SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
Super Wi-Fi?


Reply to topic
Author Message
Lady_Satine
Title: Head of Lexian R&D
Joined: Oct 15 2005
Location: Metro area, Georgia
PostPosted: Sep 16 2010 06:29 am Reply with quote Back to top

From http://www.geekosystem.com/

For as long as Wi-Fi has been around, its proponents have wanted to make it better, faster, and longer-range, but that process has been complicated by the physical realities of the radio standard: Current U.S. regulations limit its transmission to the 2.4 GHz band. (Gizmodo explains this further in a nifty article on why so many wireless gadgets are clustered at 2.4 GHz.) But after September 23rd, that may change: On that date, the FCC plans to vote on a set of rules allowing for a “super Wi-Fi” that’s transmitted over the unused airwaves between broadcast television channels and which could potentially “travel several miles and deliver Internet speeds ranging from 15 to 20 megabits per second – as fast as a cable modem.”

AP wrote:
Nearly two years ago, the FCC voted to open up the airwaves between broadcast TV channels – so-called “white spaces” – for wireless broadband connections that would work like Wi-Fi on steroids. But wrangling over key technical details, including concerns about interference with TV signals and wireless microphones, has prevented exploitation of these spaces.

Last year’s transition from analog to digital television broadcasting freed up enough spectrum to make this possible, but the plan faced serious opposition from television broadcasters worried that their signals could be disrupted. Wireless microphone manufacturers and users – including churches, theatres, karaoke bars and all types of performers – also raised concerns about interference.

To address these issues, the FCC has been working with broadcasters and white-spaces proponents to map TV channels across the country. The current FCC plan would require installers to configure white-spaces devices to use a frequency that’s vacant in their area – a white space. Alternatively, the devices themselves could figure out their location using such technologies as GPS; a database would then help the devices figure out the right frequencies for their area.


We aren’t holding our breaths — a regulatory shift of this magnitude will undoubtedly take time and compromise, and whatever tech solution is worked out to deal with the issue of variable local white space will need to, well, work in order to prevent widespread interference with other signals. But fast, long-range Wi-Fi is long overdue, and opening up TV bands may be just what’s needed to make true public Wi-Fi in many American cities a reality.


"Life is a waste of time. Time is a waste of life. Get wasted all the time, and you'll have the time of your life!"
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
awsgames
Joined: May 29 2010
PostPosted: Sep 16 2010 09:20 am Reply with quote Back to top

Holy cow, I hope they do this. That would be awesome.
View user's profileSend private message
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
PostPosted: Sep 16 2010 10:46 am Reply with quote Back to top

Comcast will find a way to make this more painful.

Then Google will kick Comcast in the balls.

After that the rest of the world will claim that Google stole the idea to kick Comcast in the balls and sue them for a bazillion dollars.

Google will win the law suite, but in the meantime Steve Jobs will go back to Japan and finally get his Ninja stars. He will hold Bill Gates hostage and take over Microsoft. With his near infinite money and power, Jobs will completely take over all desktops and cell phones with OS X 10.10 "Sphynx".

When Google finally goes to open up the Super Wi-Fi spectrum it will be a mute point because Apple will have proprietary control over all open source software which must conform to their liking and therefore can not access the available Super Wi-Fi.



 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
PostPosted: Sep 16 2010 11:11 am Reply with quote Back to top

I'm 95% sure you're being sarcastic, GP, but I thought that the public airwaves, and open access to them, were by definition available to all. So Apple couldn't have any sort of control over them.

Anyways, this would be awesome.
View user's profileSend private message
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
PostPosted: Sep 16 2010 12:39 pm Reply with quote Back to top

GPFontaine wrote:
Comcast will find a way to make this more painful.

Then Google will kick Comcast in the balls.

After that the rest of the world will claim that Google stole the idea to kick Comcast in the balls and sue them for a bazillion dollars.

Google will win the law suite, but in the meantime Steve Jobs will go back to Japan and finally get his Ninja stars. He will hold Bill Gates hostage and take over Microsoft. With his near infinite money and power, Jobs will completely take over all desktops and cell phones with OS X 10.10 "Sphynx".

When Google finally goes to open up the Super Wi-Fi spectrum it will be a mute point because Apple will have proprietary control over all open source software which must conform to their liking and therefore can not access the available Super Wi-Fi.

And before all of this, such heavy use of these frequencies will give us all cancer.


I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Andrew Man
Title: Is a Funklord
Joined: Jan 30 2007
Location: Annandale, VA
PostPosted: Sep 16 2010 12:50 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Jesus, I can't believe the range that Super Wi-Fi would potentially cover.


My Muzaks! CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.facebook.com/hellodharmaband

3DS is very good, and Wii U!

 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
PostPosted: Sep 16 2010 12:56 pm Reply with quote Back to top

UsaSatsui wrote:
I'm 95% sure you're being sarcastic, GP, but I thought that the public airwaves, and open access to them, were by definition available to all. So Apple couldn't have any sort of control over them.

Anyways, this would be awesome.

It was just my way of saying that a few huge corporations are probably going to fuck this all up even though it is best for the greater good.

I think the idea of a broadband for everyone is healthy and necessary. Current ISPs probably disagree though since it equates to less money in their pockets.



 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Burt Reynolds
Title: Bentley Bear
Joined: Apr 07 2008
Location: California
PostPosted: Sep 16 2010 01:00 pm Reply with quote Back to top

GPFontaine wrote:
Comcast will find a way to make this more painful.

Then Google will kick Comcast in the balls.

After that the rest of the world will claim that Google stole the idea to kick Comcast in the balls and sue them for a bazillion dollars.

Google will win the law suite, but in the meantime Steve Jobs will go back to Japan and finally get his Ninja stars. He will hold Bill Gates hostage and take over Microsoft. With his near infinite money and power, Jobs will completely take over all desktops and cell phones with OS X 10.10 "Sphynx".

When Google finally goes to open up the Super Wi-Fi spectrum it will be a mute point because Apple will have proprietary control over all open source software which must conform to their liking and therefore can not access the available Super Wi-Fi.
Then Google will come out with a competent Desktop OS, which will have access to the new WiFi, but everyone will just stick with Apple anyway because it has a pretty interface and sleek design.


Dances with Wolves 2 is gonna ROCK!
 
View user's profileSend private messageMSN Messenger
Mr. Satire
Joined: Jun 08 2010
Location: Termina Field
PostPosted: Sep 17 2010 11:14 am Reply with quote Back to top

Isn't this kind of wireless technology already called WiMAX or some other thing, or am I confusing this with some other technology? Also, if this does get put into use, (Particularly if it is WiMAX) wouldn't you need extra hardware (Special WiFiWhatever wireless hardware, USB thingies, ect.) to use it?


Image
Signature by Hacker (RIP)
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: