SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
How Many 5-Year Olds Could You Take On In A Fight?


Reply to topic
Author Message
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 07:35 am Reply with quote Back to top

http://www.howmanyfiveyearoldscouldyoutakeinafight.com/

It may come in handy someday to know.

I could apparently take on 18. Woo.
View user's profileSend private message
Lady_Satine
Title: Head of Lexian R&D
Joined: Oct 15 2005
Location: Metro area, Georgia
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 07:55 am Reply with quote Back to top

It says I could take 19.


"Life is a waste of time. Time is a waste of life. Get wasted all the time, and you'll have the time of your life!"
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
brellow
Joined: Mar 08 2011
Location: Ohio
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 12:10 pm Reply with quote Back to top

24 !


Photobucket
 
View user's profileSend private message
justdrop
Title: Supreme Overlord
Joined: Jan 11 2012
Location: Philadelphia
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 12:16 pm Reply with quote Back to top

28, but my numbers are probably skewed because I'd feel no remorse. It's not a baby-saving contest, it's a fight to the finish. Hold onto your diapers children, daddy's home.


Image
"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life."- Winston Churchill
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Thunderhorse
Title: This is DELICIOUS!
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 12:48 pm Reply with quote Back to top

23! Also, I can take on 31 90 year olds in a fight.


Image
This Is Tuna With Bacon
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailMSN Messenger
Klimbatize
2010 NES Champ
Title: 2011 Picnic/Death Champ
Joined: Mar 15 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 02:40 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Says I could take on 31. That number seems low, actually. So does everybody's. A five year old would go down after one punch.

I, like justdrop, have no morals when it comes to fighting. I've been gang-beaten too many times to feel bad for whoever I'm fighting.


Pretty much the greatest thread of all time: http://www.sydlexia.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=14789

Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
justdrop
Title: Supreme Overlord
Joined: Jan 11 2012
Location: Philadelphia
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 02:45 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Klimbatize wrote:
Says I could take on 31. That number seems low, actually. So does everybody's. A five year old would go down after one punch.

I, like justdrop, have no morals when it comes to fighting. I've been gang-beaten too many times to feel bad for whoever I'm fighting.



Image
"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life."- Winston Churchill
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Beach Bum
Joined: Dec 08 2010
Location: At the pants party.
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 02:49 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Says I could take on 28. I figure if it was a swarm of kids hellbent on attacking me like a pack of zombies I'd not feel very bad about fighting them. It does seem low though because a 5 year old isn't exactly going to have that great of endurance against a full grown adult. Unless it actually was a zombie child then it might actually be able to take more than one hit and keep coming.
View user's profileSend private message
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 03:28 pm Reply with quote Back to top

30 for me... if only I were taller.



 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Preng
Title: All right, that's cool!
Joined: Jan 11 2010
Location: Accounting Dept.
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 03:41 pm Reply with quote Back to top

26. I have reservations about beating up on tykes, and I'm pretty slender, but my reach is ridiculous.

At any rate, all I can think about is that dodgeball scene in Billy Madison.
View user's profileSend private message
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 04:56 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Wow. Looks like when the toddlers take over, I'm fucked.
View user's profileSend private message
@om*d
Title: Dorakyura
Joined: Jul 10 2010
Location: Castlevania
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 05:25 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I got 35. Fuck those 5 year olds. I would destroy them.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Boonjovi
Title: Electric Sex Pants
Joined: Dec 30 2009
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 06:23 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I get 20. Awesome lol


Image
"If you try to fix violence, with more violence, all you do is create violence" - Tom DeLonge.
 
View user's profileSend private messageMSN Messenger
Preng
Title: All right, that's cool!
Joined: Jan 11 2010
Location: Accounting Dept.
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 06:59 pm Reply with quote Back to top

UsaSatsui wrote:
Wow. Looks like when the toddlers take over, I'm fucked.

I'm sure if this poorly biased quiz included a relevant "Are you a killer white rabbit?" question, your score would be at least 50.
View user's profileSend private message
Klimbatize
2010 NES Champ
Title: 2011 Picnic/Death Champ
Joined: Mar 15 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 07:00 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Yeah, I wonder how many kids were added to my total when I said I had experience fighting off a Zerg swarm.


Pretty much the greatest thread of all time: http://www.sydlexia.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=14789

Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
The Flaming Schnitzel
Title: Tsar of all Russias
Joined: May 10 2011
Location: Minsk, Belarus
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 07:07 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Well. I guess I'm the ultimate loser in that I'd only be able to take on 12 kids.

On the plus side, I'd take 15 90 year olds. That's slight better, right?


Image Image Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
@om*d
Title: Dorakyura
Joined: Jul 10 2010
Location: Castlevania
PostPosted: Feb 01 2012 11:04 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Apparently I would take 43 90 year olds in a fight. Laughing


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Beach Bum
Joined: Dec 08 2010
Location: At the pants party.
PostPosted: Feb 02 2012 12:22 am Reply with quote Back to top

I can take 29 90 year olds apparently. Only one more than if I was battling a horde of 5 year olds. Really though old people would seem to be a lot less dangerous than a group of five year olds because a 90 year old generally isn't going to be anywhere near as fast as a small child. Plus the exertion of fighting might thin the group with heart attacks, saving you some effort. I'd certainly feel less bad about beating up an old person too, because they are old enough to understand the consequences of attacking someone.
View user's profileSend private message
Greg the White
Joined: Apr 09 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Feb 02 2012 01:11 am Reply with quote Back to top

30. The last question had me laughing pretty good.


So here's to you Mrs. Robinson. People love you more- oh, nevermind.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Bob Dylan`s Blues
Title: Worlds Strongest Man
Joined: Jun 08 2011
Location: Your nightmares
PostPosted: Feb 02 2012 02:14 am Reply with quote Back to top

Apparently I can take out 23 five year olds but only 18 90 year olds.

Beach Bum wrote:
I can take 29 90 year olds apparently. Only one more than if I was battling a horde of 5 year olds. Really though old people would seem to be a lot less dangerous than a group of five year olds because a 90 year old generally isn't going to be anywhere near as fast as a small child. Plus the exertion of fighting might thin the group with heart attacks, saving you some effort. I'd certainly feel less bad about beating up an old person too, because they are old enough to understand the consequences of attacking someone.

This. A swarm of five year olds would overtake you much faster, giving you less time to think and react. It would be much easier to set up a good kick to the face against 90 year olds. That's why I thought I would get a higher score against 90 year olds.
View user's profileSend private message
Klimbatize
2010 NES Champ
Title: 2011 Picnic/Death Champ
Joined: Mar 15 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
PostPosted: Feb 02 2012 03:02 am Reply with quote Back to top

Yeah, wtf? Says I could only take 23 90 year-olds.


Pretty much the greatest thread of all time: http://www.sydlexia.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=14789

Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
Bob Dylan`s Blues
Title: Worlds Strongest Man
Joined: Jun 08 2011
Location: Your nightmares
PostPosted: Feb 02 2012 03:31 am Reply with quote Back to top

I did a few other surveys and I'm apparently not very good at them. I have only a 39% chance of surviving a zombie apocalypse, same number as my overall nerdiness. On the plus side my dead body is worth almost five grand.
View user's profileSend private message
Sarge
Title: The Self-Titler
Joined: Aug 14 2010
PostPosted: Feb 02 2012 10:56 am Reply with quote Back to top

28. To hell with those little bastards.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
PostPosted: Feb 02 2012 11:18 am Reply with quote Back to top

90 year-olds may be physically less resilient, but damn, if you get that single war vet, they are going to bite, tear, stab and claw your face off.

I feel like little kids will bite and hit, but their lack of intent is what makes them less threatening.



 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
JoshWoodzy
Joined: May 22 2008
Location: Goshen, VA
PostPosted: Feb 02 2012 07:06 pm Reply with quote Back to top

28.

I'm scared.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: