SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
Street Fighter 4 vs. 3rd Strike


Reply to topic
Poll :: Which do you find superior in Gameplay?

Street fighter 3: 3rd Strike
30%
 30%  [ 4 ]
Street Fighter 4
30%
 30%  [ 4 ]
Fuck both of them it's all about MvC2
38%
 38%  [ 5 ]
Total Votes : 13


Author Message
Burt Reynolds
Title: Bentley Bear
Joined: Apr 07 2008
Location: California
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 12:56 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I have recently purchased the PC release of SF4 and I had been playing the ps3 version at a friends house before then (btw pc version blows away ps3/360 with higher available resolutions and style options not available on console).

Anyway, I have been at it for quite a while now, and I have to say that in my opinion it steals the crown once held by 3rd strike for greatest fighting game every created.

I think it is the most balanced fighting game to date, no longer are the niche characters such as zangief and dhalsim clearly at a disadvantage nor are there the akumas and yungs with strong advantages. I think any character is an equal match up, and while i do miss the parry option I think the focus attacks make up for it. I think there is so much diversity within the playing styles of all the characters, even the shoto characters all play very differently . Cutting it short, the game is also beautiful, especially the pc version with the ink effect turned on.

as a side note: I never thought I would move away from shoto's as primary characters for online battle, but chun-li's moveset is insanely diverse and after hours of blistered thumbs her specials are pretty easy to pull off, as that what was originally turned me off from her.

tl;dr Sf4 in my opinion is the greatest fighting game to date. What are you aficionado's opinion on 4's game play versus 3rd strikes?


Dances with Wolves 2 is gonna ROCK!
 
View user's profileSend private messageMSN Messenger
Andrew Man
Title: Is a Funklord
Joined: Jan 30 2007
Location: Annandale, VA
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 01:03 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I think SFIV is balanced very well, however from a hardcore fighting fan's view, I would saw third strike is superior in terms of gameplay, Hell, I was playing it on my Dreamcast just last night.

It's just faster paced, less user (n00b) friendly, and has more depth and that is how I like my fighters. Fuck what anyone says, I love the parry system and being able to choose between three different supers at the character select screen. The one thing I am not so how on is the roster in SF3, alot the characters are simply lame IMO and don't fit into the SF universe.

Ideally I would love the SFIV roster playing on the Third Strike engine.

EDIT: Also, I love the vs. fighters (especially MvC2) although its impossible to argue that it is more balanced or even as balanced as the first. I just love the three person tag system and frantic gameplay. I use it to relax after playing SF, as SF is much more tedious and intense (especially with two skilled players). MvC is refreshing and I feel like there is less pressure when playing it. Also the team combinations are epic


My Muzaks! CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.facebook.com/hellodharmaband

3DS is very good, and Wii U!

 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Burt Reynolds
Title: Bentley Bear
Joined: Apr 07 2008
Location: California
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 01:11 pm Reply with quote Back to top

good points. Sf4 is definitely a bit slower paced, though I think it's still pretty deep, while still having that basic sf2 sensibility where if your a nub, you can still play it and enjoy yourself. I would argue though that on online play the casual player will find that using old sf2 strategies exclusively for the most part gets you demolished.

Also, Seth is a cheater. While gill was annoying as hell, and definitely a challenge, it didn't feel like i was being cheated the same as when you fight seth.


Dances with Wolves 2 is gonna ROCK!
 
View user's profileSend private messageMSN Messenger
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 01:14 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I'm all about the Vs. games, moreso the two man tag format than MvC2.

Never really got into SF3 and haven't played SF4 yet. but I'll get it eventually, I LOATHE the artistic direction of the game so it was never a must-buy for me. Also, a lot of people I've talked to say the game is not balanced at all. Specifically Seth and Sagat are often mentioned as being overpowered, and a good player can completely shut you down and rape you with them.

How come only SF3 3rd Strike is an option? Why not SF3: The New Generation or SF3 Second Impact?

Also, I fucking hate the Alpha series.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Andrew Man
Title: Is a Funklord
Joined: Jan 30 2007
Location: Annandale, VA
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 01:17 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
How come only SF3 3rd Strike is an option? Why not SF3: The New Generation or SF3 Second Impact?

Also, I fucking hate the Alpha series.

Because Third Strike is superior to the previous two iterations. More characters, etc. Duh.

Also, yea the Alpha series is wack.

Burt Reynolds wrote:
Also, Seth is a cheater. While gill was annoying as hell, and definitely a challenge, it didn't feel like i was being cheated the same as when you fight seth.

I would actually say, out loud, "He is FUCKING cheating" some times while fighting him, the way he gets you with that one super where he blasts you at the screen is so bullshitty, he can essentially suck you up and grab you from anywhere. I hate when people use him as well.

I have always been a big Bison enthusiast, but my favorite new character is Viper, she is fucking nasty.


My Muzaks! CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.facebook.com/hellodharmaband

3DS is very good, and Wii U!

 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Burt Reynolds
Title: Bentley Bear
Joined: Apr 07 2008
Location: California
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 01:24 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
I'm all about the Vs. games.

Never really got into SF3 and haven't played SF4 yet. but I'll get it eventually, I LOATHE the artistic direction of the game so it was never a must-buy for me. Also, a lot of people I've talked to say the game is not balanced at all. Specifically Seth and Sagat are often mentioned as being overpowered, and a good player can completely shut you down and rape you with them.

How come only SF3 3rd Strike is an option? Why not SF3: The New Generation or SF3 Second Impact?

Also, I fucking hate the Alpha series.

Seth is a bastard as the computer. But I have never been utterly destroyed by Seth in vs battle. He has a ridiculous move set but they are so utterly weak and he's such a giant target, that I've never had many problems with him. Of course, I may have never just run into "that guy" who figured out how to dominate with him. With sagat, I think he as a very easy character to learn and it makes him good to fight with from the getgo, but honestly, the sonsofbitches that are good with Abel completely rock me worse than any sagat player ever has.


Dances with Wolves 2 is gonna ROCK!
 
View user's profileSend private messageMSN Messenger
Andrew Man
Title: Is a Funklord
Joined: Jan 30 2007
Location: Annandale, VA
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 01:27 pm Reply with quote Back to top

A good Abel can put someone under the ground very fast, I have experienced this first hand too many times.


My Muzaks! CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.facebook.com/hellodharmaband

3DS is very good, and Wii U!

 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Mr. Bomberman
2009 Forum Champion
Title: (still) token black.
Joined: Jan 27 2006
Location: Home of the lost towers
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 06:02 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I still haven't played SF4 yet...

I'll just choose SF3 even though I love that and the Vs. series the same way. I play a mean Yun and Ken.


Image
Xbox Live: HazNobody, pronounced "HAz". | Haven't went to IRC yet? Go! #sydlexia @ DALnet. | Y'all should play some Super Robot Wars J (hey that rhymes!) | yeah I'm back who gives a shit
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
TheRoboSleuth
Title: Sleuth Mark IV
Joined: Aug 08 2006
Location: The Gritty Future
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 08:43 pm Reply with quote Back to top

SF4. Everything is floaty, and the new characters are the stupidest things ever (with the exception of Abel). It just doesn't feel right, after playing it a while.

Third Strike is gaming gold. Impacts are precise and solid, the supers are sufficiently impressive to satisfy spectacle hunger, and the characters are distinctive in moveset and personality. Its a deep deep game that deserves the respect it gets.

Plus, Q inspired my avatar.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
lavalarva
2011 SNES Champ
Joined: Dec 04 2006
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 09:22 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Burt Reynolds wrote:
I think it is the most balanced fighting game to date


Are there more than 75% of the characters usable in tournaments? Most 3rd strike tournaments I've seen on youtube are chun-li/ken/yung crapfests,
so that would be a nice change (I've never tried any of them, but would certainly suck at them anyway).

Anyway, I know a game where every single fucking character has a chance to win in a tournament, even that one with bad matchups against everybody (like a less crappy Dan).
There are only like 10 characters though, compared to the...25?... in SF4.
View user's profileSend private message
Ba'al
Title: Zerg Zergling
Joined: Mar 02 2008
Location: Uranus
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 09:47 pm Reply with quote Back to top

SFIII is the most overrated fighting game pile on the face of the earth, most of the new characters suck, it's broken as hell, and the music is not of my taste. Hell, they even called Andore "Hugo", for some reason that escapes me.

Therefore, SFIV, it was the best fighting game I played since SSBB, until BlazBlue trumped it later.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Jul 24 2009 10:19 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I like Street Fighter EX. Skullomania's runnin' wild, brutha!
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
TheRoboSleuth
Title: Sleuth Mark IV
Joined: Aug 08 2006
Location: The Gritty Future
PostPosted: Jul 25 2009 03:05 am Reply with quote Back to top

Ba'al wrote:
SFIII is the most overrated fighting game pile on the face of the earth, most of the new characters suck, it's broken as hell, and the music is not of my taste. Hell, they even called Andore "Hugo", for some reason that escapes me.

Therefore, SFIV, it was the best fighting game I played since SSBB, until BlazBlue trumped it later.

Endorsing SSBB, which has shitty new characters, an utter absence of balance, and mediocre music, undermines the vast majority of your argument by way of inconsistent logic.

Hugo's name is Hugo Andore. Thats why its called the Andore family, they're known by their last name.

I'm going to take a moment and endorse Blaz Blue, one of the best designed fighters ever made. I'm not going to give evidence, go out and play that bitch now.

Also...


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Jul 25 2009 06:54 am Reply with quote Back to top

SSBB does not have shitty new characters or shitty music. But the fighting engine is awful. It should have been the Melee fighting engine with Wavedashing and L-Cancel removed. Instead, they nerfed air combat, added in tripping, and gave us Final Smashes, the most overhyped game feature ever. Thank God there's an option to turn the Final Smashes off... it makes the game so much more fun. And yeah, the characters are completely unbalanced. The characters have always been unbalanced in Smash Brothers though. Which is why if someone tells you that they only play Final Destination, no items, 1 on 1, stock match, you can be sure they're a complete asshole. If it's Melee, they'll pick inevitably pick Marth and proceed to play like a complete fucking douchebag.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Greg the White
Joined: Apr 09 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Jul 25 2009 07:06 am Reply with quote Back to top

I like SF4, except for the fact that Zangief is easier to use. I always felt special because I was good with that giant Russian freak all those years, then everyone discovers him.


So here's to you Mrs. Robinson. People love you more- oh, nevermind.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Knyte
2010 SLF Tag Champ*
Title: Curator Of The VGM
Joined: Nov 01 2006
Location: Here I am.
PostPosted: Jul 25 2009 03:04 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I want mindless fun, I'll play SFIII or SFIV.

I want deep, I'll play Guilty Gear X.
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Andrew Man
Title: Is a Funklord
Joined: Jan 30 2007
Location: Annandale, VA
PostPosted: Jul 26 2009 02:02 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
SSBB does not have shitty new characters or shitty music. But the fighting engine is awful. It should have been the Melee fighting engine with Wavedashing and L-Cancel removed. Instead, they nerfed air combat, added in tripping, and gave us Final Smashes, the most overhyped game feature ever. Thank God there's an option to turn the Final Smashes off... it makes the game so much more fun. And yeah, the characters are completely unbalanced. The characters have always been unbalanced in Smash Brothers though. Which is why if someone tells you that they only play Final Destination, no items, 1 on 1, stock match, you can be sure they're a complete asshole. If it's Melee, they'll pick inevitably pick Marth and proceed to play like a complete fucking douchebag.


Me and my circle of friends have played SSBM (by far) more than any other game ever created, literally like 4-5 years sunk into that game. I do agree the game is very unbalanced character wise, Fox, Falco, Shiek, Marth and to an extent Cap. Falcon are unbelievably broken. That scenario you described (1v1, no items, final destination levels) is what you come to after playing the game into the ground. Its solely done to increase the balance in the game, everyone knows that the items are broken as a motherfucker (not to mention annoying).

The first couple years we played Melee we were very traditional with our setup, items, any level, all that good stuff; I despised it when certain friends would want to turn off the items. However, after time you begin to realize that "god damnit, I am better than this person, I should have won, yet a wondering Bob-Omb came into the screen out of nowhere and blew me to hell". fucking bullshit. I eventually came to start turning off items, and not playing levels that gave unfair advantages, or are simply just poor example of level design for a fighting game. I just want to fight on a nice, flat, balanced surface where all you focus on is the fighting, levels like Pokefloats and shit like that force you to think about platforming, making the fighting aspect of the game play second fiddle. I am not a fan of this, so yea, I mostly play levels like FD and Battlefield, Yoshi's Island, Fountain of Dreams, etc. Look at other fighters like SF, different levels aren't really different levels, they are all just like FD (and Calista Flockheart) FLAT, with no obstacles, the only difference is the background, which as gorgeous as they might be, are generic and interchangeable.

Anyways, I love Melee and Brawl made me very sad, which is a shame because I really like the cast in that game. I always wish I could play with characters like Pkmn Trainer and Sonic on the Melee engine.

RobotGumshoe wrote:
SF4. Everything is floaty, and the new characters are the stupidest things ever (with the exception of Abel). It just doesn't feel right, after playing it a while.

Third Strike is gaming gold. Impacts are precise and solid, the supers are sufficiently impressive to satisfy spectacle hunger, and the characters are distinctive in moveset and personality. Its a deep deep game that deserves the respect it gets.

Plus, Q inspired my avatar.


I agree with everything you said, also I thought about/noticed that everytime I chose Q as my fighter. But yea, SFIII is soooo deep, the parry system is fantastic, it seems impossible at first, but you get start to get this premonition where you just feel the attacks coming and you eventually get the hang of it. Its the shit like that in which makes it unbelievable.

Knyte wrote:
I want mindless fun, I'll play SFIII or SFIV.


SFIII is too serious and intense IMO to be mindless, the controls are also not so n00b friendly, SFIV on the other hand...

On a side note, I cannot wait for Capcom v. Tatsunoko, I STILL can't believe that game is making the trip overseas (and so soon!). The online should be incredible, its the same team that put together the SFII HD Remix online component. It looks like the ultimate Vs. fighter, Viewtiful Joe FTW.


My Muzaks! CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.facebook.com/hellodharmaband

3DS is very good, and Wii U!

 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
IceWarm
Joined: Dec 22 2008
Location: Breckenridge, Colorado
PostPosted: Jul 26 2009 07:36 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I think they are on even ground for the most part. I think SF3-Third Strike needs a little more skill with the parry system but other than that they are equally good in my opinion.


"Anybody who ever built an empire, or changed the world, sat where you are now. And it’s because they sat there that they were able to do it."

"Fighting in a basement offers a lot of difficulties, number one being, you're fighting in a basement."

"You're Not So Tough Without Your Veggie!"
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Cru33
Joined: Jul 28 2009
PostPosted: Jul 28 2009 11:03 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Seth is only a cheater when the computer uses him, in MP seth only has 700 HP and dies so fast it's rediculous.

SF4 is by far the best and MOST balanced SF ever. Even dan is a viable option.
View user's profileSend private message
Andrew Man
Title: Is a Funklord
Joined: Jan 30 2007
Location: Annandale, VA
PostPosted: Jul 29 2009 07:56 am Reply with quote Back to top

Cru33 wrote:
Seth is only a cheater when the computer uses him, in MP seth only has 700 HP and dies so fast it's rediculous.

SF4 is by far the best and MOST balanced SF ever. Even dan is a viable option.


I would say they did a great job in balancing it, although I feel SFII: HD remix is a very close second in terms of balance.

I just don't think that it is as deep as SFIII and the depth of a fighter is what truly matters.


My Muzaks! CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.facebook.com/hellodharmaband

3DS is very good, and Wii U!

 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Cru33
Joined: Jul 28 2009
PostPosted: Jul 29 2009 03:22 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Andrew Man wrote:
Cru33 wrote:
Seth is only a cheater when the computer uses him, in MP seth only has 700 HP and dies so fast it's rediculous.

SF4 is by far the best and MOST balanced SF ever. Even dan is a viable option.


I would say they did a great job in balancing it, although I feel SFII: HD remix is a very close second in terms of balance.

I just don't think that it is as deep as SFIII and the depth of a fighter is what truly matters.


I personally feel that with the Supers, Ultra's, and various ways to use Focus attacks Defensively AND Offensively, that SF4 has more depth than most people give it credit for. Also The focus cancel adds SO much to combos if you can pull it off.

I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I really think there is more variation and depth to SF4 than most people give it credit for.
View user's profileSend private message
Andrew Man
Title: Is a Funklord
Joined: Jan 30 2007
Location: Annandale, VA
PostPosted: Jul 29 2009 04:04 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Cru33 wrote:
Andrew Man wrote:
Cru33 wrote:
Seth is only a cheater when the computer uses him, in MP seth only has 700 HP and dies so fast it's rediculous.

SF4 is by far the best and MOST balanced SF ever. Even dan is a viable option.


I would say they did a great job in balancing it, although I feel SFII: HD remix is a very close second in terms of balance.

I just don't think that it is as deep as SFIII and the depth of a fighter is what truly matters.


I personally feel that with the Supers, Ultra's, and various ways to use Focus attacks Defensively AND Offensively, that SF4 has more depth than most people give it credit for. Also The focus cancel adds SO much to combos if you can pull it off.

I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I really think there is more variation and depth to SF4 than most people give it credit for.


First of all, I am not saying there is no depth in IV. I love to use focus cancels to absorb attacks and such, I am just saying there is not as much skill involved.

To focus, you simply need to press to buttons at the same time, to parry, granted its only pushing the stick forward, but you have to time it perfectly. its just so fucking epic once you get the hang of it. Even though I like the cast in IV more, III definitely has the superior fighting engine.

I know this vid has made many appearances before, but it's the SFIII: 3rd Strike final round from EVO 2004. This is one the most epic fighting vids I have ever seen, pay close attention to the last match how Ken comes back and is able to parry every hit of Chun-Li's super, the crowd fucking loses it and I almost explode.

Pay close attention to the 2:45 mark.


My Muzaks! CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.facebook.com/hellodharmaband

3DS is very good, and Wii U!

 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Cru33
Joined: Jul 28 2009
PostPosted: Jul 29 2009 04:12 pm Reply with quote Back to top

ya that vid is great. I love watching good SF battles. The fact that SF has so many great games in the series says a lot about SF as a whole. I think that the two are VERY close, I just personally prefer the pacing and strategy of IV.

Is that the same fight of the video where the loser gets so pissed off and runs out of the room angry? I'm sure you know which video I'm talking about.

[Edit: I looked it up and yes, it is]
View user's profileSend private message
Andrew Man
Title: Is a Funklord
Joined: Jan 30 2007
Location: Annandale, VA
PostPosted: Jul 29 2009 04:30 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Cru33 wrote:
Is that the same fight of the video where the loser gets so pissed off and runs out of the room angry? I'm sure you know which video I'm talking about.

[Edit: I looked it up and yes, it is]


After that comeback and beatdown, I know I would.


My Muzaks! CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.facebook.com/hellodharmaband

3DS is very good, and Wii U!

 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Cru33
Joined: Jul 28 2009
PostPosted: Jul 29 2009 04:41 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I wish I knew how to post vid's of saved replays from my xbox. I have one from SF4 that is the comeback of the century. Not as flashy as that, but I really can't describe how close to dead I was. I'd guess 1-2% health with one rd. loss already... I dunno, but I'm going to go watch it again and make myself smile.
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: