Flies don't count as animals. They are plague-carrying vermin. If that fly didn't wanna die, it should have stayed the fuck outside.

What could Bush have done in those extra seven minutes that wasn't done without him? For Christ's sake, the World Trade Center was already blown up. What the fuck was he going to do, activate the Sands of Time, go back 15 minutes and stop it from happening? Cuz that only works in Prince of Persia. I think it's funny that the people who criticize Bush for moving too quickly in his War on Terror are the same people who criticize him for not using those 7 minutes. You know, so he could have attacked the hell out of Afghanistan seven minutes sooner.

The War On Terror Should Have Moved Ahead Slowly and Carefully.... Except During Those Seven Minutes!

You can't fucking have it both ways. You bleeding heart liberals don't seem to understand that. You whine that people are starving to death on the streets, then you whine when Congress raises taxes to pay for its new Homeless People Shouldn't Starve To Death bill. Make up your fucking mind.

JRA wrote:

Here's what I don't understand, people hate Democrats for spending too much, yet what did Bush do? Spend our surplus budget and put us trillions of dollars in debt.

Bush definitely spent way too much, which is why Ron Paul has become such a hit with young conservatives. Paul is pretty much the only guy in Washington preaching fiscal responsibility right now.

Honestly, in terms of fiscal responsibility, 1994-2000 was a golden age. Both President Clinton and the Republican Congress curbed spended an provided us with a budget surplus. Sure, a large part of that fiscal responsibility resulted from deadlock and Congress's crushing defeat of Clinton's grandiose national health care scheme, but it was fiscal responsibility nonetheless.

There is no question that Bush's spending was out of control. There are those who will say that you can't put a price on freedom and national security. I will not argue that you can't put a price on national security. However, I don't believe my dime should pay for a foreign country's freedom any more than I believe my dime should pay for some homeless guy's insulin. Did Bush's spending fuck us over to a significant extent? Absolutely. But unfortunately, President Barack refuses to give us the luxury to worry about how Bush's spending fucked us over, because everyday he wakes up and decides to make the problem massively fucking worse. Let's ask ourselves this: what is our current commander-in-chief doing to reign in spending and curb our national debt? The answer is absolutely nothing. President Barack was often depicted as running on a peace platform, but like Nixon before him, it is unlikely we will see peace within his first term. A lot of people don't realize this, but the president pledged to refocus our attention on Afghanistan, which means will be sending more troops there. He also promised to end military operations in Iraq, but that won't happen any time soon. At the end of the day, the president knows McCain was right; we absolutely do need to leave, but we need to so in a responsible fashion. So all that military spending we saw under Bush? You can forget about seeing that cut from the president's budget. On top of that we have bailouts, a costly job creation initiative, stimulus packages, and the threat of socialized health care. We couldn't afford to run two wars at once, and now we're piling more shit on top of that? GREAT IDEA! You know where the government is going to get money for that? It's pretty simple. The government is going to ram its dick up your ass over and over again until you vomit $100 bills.

Optimist With Doubts wrote:

you know what else sucks about flys? That movie the fly 2.

Nowhere near as good as the first movie, but watchable.

Social networking can win a revolution. Believe it, because it's true.