Author |
Message |
Ghandi
Title: Alexz Aficionado
Joined: May 21 2008
Posts: 2889
|
I saw a midnight showing of this movie tonight as was very happy with much darker they made it.
I HAVE read all the books so notice all the stuff they take out of the movie. This time being unclear connections to the "Half Blood Prince" except in passing footage of the books pages. Normally, a Scooby gang investigation takes place by someone to figure it out, which was not entirely so in this story. It's definitely more of a reveal in the book of the identity.
I don't know who has read the books and who hasn't, so I'll let this topic go its own way until throwing in more details that could be spoilers for people who haven't seen it yet.
|
|
|
   |
|
Lady_Satine
Title: Head of Lexian R&D
Joined: Oct 15 2005
Location: Metro area, Georgia
Posts: 7287
|
I have to confess I've only read the first book and a few chapters of the last. But I've seen every movie. Saw this one at midnight as well and saw a LOT of jailbait, good times.
|
 "Life is a waste of time. Time is a waste of life. Get wasted all the time, and you'll have the time of your life!" |
|
   |
|
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 11244
|
I haven't had the opportunity to see it yet, but I did just get a few free movie passes for my birthday, so I think I'll take a trip out tonight or tomorrow if I can. It looks good and I've been a fan of the movies (I haven't read any of the books).
|
|
|
   |
|
Milhouse
Joined: Dec 19 2008
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 485
|
I've read all of the books and I think they're great. I think the first movie is the most loyal to the books, but who cares; if you've read the book, you shouldn't be upset that the movie leaves stuff out.
Though some movies are great, books will always be better, like Slaughterhouse 5 and The Color Purple.
|
|
|
  |
|
ChkChkBLAM
Title: Onomatopeabrain
Joined: Jul 07 2009
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 71
|
I've read all of the books... I liked the first two movies, but I hated the third and haven't watched any of them since then. Maybe I'll give this one a try...
|
|
|
  |
|
username
Title: owner of a lonely heart
Joined: Jul 06 2007
Location: phoenix, az usa
Posts: 16127
|
never read any of the books or seen any of the movies. actually, i saw the first 10 minutes of the last harry potter movie before i snuck into another movie.
w/that being said, i dont think this would be my jumping off point to watch harry potter. but from what i have heard from my nephews and sister in law, this was a good movie
|

Klimbatize wrote: |
I'll eat a turkey sandwich while blowing my load |
|
|
     |
|
ReeperTheSeeker
Joined: Aug 26 2007
Posts: 2752
|
I've read all 7 a long time ago and only saw up to the 4th movie, so i can agree there will be some thing missing from the book in the movie. But there is one thing that baffles me:
the fact the movie is PG, did they really cut out enough to make it PG? The last 2 movies were PG-13 so i figured as the series progressed the more mature the movies would be, since the book series seemed to grow up from #1-#7. I'm not saying it would be R but rather keep the PG-13 rating. Hell Transformers is PG-13, so why not the 6th Harry Potter movie?
Anyway i stopped watching the film series because it felt like the books offered more and since Chris Columbus left as director, the movies seemed to lose there charm.
Also, is it true they will be splitting up the 7th movie into 2 parts?:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Potter_(film_series)#Films
If that's the case they why didn't they do that for the other movies like the 4th one which was missing a lot of shit from the book. Have the first part released in the first Q1 of the year and the second part in the Q4.
|
|
|
  |
|
blackrattism
Joined: May 21 2009
Posts: 21
|
I think this movie was the most disappointing so far, if you haven't read the books and aren't familiar with the canon I think it is just going to confuse the crap out of you. There's important stuff in there without which the movie (and the next two) won't make sense, but a lot of times this is reduced to a one second cut or a half-line cut off by another character. I caught it, but a lot of people will miss it. Things like what Dumbledore is supposed to be experiencing in the cave (without giving spoilers) is kind of important in the next book, but is hardly discernible from his lines in the movie.
Too much time spent developing relationships that didn't really further the plot, too little time on the serious themes from the book, like loyalty and trust.
|
|
|
  |
|
SoldierHawk
Moderator
Title: Warrior-Poet
Joined: Jan 15 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6107
|
blackrattism wrote: |
I think this movie was the most disappointing so far, if you haven't read the books and aren't familiar with the canon I think it is just going to confuse the crap out of you. There's important stuff in there without which the movie (and the next two) won't make sense, but a lot of times this is reduced to a one second cut or a half-line cut off by another character. I caught it, but a lot of people will miss it. Things like what Dumbledore is supposed to be experiencing in the cave (without giving spoilers) is kind of important in the next book, but is hardly discernible from his lines in the movie.
Too much time spent developing relationships that didn't really further the plot, too little time on the serious themes from the book, like loyalty and trust. |
I haven't read the books since the third, but I think I mostly got the gist of what was going on. I think a large part of that has to do with the fact I love Snape, though, and made it a point to find out his story, so I knew what was going on with Dumbledore, the Death Eaters, et al. If I hadn't known that, I would have been confused as shit.
Would you mind letting me in on what was going on with Dumbledore in the cave though, when he drank that stuff? That really DID confuse me. I mean I could tell it was bad, and I *THINK* it maybe had to do with...making him relive all the things he feels guilty about? (That guess is based on one line he mumbles while drinking it though, so I could be totally wrong.)
Can I just say too, I really wish the special effects people hadn't totally ripped off the LoTR movies. When I saw the dead people, all I could think of was Gollum, and you CAN'T tell me that Dumbledore's fire spell didn't instantly have you thinking, "where the fuck did Gandalf come from all of a sudden?!"
Overall, I really liked the movie up until the last, about 15 minutes (after Dumbledore and Harry get off the island.) It all goes to shit after that. They couldn't have made Dumbledore's death more anticlimactic, and DAMMIT they needed more of Snape's reaction to what he'd done, not to mention more interaction between him and Harry.
|
William Shakespeare wrote: |
Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none. |
|
|
    |
|
Douche McCallister
Moderator
Title: DOO-SHAY
Joined: Jan 26 2007
Location: Private Areas
Posts: 5672
|
SoldierHawk wrote: |
They couldn't have made Dumbledore's death more anticlimactic, and DAMMIT they needed more of Snape's reaction to what he'd done, not to mention more interaction between him and Harry. |
Dumbledore dies?! What's next Ron Weasley? Snape?
|
|
|
   |
|
ReeperTheSeeker
Joined: Aug 26 2007
Posts: 2752
|
Douche McCallister wrote: |
SoldierHawk wrote: |
They couldn't have made Dumbledore's death more anticlimactic, and DAMMIT they needed more of Snape's reaction to what he'd done, not to mention more interaction between him and Harry. |
Dumbledore dies?! What's next Ron Weasley? Snape? |
The 7th book basically starts killing people off that don't matter to the plot or were destined to die anyway. Look it up on wiki, i refuse to be a spoiler.
|
|
|
  |
|
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 11244
|
Can we get a few things done in this thread?
1) Change the title to include the word "Spoilers".
2) Agree to only discuss up until the end of this movie, not discuss book 7 (movies 7 & 8 ).
|
|
|
   |
|
Ghandi
Title: Alexz Aficionado
Joined: May 21 2008
Posts: 2889
|
GPFontaine wrote: |
Can we get a few things done in this thread?
1) Change the title to include the word "Spoilers".
|
Done
#2 will have to be agreed on by everyone, though as far as I know I posted no spoilers.
Looks like Monday will be the best day for the best discussion then, when the numbers come in and we find out 80% of the population saw it.
|
|
|
   |
|
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 11244
|
Now that everyone knows that there are spoilers, I don't have to feel bad about ruining stuff...
So as far as I knew, Dumbledore was dying from the curse on his hand. It appeared to be spreading a bit as the movie went on. Regardless of events that unfolded during the movie, he would have died a horrible cursed death. Right? Not to mention that he had just drank that awful liquid that seemed to make him lose the majority of his sanity (not sure how permanent that was). What makes this especially interesting is that Snape didn't kill Harry at the end of the movie when he clearly had the opportunity. I am not thoroughly convinced that he is a bad guy. I think it is possible that he and Dumbledore were conspiring to find those Horcrux items and have someone who can double cross Voldemort at the end.
I may be way off here, but Dumbledore could have very easily stopped Malfoy. He let himself get trapped in that situation... almost purposefully to have Snape there.
Also, why wouldn't Snape have alerted the others about Harry under the stairs right after Dumbledore was killed?
|
|
|
   |
|
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
Posts: 7565
|
I saw it tonight, and I think birds really need to stay the hell away from Hogwarts. They got abused like hell in this film.
I thought it was good, up until the first half. Three things REALLY bugged the hell out of me.
1) The scene in the middle of the film with Bellatrix, Greyback, and the Burrow being lit on fire. Nothing even REMOTELY similar happens in the book, and in fact the books state that (up until 1/3 of the way through the 7th book) that the Burrow is horribly well protected. I'm all cool with giving Helena Bonham Carter more screen time (holy SHIT that's perfect casting, almost better than Alan Rickman) and I know she needs to be built up as a villain a bit, but really, that was bullshit, and there was no need for it. I'm not complaining they added a new scene mind. Just that the new scene was very stupid.
2) The scene where Harry hits Malfoy with the Sectumsempra (sp?) spell. Harry gets off without anything but a dirty look for that? "Oh, the Potter kid nearly killed someone? Oh those schoolkids and their wacky hijinks..." Right. Also, while it's probably nothing to get worked up about, in the movie he willingly ditches the book and Ginny helps him. In the book, he goes out of his way to KEEP the book, and only hides it to keep Snape from finding it...and Ginny actually supports him keeping the book.
3) The end of the film. There was supposed to be a HUGE GOD DAMN BATTLE between the good guys and bad guys there! Okay, I can see it being cut, yeah, but it just plain pissed me off the way they just waltzed out of there like that. Someone's blowing up the dining hall of the school where the most powerful wizards in the country teach....why do they get away with this? At the very least, it should have been a panicked flight, like in the book. Also, Bellatrix was not there. No complaints, though.
I thought the love-love stuff was light-hearted and funny, and they did a great job on the effects. The cursed necklace part was just disturbingly creepy, and even though everyone knew it was coming, the Inferi swarming the island scared the fuck out of everyone there when they appeared, and the wall of fire by Dumbledore was completely awesome.
Ninja Edit: I also liked how they occasionally cut away to Draco. It was kind of nice to see what he was up to.
Anyways, I'll answer some questions
THIS SHIT CONTAINS SPOILERS, SO IF YOU DON'T WANT TO KNOW, DON'T READ IT
(I stay away from serious book 7 ones, however, so don't be afraid, GP)
Quote: |
Things like what Dumbledore is supposed to be experiencing in the cave (without giving spoilers) is kind of important in the next book, but is hardly discernible from his lines in the movie. |
It's not significant to the story. It is significant to his backstory, though, which will likely also be glossed over.
Quote: |
Would you mind letting me in on what was going on with Dumbledore in the cave though, when he drank that stuff? That really DID confuse me. I mean I could tell it was bad, and I *THINK* it maybe had to do with...making him relive all the things he feels guilty about? (That guess is based on one line he mumbles while drinking it though, so I could be totally wrong.) |
He is indirectly (or possibly directly) responsible for the death of his sister. There's a bit more to it than that, but those are the guilty feelings he's reliving when he drank the potion. And yeah, you got that right...I thought he was reliving the pain of the kids young Voldemort tortured.
Quote: |
So as far as I knew, Dumbledore was dying from the curse on his hand. It appeared to be spreading a bit as the movie went on. Regardless of events that unfolded during the movie, he would have died a horrible cursed death. |
Yes, he was, and yes, he would have.
Quote: |
What makes this especially interesting is that Snape didn't kill Harry at the end of the movie when he clearly had the opportunity. |
Voldemort is under the impression that he himself must kill Harry Potter to fulfill the prophecy, and therefore has ordered that nobody else can kill him.
Quote: |
I may be way off here, but Dumbledore could have very easily stopped Malfoy. He let himself get trapped in that situation... almost purposefully to have Snape there. |
The book explains this. Voldemort had threatened Draco's family as well. If Draco failed, he would have killed the Malfoys. Dumbledore acted this way to protect him and his family. In the end, he offers to help Draco hide his family, and before Draco can answer, the rest of the Death Eaters show up.
Quote: |
Also, why wouldn't Snape have alerted the others about Harry under the stairs right after Dumbledore was killed? |
This part in the movie was SO. FUCKING. STUPID. I don't know why they just didn't go with the original script (maybe they were sick of using the invisibility cloak). Harry choosing not to act is completely out of character for him.
Anyways, in the book, Harry is under his cloak and leaving the tower when Draco burts open the door with an Expeliarmus on Dumbledore. Rather than defend himself, he paralyzes Harry instead. So Harry is completely unable to act at all until the spell wears off with Dumbledore's death, and furthermore, nobody (not even Snape) knew he was up there in the first place.
|
|
|
  |
|
ReeperTheSeeker
Joined: Aug 26 2007
Posts: 2752
|
so in short Usa, the movie is meh? What if we are familiar with the book, would we be pissed of all the changes?
|
|
|
  |
|
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
Posts: 7565
|
ReeperTheSeeker wrote: |
so in short Usa, the movie is meh? What if we are familiar with the book, would we be pissed of all the changes? |
It's good except for some very irritating scenes.
And I really can't answer the second one. I'm sure hordes of slavering fanboys are out there somewhere bitching about every single little change, but it doesn't bother me too much. Except for the three things I mentioned, it's all minor stuff.
|
|
|
  |
|
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
Posts: 24882
|
Does this really need a spoiler tag? The book's barely four years old, and sold like a billion copies. And unless this is your first day on the internet, you probably know that
SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE
If you didn't read the book, you deserve to have the movie spoiled for you.
|
|
|
     |
|
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
Posts: 7565
|
Syd Lexia wrote: |
Does this really need a spoiler tag? The book's barely four years old, and sold like a billion copies. And unless this is your first day on the internet, you probably know that
SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE
If you didn't read the book, you deserve to have the movie spoiled for you. |
It's the 7th book GP apparently doesn't want spoiled.
|
|
|
  |
|
SoldierHawk
Moderator
Title: Warrior-Poet
Joined: Jan 15 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6107
|
|
    |
|
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
Posts: 7565
|
SoldierHawk wrote: |
The point could have been made without shouting a spoiler after someone had specifically requested that they be marked in this thread as a courtesy, Syd.  |
Honestly, that's about as much of a spoiler as "Luke, I am your father" or "Sephiroth kills Aeris"
|
|
|
  |
|
ReeperTheSeeker
Joined: Aug 26 2007
Posts: 2752
|
UsaSatsui wrote: |
SoldierHawk wrote: |
The point could have been made without shouting a spoiler after someone had specifically requested that they be marked in this thread as a courtesy, Syd.  |
Honestly, that's about as much of a spoiler as "Luke, I am your father" or "Sephiroth kills Aeris" |
WAIT?! SERIOUSLY!!!! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
|
|
|
  |
|
SoldierHawk
Moderator
Title: Warrior-Poet
Joined: Jan 15 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6107
|
|
    |
|
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 11244
|
Either way, I think it is appropriate that the title indicate that we aren't just discussing opinions of the movie, but the actual plot as well. It is only one word and it serves to make sure that people don't ruin the experience for each other.
|
|
|
   |
|
|