profileSend private message
Milhouse
Joined: Dec 19 2008
Location: Charlottesville, VA
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 03:42 pm Reply with quote Back to top

ReeperTheSeeker wrote:
I wonder if we'll finally find out what name Bastian gave the Child-like Empress.

And I pray the movie is no where near as bad as NES3, that movie was terrible. I would see this for nostalgia but i'm not getting my hopes up. So far many remakes of 80s movies have been meh at best.

If you turn on the subtitles on the dvd, he screams the name "Moon Child." I guess his mom was a dirty hippie. That's probably why she's dead...too much peyote.
View user's profileSend private message
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 04:32 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I am interested to see where this goes. The original was good because of the story, not because of any specific acting or effects. If they can improve upon the original without destroying it, then I am glad to see where this goes.



 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
BlackWings
Joined: Feb 01 2007
PostPosted: Jul 26 2009 08:42 am Reply with quote Back to top

GPFontaine wrote:
I am interested to see where this goes. The original was good because of the story, not because of any specific acting or effects. If they can improve upon the original without destroying it, then I am glad to see where this goes.


The plot in the movie is great, but the casting also gives something extra, and also indispensable, to the movie (I don't know what). One of the things that made the sequel suck was that they changed the actors, it's just like in "The Sandlot", without those specific kids, the movie would have sucked. So, I guess what I'm trying to say is that if someone wants to do a remake of this movie, they better find some charismatic kids instead of throwing in some Jonathan Lipnicki.


Go fuck a goat !!!
 
View user's profileSend private message
MamelDiaz
Title: Señor Cultura Pop
Joined: Jun 03 2009
Location: Colombia
PostPosted: Aug 06 2009 11:01 am Reply with quote Back to top

I have a feeling they're going to blow it. That movie can't be more awesome than it already is, even if they make Sean Connery voice the Lucky Dragon and make him say "but of course you are" when Atryu introduces himself.


"I have made many serious statements -- I just can't remember any of them. I guess they mustn't have been very important".

-Oliver Reed-
 
View user's profileSend private messageMSN Messenger
Douche McCallister
Moderator
Title: DOO-SHAY
Joined: Jan 26 2007
Location: Private Areas
PostPosted: Aug 06 2009 05:05 pm Reply with quote Back to top

The music and setting really make the movie for me. Both are going to change dramatically I'm sure. The scene with the two statues that shoot lazers is forever embedded in my mind and it will most definitely not be the same. QUIT FUCKING UP MY CHILDHOOD HOLLYWOOD!


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
Optimist With Doubts
Title: Titlating
Joined: Dec 17 2007
PostPosted: Aug 06 2009 05:21 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I am willing to accept this, the first film only covered half the novel so I would love a full adaptation.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM AddressYahoo Messenger
AJ Fox
Title: HylianFox
Joined: Jun 26 2009
Location: Calatia
PostPosted: Aug 13 2009 10:30 pm Reply with quote Back to top

ReeperTheSeeker wrote:
SoldierHawk wrote:
IceWarm wrote:
They better do this movie correctly. I could see it being re-made with some cool CGI elements but it needs to at l;east look and feel like the original.


One of the sad things about modern kid's movies, I think, is that *none* of them really 'feel' like the classics we grew up watching (same goes for cartoons, actually.) People are so obsessed with making a buck that they'd rather throw out a bunch of flashy CGI, a few fart jokes, market with McDonalds, and call it a movie. It's very, very rare to see something aimed at kids that has actual depth and intelligence. The closest we've gotten this generation is Harry Potter, I think. (Although, the movies tried to dumb that down too. Sigh.)

/soapbox


This is exactly how i've been feeling for the past few years. Everything now a days is eye candy, CGI fests that rely too heavily on the audiences ADD as an excuse for lack of plot. Grant it, what we grew up it can be silly and down right stupid at times but they at least have a semblance of intellect, thought and care by the staff making the movie and cartoons. Today, Hawk hit it right on the money, no pun intended. A vast majority of thing geared towards kids today is just down right insulting to the generation it's aimed towards.

Aliens in the Attic? G-Force? Good gravy Rolling Eyes


I could not possibly agree more with this.
View user's profileSend private message
Ice2SeeYou
Title: Sexual Tyrannosaurus
Joined: Sep 28 2008
Location: South of Heaven
PostPosted: Aug 17 2009 01:28 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I doubt it will be as scary as the original. Over-protective parents would have a hissy-fit if you drowned a horse in a children's movie today.


Sydlexia.com - Where miserable bastards meet to call each other retards.
 
View user's profileSend private message
ReeperTheSeeker
Joined: Aug 26 2007
PostPosted: Aug 17 2009 03:28 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Ice2SeeYou wrote:
I doubt it will be as scary as the original. Over-protective parents would have a hissy-fit if you drowned a horse in a children's movie today.


you make a good point. Anything that attempts scary in a kids movie today is so medicare even cowardly kids will find it ridiculous.


ImageImageImage
Links, pics, vids . . . I shall post these when given the chance
Transformers 2 Review: ". . . Did i mention SHIT BLOWS UP?!!!"
 
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: