SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
Discussing Evolution without Touching Religion


Reply to topic
Author Message
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
PostPosted: May 15 2009 09:47 am Reply with quote Back to top

I found this video to be quite interesting. It explains in words what I think most people believe but have never been able to express this well.





 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: May 15 2009 10:00 am Reply with quote Back to top

Very nice.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Captain_Pollution
Title: Hugh
Joined: Sep 23 2007
PostPosted: May 15 2009 10:32 am Reply with quote Back to top

How long before someone complains about God being put on the same level as aliens, any bets?


<Drew_Linky> Well, I've eaten vegetables all of once in my life.

 
View user's profileSend private message
Cattivo
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Location: Lake Michigan
PostPosted: May 15 2009 11:23 am Reply with quote Back to top

Captain_Pollution wrote:
How long before someone complains about God being put on the same level as aliens, any bets?

I'm just glad I can't watch youtube at work...
View user's profileSend private message
JoshWoodzy
Joined: May 22 2008
Location: Goshen, VA
PostPosted: May 15 2009 11:38 am Reply with quote Back to top

I guess it is impossible to have christian values and believe accepted science at the same time.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Cattivo
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Location: Lake Michigan
PostPosted: May 15 2009 11:44 am Reply with quote Back to top

Many here believe in both, including myself.
View user's profileSend private message
Captain_Pollution
Title: Hugh
Joined: Sep 23 2007
PostPosted: May 15 2009 11:51 am Reply with quote Back to top

joshwoodzell wrote:
I guess it is impossible to have christian values and believe accepted science at the same time.

Did you watch the video, Zell?


<Drew_Linky> Well, I've eaten vegetables all of once in my life.

 
View user's profileSend private message
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: May 15 2009 11:52 am Reply with quote Back to top

Watch the video when you get a chance. It's very well done.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
JoshWoodzy
Joined: May 22 2008
Location: Goshen, VA
PostPosted: May 15 2009 11:56 am Reply with quote Back to top

I did watch the video and liked it a lot. I was being sarcastic as so many people are ignorant of evolution AND christian values and it makes me sad. It's like "If you don't belong to one team, you can't belong to both!!!!!!" Fanatics ruin things.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: May 15 2009 12:01 pm Reply with quote Back to top

My comment was more directed at Cattivo. I had the misfortune of being in the process of typing it while CP was submitting his.

But anyway, one of my favorite quotes on the subject of religion and science comes from Kurt Vonnegut:

"A great swindle of our time is the assumption that science has made religion obsolete. All science has damaged is the story of Adam and Eve and the story of Jonah and the Whale. Everything else holds up pretty well, particularly lessons about fairness and gentleness. People who find those lessons irrelevant in the twentieth century are simply using science as an excuse for greed and harshness. Science has nothing to do with it, friends."
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Cattivo
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Location: Lake Michigan
PostPosted: May 15 2009 12:03 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I love Vonnegut.
View user's profileSend private message
JoshWoodzy
Joined: May 22 2008
Location: Goshen, VA
PostPosted: May 15 2009 12:08 pm Reply with quote Back to top

That is an extremely good quote and sums up my feelings almost exactly.

What makes me perturbed is that so many fanatics think that different factions of thought cannot co-exist. They either force opinions or make judgement while being completely ignorant of the thing they are talking down about. Atheists try to force lame opinions on people who are competent enough to form their own, Christians look down upon anyone who hasn't read the bible front to back, Science freaks sit high upon their super smart pedestal. Why can't people just be happy knowing what they know for themselves and leave other people alone? It's depressing.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: May 15 2009 12:20 pm Reply with quote Back to top

If Terry Gilliam has taught me anything, it's that there's a blurry line between fantasy and reality. Neither one is useful by itself, and neither one is infallible. If assigning incredibly specific traits to an unseen Creator of whom we know very little makes you happy, go for it. If denying the existence of a Creator makes you happy, go for it. But do not be so arrogant as to impose your own path of happiness on others; this only creates misery.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
JoshWoodzy
Joined: May 22 2008
Location: Goshen, VA
PostPosted: May 15 2009 12:26 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I love it. Perfect paragraph if I have ever seen one, Syd. I also see this thread exceeding 4 to 5 pages, so lets go with the flow.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Rycona
Moderator
Title: The Maestro
Joined: Nov 01 2005
Location: Away from Emerald Weapon
PostPosted: May 15 2009 12:32 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I loved that video. The message was very clear and well-illustrated. This makes me wants to play Spore again.


RIP Hacker.
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
Ice2SeeYou
Title: Sexual Tyrannosaurus
Joined: Sep 28 2008
Location: South of Heaven
PostPosted: May 15 2009 12:44 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
My comment was more directed at Cattivo. I had the misfortune of being in the process of typing it while CP was submitting his.

But anyway, one of my favorite quotes on the subject of religion and science comes from Kurt Vonnegut:

"A great swindle of our time is the assumption that science has made religion obsolete. All science has damaged is the story of Adam and Eve and the story of Jonah and the Whale. Everything else holds up pretty well, particularly lessons about fairness and gentleness. People who find those lessons irrelevant in the twentieth century are simply using science as an excuse for greed and harshness. Science has nothing to do with it, friends."

"Fuck you, Vonnegut!" - Rodney Dangerfield


Sydlexia.com - Where miserable bastards meet to call each other retards.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Little Mac
Joined: Mar 25 2009
PostPosted: May 15 2009 01:59 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
My comment was more directed at Cattivo. I had the misfortune of being in the process of typing it while CP was submitting his.

But anyway, one of my favorite quotes on the subject of religion and science comes from Kurt Vonnegut:

"A great swindle of our time is the assumption that science has made religion obsolete. All science has damaged is the story of Adam and Eve and the story of Jonah and the Whale. Everything else holds up pretty well, particularly lessons about fairness and gentleness. People who find those lessons irrelevant in the twentieth century are simply using science as an excuse for greed and harshness. Science has nothing to do with it, friends."

While I agree with your other post, Syd, I have a problem with Vonnegut's underlying message: that morality is inherently religious and anyone who turns their back on religion is turning their back on morality. Just because I find religion irrelevant doesn't mean I'm greedy or harsh. I don't need the threat of fire and brimstone in order to not kill anyone and it's not just because I'd be thrown in jail by rule of law.

However, having said that, I say let everyone think what they want to think as long as it's not harming someone else. Though I am a big proponent of exposing children to different opinions; the people who homeschool their kids because public schools teach evolution and are afraid that the Christian values they're hammering into their kids are simply bad parents. Children should be allowed to hear and learn about different viewpoints; let parents teach religion and schools teach science. Then let the kid decide when he's old enough.


Fear the pink sweatsuit.
 
View user's profileSend private message
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
PostPosted: May 15 2009 02:40 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I always thought the religious issue wasn't evolution per se, but was human evolution. Adam and Even and 7 days and the like...plus it's kind of a slap in the face to our "specialness" if we're not God's hand-picked creations.

I never saw a conflict myself. Time is an invention of mankind, "7 days" could be anything to God, and who's to say that when He made Adam, He didn't just pick an ape he liked and tinker with the genes?

Oh yeah, I want a Crocoduck.
View user's profileSend private message
Ice2SeeYou
Title: Sexual Tyrannosaurus
Joined: Sep 28 2008
Location: South of Heaven
PostPosted: May 15 2009 02:43 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Little Mac wrote:
Syd Lexia wrote:
My comment was more directed at Cattivo. I had the misfortune of being in the process of typing it while CP was submitting his.

But anyway, one of my favorite quotes on the subject of religion and science comes from Kurt Vonnegut:

"A great swindle of our time is the assumption that science has made religion obsolete. All science has damaged is the story of Adam and Eve and the story of Jonah and the Whale. Everything else holds up pretty well, particularly lessons about fairness and gentleness. People who find those lessons irrelevant in the twentieth century are simply using science as an excuse for greed and harshness. Science has nothing to do with it, friends."

While I agree with your other post, Syd, I have a problem with Vonnegut's underlying message: that morality is inherently religious and anyone who turns their back on religion is turning their back on morality. Just because I find religion irrelevant doesn't mean I'm greedy or harsh. I don't need the threat of fire and brimstone in order to not kill anyone and it's not just because I'd be thrown in jail by rule of law.

However, having said that, I say let everyone think what they want to think as long as it's not harming someone else. Though I am a big proponent of exposing children to different opinions; the people who homeschool their kids because public schools teach evolution and are afraid that the Christian values they're hammering into their kids are simply bad parents. Children should be allowed to hear and learn about different viewpoints; let parents teach religion and schools teach science. Then let the kid decide when he's old enough.

I agree completely. I don't believe that religion should stand as the (only) standard of measurement for morality, particularly since I (and many other people) don't agree with everything that religions preach.

If a kid asks why it's wrong to steal, you could say "Jesus doesn't like stealing." But I'd rather just say "don't be a dick."


Sydlexia.com - Where miserable bastards meet to call each other retards.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: May 15 2009 03:01 pm Reply with quote Back to top

There are a few important things to understand about Vonnegut:

1. He was not particularly religious
2. He was not anti-science
3. He witnessed the firebombing of Dresden firsthand, which greatly effected the rest of his life
4. Most of his life was lived in the shadow of warring political ideologies; first Nazism vs. democracy, then communism vs. democracy

In Vonnegut's understanding of the world, science has the power to improve our lives, but far too often it is used as the tools of fervent nationalists who hope to use it subjugate nations they perceive to be inferior underneath them. And in Vonnegut's worldview, nationalism is the ultimate evil in the world, and yes, he does see a certain godlessness in it. Subsequently, Vonnegut saw religion as a weapon against nationalism. He believed that since mankind refused to recognize and unite under the basic similarities of the human condition, then they could only be united if they allowed themselves to believe that they were the works of benevolent Creator who did not wish them to inflict suffering upon each other. Vonnegut's advocacy of God was somewhat pragmatic; he didn't necessarily believe there was a God, but he believed the world would be better a place if people believed in something more powerful and more just than their government or their own individual needs. The quote I used, while one of my favorites, is perhaps not the best representation of his views. His belief was that not science was inherently evil, but that unchecked science in the hands of military powers was just as dangerous as unchecked religion, if not moreso. Here are more quotes that might better illustrate his views on science and religion:

"I know that millions of dollars have been spent to produce this splendid graduating class, and that the main hope of your teachers was, once they got through with you, that you would no longer be superstitious. I'm sorry — I have to undo that now. I beg you to believe in the most ridiculous superstition of all: that humanity is at the center of the universe, the fulfiller or the frustrator of the grandest dreams of God Almighty. If you can believe that, and make others believe it, then there might be hope for us. Human beings might stop treating each other like garbage, might begin to treasure and protect each other instead. Then it might be all right to have babies again."

"The arts put man at the center of the universe, whether he belongs there or not. Military science, on the other hand, treats man as garbage — and his children, and his cities, too. Military science is probably right about the contemptibility of man in the vastness of the universe. Still — I deny that contemptibility, and I beg you to deny it, through the creation of appreciation of art."

"I thought scientists were going to find out exactly how everything worked, and then make it work better. I fully expected that by the time I was twenty-one, some scientist, maybe my brother, would have taken a color photograph of God Almighty — and sold it to Popular Mechanics magazine. Scientific truth was going to make us so happy and comfortable. What actually happened when I was twenty-one was that we dropped scientific truth on Hiroshima."

"If I should ever die, God forbid, let this be my epitaph:
THE ONLY PROOF HE NEEDED
FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
WAS MUSIC "

"Take Care of the People, and God Almighty Will Take Care of Himself."

"There are plenty of good reasons for fighting," I said, "but no good reason ever to hate without reservation, to imagine that God Almighty Himself hates with you, too. Where's evil? It's that large part of every man that wants to hate without limit, that wants to hate with God on its side."

"I will come to a time in my backwards trip when November eleventh, accidentally my birthday, was a sacred day called Armistice Day. When I was a boy, and when Dwayne Hoover was a boy, all the people of all the nations which had fought in the First World War were silent during the eleventh minute of the eleventh hour of Armistice Day, which was the eleventh day of the eleventh month. It was during that minute in nineteen hundred and eighteen, that millions upon millions of human beings stopped butchering one another. I have talked to old men who were on battlefields during that minute. They have told me in one way or another that the sudden silence was the Voice of God. So we still have among us some men who can remember when God spoke clearly to mankind."

"That was the strength of the Nazis," she said. "They understood God better than anyone. They knew how to make him stay away."

"Some of you may know that I am neither Christian nor Jewish nor Buddist, nor a conventionally religious person of any sort. I am a humanist, which means, in part, that I have tried to behave decently without any expectation of rewards or punishments after I'm dead. My German-American ancestors, the earliest of whom settled in our Middle West about the time of our Civil War, called themselves 'Freethinkers,' which is the same sort of thing. My great grandfather Clemens Vonnegut wrote, for example, 'If what Jesus said was good, what can it matter whether he was God or not?' I myself have written: If it weren't for the message of mercy and pity in Jesus' Sermon on the Mount, I wouldn't want to be a human being. I would just as soon be a rattlesnake."
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
PostPosted: May 15 2009 03:06 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Religion is the basis of morality.

That does not mean the nonreligious are amoral. It means they drew their morals from the religions around them.
View user's profileSend private message
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: May 15 2009 03:18 pm Reply with quote Back to top

UsaSatsui wrote:
I never saw a conflict myself. Time is an invention of mankind, "7 days" could be anything to God

Reminds me of a joke I heard once. A man is sitiing in his kitchen one night and suddenly Jesus Christ appears before him.

"My child," He says, "I will allow you to ask me three questions. Think carefully."

"Lord Jesus Christ, is money important?"

"No, my child. A million dollars is but a mere penny to me."

"Lord Jesus Christ, is Heaven really eternal?"

"Yes, my child. A million years is like a mere second to me."

"Lord Jesus Christ, may I have a penny?"

"In a second."
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Little Mac
Joined: Mar 25 2009
PostPosted: May 15 2009 03:54 pm Reply with quote Back to top

UsaSatsui wrote:
Religion is the basis of morality.

That does not mean the nonreligious are amoral. It means they drew their morals from the religions around them.

We will have to agree to disagree on this point. I believe that before religion there was morality. And I believe that those who are religious aren't moral by default - I would cite the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition as examples.


Fear the pink sweatsuit.
 
View user's profileSend private message
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
PostPosted: May 15 2009 04:14 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Little Mac wrote:
UsaSatsui wrote:
Religion is the basis of morality.

That does not mean the nonreligious are amoral. It means they drew their morals from the religions around them.

We will have to agree to disagree on this point. I believe that before religion there was morality. And I believe that those who are religious aren't moral by default - I would cite the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition as examples.

Just because you believe it doesn't make it true. And it's really hard to prove, since both are ancient concepts. But morals run contrary to animal behavior, and people at base are animals.

But you're missing my point. Religious people are not necessarily moral, and moral people are not necessarily religious. Religion does, however, teach moral values and is a handy tool for preserving them to teach to future generations, as well as give an incentive for following them. You don't have to be a Christian to believe that stealing and killing are wrong, but those ideas are ingrained in our society through Christian beliefs, so that's what our society believes to be moral. Note that in areas with different religions, they have different standards, because they have different ideas of morality.
View user's profileSend private message
Cattivo
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Location: Lake Michigan
PostPosted: May 15 2009 04:41 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Nice clarification of Vonnegut, Syd. I really have to go back to my Vonnegut novels after I finish up my Dostoevsky material, now that I'm done with my grad school responsibilities.

UsaSatsui wrote:
I never saw a conflict myself. Time is an invention of mankind, "7 days" could be anything to God, and who's to say that when He made Adam, He didn't just pick an ape he liked and tinker with the genes?

I've always thought of it like that. We're on the same wavelength there.
UsaSatsui wrote:
Religious people are not necessarily moral, and moral people are not necessarily religious. Religion does, however, teach moral values and is a handy tool for preserving them to teach to future generations, as well as give an incentive for following them. You don't have to be a Christian to believe that stealing and killing are wrong, but those ideas are ingrained in our society through Christian beliefs, so that's what our society believes to be moral.

Well said.
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: