| Author | Message | 
	
		| eatpork 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				
			 
				Joined: May 24 2010
			 
				Location: Detroit, Michigan
			 
				Posts: 91
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				Some of my favorites:
 Ingmar Bergman (Fanny and Alexander, Wild Strawberries)
 John Cassavetes (Faces, Husbands)
 Andrei Tarkovsky (Andrei Rublev, Nostalghia)
 Kar Wai Wong (Chungking Express, Fallen Angels)
 Harmony Korine (Gummo, Julien-Donkey Boy)
 |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|   | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Klimbatize 
 
				2010 NES Champ
			 
				
			 
				Title: 2011 Picnic/Death Champ
			 
				Joined: Mar 15 2010
			 
				Location: Las Vegas, NV
			 
				Posts: 5000
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				Is a toss-up between Michael Bay and...oh who am I kidding? It's Michael Bay, all the way.
				 |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|    | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Doddsino 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				
			 
				Joined: Oct 01 2009
			 
				
			 
				Posts: 5316
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				In no particular order:
 Sergio Leone
 Billy Wilder
 Stanley Kubrick
 Christopher Nolan
 Steven Spielberg
 Terry Gilliam
 David Cronenberg
 David Lynch
 Martin Scorsese
 The Coen Brothers
 Paul Thomas Anderson
 Wes Anderson
 |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|   | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| SoldierHawk 
 
				Moderator
			 
				
			 
				Title: Warrior-Poet
			 
				Joined: Jan 15 2009
			 
				Location: San Diego, CA
			 
				Posts: 6113
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				Yeah, Bergman is definitely on my list. Just...he's brilliant. He just is. 
 Danny Boyle would probably be second on my list. I have yet to see one movie from him that's not completely brilliant. (Sunshine, 28 Days Later, Trainspotting, etc...) and I was so thrilled when he won an Oscar for Slumdog Millionare. He's done much better films than that, but eh...at least he finally got the recognition he deserves.
 
 As much as I love him though, Steven Spielberg would have to be my favorite of all time. I mean, Close Encounters, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Jaws, Schlinder's List....I mean come ON. His resume is insane, and reads like a top ten list of my favorite films.
 |  
				|     
| William Shakespeare wrote: |  
| Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none. |  |  | 
	
		|     | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Syd Lexia 
 
				Site Admin
			 
				
			 
				Title: Pop Culture Junkie
			 
				Joined: Jul 30 2005
			 
				Location: Wakefield, MA
			 
				Posts: 24886
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				Carpenter, Cronenberg, Gilliam, Lynch are my top four, because they have style.
 Most othe directors seems to just take a good script, a good cast, and a bunch of money, throw them together and hope for the best. To be fair though, it takes a decent amount of talent to recognize a good script. Or to write one.
 |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|      | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| SoldierHawk 
 
				Moderator
			 
				
			 
				Title: Warrior-Poet
			 
				Joined: Jan 15 2009
			 
				Location: San Diego, CA
			 
				Posts: 6113
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				While part of me agrees with you Syd, a larger part firmly believes that, in spite of its brilliant script, Raiders of the lost Ark, while it would have been good without Spielberg on its own merits, would not be nearly the icon it is today if not for him. Same goes for Schindler's List. ...Or 28 Days Later, Sunshine and Slumdog Millionare without Boyle, for that matter.
				 |  
				|     
| William Shakespeare wrote: |  
| Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none. |  |  | 
	
		|     | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| mr. retro 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				Title: Jurassic Park Fanboy
			 
				Joined: Apr 14 2010
			 
				Location: Westbridge, BC, Canada
			 
				Posts: 21
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				While I love Spielberg's movies (Indiana Jones, E.T., Saving Private Ryan, and of course, the Jurassic Park films) first place for my favorite director has to go to a certain Mr. Quentin Tarantino. He has brilliant visions. His scripts are orgasmically good, and he's a pretty good actor as well. Robert Zemeckis is awesome as well.
				 |  
				|  Jurassic Park IV is never going to get made. Face it.  |  | 
	
		|     | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| jprime 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				
			 
				Title: Ex-GameWinners
			 
				Joined: Jan 27 2008
			 
				Location: Southern Ontario
			 
				Posts: 7047
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				I'm partial to Roland Emmerich. I know he has a lot of critics, but there's just something about his style that strikes a chord with me.
				 |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|   | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Syd Lexia 
 
				Site Admin
			 
				
			 
				Title: Pop Culture Junkie
			 
				Joined: Jul 30 2005
			 
				Location: Wakefield, MA
			 
				Posts: 24886
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				
| SoldierHawk wrote: |  
| 28 Days Later, Sunshine and Slumdog Millionare without Boyle, for that matter. |  
I really cannot stand 28 Days Later, and as a soldier it should offend you. The first two acts are brilliant, absolutely brilliant. But once they meet the British Army it's all down hill: "We haven't had sex in 28 days, we need to rape the womenfolk to 'repopulate' England. Yeah... repopulate."
 
These are supposed to be trained soldiers. The best of the best, and they're turned into idiots. It's shameful. It's not a realistic scenario, and anyone who thinks it is is far too cynical for my liking.
				 |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|      | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Teralyx 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				Title: Master Exploder
			 
				Joined: Jun 04 2008
			 
				Location: Goldenrod City
			 
				Posts: 1419
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				
| Syd Lexia wrote: |  
| 
| SoldierHawk wrote: |  
| 28 Days Later, Sunshine and Slumdog Millionare without Boyle, for that matter. |  I really cannot stand 28 Days Later, and as a soldier it should offend you. The first two acts are brilliant, absolutely brilliant. But once they meet the British Army it's all down hill: "We haven't had sex in 28 days, we need to rape the womenfolk to 'repopulate' England. Yeah... repopulate."
 
 These are supposed to be trained soldiers. The best of the best, and they're turned into idiots. It's shameful. It's not a realistic scenario, and anyone who thinks it is is far too cynical for my liking.
 |  
I've been on a dry spell for 14 and a half years, and haven't raped anyone yet.
				 |  
				|  <TheFlamingSchnitzel> Didn't your mom teach you not to punch girls? 
 
<FigNewton> I was too busy /punchin' her/  |  | 
	
		|   | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| LowEndLem 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				Title: Not Gay
			 
				Joined: Mar 19 2009
			 
				Location: Illinois
			 
				Posts: 966
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				Because your lack the physical strength.
				 |  
				|  <docinsano>i beat off using save states
 
 <Tako> But, brontosaurs ate plants. It wouldn't be a threat to Jesus.
 
Why? Fuck you, that's why.  |  | 
	
		|    | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| username 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				Title: owner of a lonely heart
			 
				Joined: Jul 06 2007
			 
				Location: phoenix, az usa
			 
				Posts: 16135
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				and you're only 14 & 1/2 years old. you only started liking girls recently
				 |  
				|  
| Klimbatize wrote: |  
| I'll eat a turkey sandwich while blowing my load |  |  | 
	
		|      | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Blackout 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				Title: Captain Oblivious
			 
				Joined: Sep 01 2007
			 
				Location: That Rainy State
			 
				Posts: 10376
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				  
Yeah, don't rush it, you have plenty of time to grow up, try starting small with stalking and rifling through people's garbage. 
   |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|      | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| SoldierHawk 
 
				Moderator
			 
				
			 
				Title: Warrior-Poet
			 
				Joined: Jan 15 2009
			 
				Location: San Diego, CA
			 
				Posts: 6113
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				
| Syd Lexia wrote: |  
| 
| SoldierHawk wrote: |  
| 28 Days Later, Sunshine and Slumdog Millionare without Boyle, for that matter. |  I really cannot stand 28 Days Later, and as a soldier it should offend you. The first two acts are brilliant, absolutely brilliant. But once they meet the British Army it's all down hill: "We haven't had sex in 28 days, we need to rape the womenfolk to 'repopulate' England. Yeah... repopulate."
 
 These are supposed to be trained soldiers. The best of the best, and they're turned into idiots. It's shameful. It's not a realistic scenario, and anyone who thinks it is is far too cynical for my liking.
 |  
Nah. That's far, far less a commentary on soldiers and the military than it is a commentary on human nature. The way I read it, the soldiers just happened to be the ones with the training and equipment to survive but, had anyone else survived, it would have degenerated the same way. Lord of the Flies, man. 
 
Besides, military training has never stopped ANY army (including our own soldiers) from raping and murdering in a stressful, wartime situation. Very, very sad and shameful, but also a fact.
 
Now, the dark, depressing real life stuff said, I do agree with your assessment of the movie, kind of. The last act is definitely the weakest. It could have been handled much better. But I still love the movie (and Cillian Murphy.)
				 |  
				|     
| William Shakespeare wrote: |  
| Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none. |  |  | 
	
		|     | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Ash Burton 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				Title: AshRaiser
			 
				Joined: Nov 10 2008
			 
				Location: Florida
			 
				Posts: 1044
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				
| Syd Lexia wrote: |  
| 
| SoldierHawk wrote: |  
| 28 Days Later, Sunshine and Slumdog Millionare without Boyle, for that matter. |  I really cannot stand 28 Days Later, and as a soldier it should offend you. The first two acts are brilliant, absolutely brilliant. But once they meet the British Army it's all down hill: "We haven't had sex in 28 days, we need to rape the womenfolk to 'repopulate' England. Yeah... repopulate."
 
 These are supposed to be trained soldiers. The best of the best, and they're turned into idiots. It's shameful. It's not a realistic scenario, and anyone who thinks it is is far too cynical for my liking.
 |  
Apparently you have never met British Royal Marines.  I thought it was a pretty accurate description...
 
All kidding aside, my favorites would be Kubrick, Boyle The Cohens, and Gilliam.
				 |  
				|    
| joshwoodzy wrote: |  
| Ash is probably just home humping his SNES collection. 
 |  |  | 
	
		|    | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Vaenamoenen 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				
			 
				Joined: Mar 18 2010
			 
				Location: Tuonela
			 
				Posts: 299
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				Benson, Lynch and von Trier. Maybe in 10-20 years I'll namedrop Aronofsky and Sofia Coppola.
				 |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|   | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Stormtrooper2011 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				Title: Resident Stormtrooper
			 
				Joined: Jan 29 2009
			 
				Location: Tatoine
			 
				Posts: 236
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				Stephen Spielburg.
				 |  
				|  He Knows...
   |  | 
	
		|    | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Ross Rifle 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				Title: Rock N Roll God
			 
				Joined: Oct 29 2006
			 
				Location: Chilliwack, BC
			 
				Posts: 4844
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				Seriously Stormtrooper? SERIOUSLY?
				 |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|      | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Doddsino 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				
			 
				Joined: Oct 01 2009
			 
				
			 
				Posts: 5316
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				I forgot Tarantino, although I have to say he's either very good or just stupid.
 What I liked:
 Reservoir Dogs
 Pulp Fiction
 Inglorious Basterds
 
 What I rolled my eyes at:
 Jackie Brown
 Kill Bill 1 and 2
 Death Proof
 |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|   | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Pandajuice 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				Title: The Power of Grayskull
			 
				Joined: Oct 30 2008
			 
				Location: US and UK
			 
				Posts: 2649
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				The only Tarantino films I wasn't in love with were Jackie Brown (though it was still decent) and Inglorious Basterds. I know that's controversial, but I found the whole thing to be...off somehow and it left me less than satisfied at the end which was disappointing because I love Tarantino.
 I like the Coen brothers too, but they can be a bit hit or miss for me.
 |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|   | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Syd Lexia 
 
				Site Admin
			 
				
			 
				Title: Pop Culture Junkie
			 
				Joined: Jul 30 2005
			 
				Location: Wakefield, MA
			 
				Posts: 24886
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				The only way Inglorious Basterds could have been more insultingly stupid is if they replaced Brad Pitt's character with Anne Frank.
				 |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|      | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Klimbatize 
 
				2010 NES Champ
			 
				
			 
				Title: 2011 Picnic/Death Champ
			 
				Joined: Mar 15 2010
			 
				Location: Las Vegas, NV
			 
				Posts: 5000
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				
| Syd Lexia wrote: |  
| The only way Inglorious Basterds could have been more insultingly stupid is if they replaced Brad Pitt's character with Anne Frank. |  
Whoa, good idea. He should have gone all out and had Anne Franke unload a machine gun into Hitler's face, or maybe be the one to set the theater on fire. Definitely blew an opportunity there.
				 |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|    | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Doddsino 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				
			 
				Joined: Oct 01 2009
			 
				
			 
				Posts: 5316
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				Coen brothers are hit or miss for me as well. I didn't like Oh Brother Where Art Thou? and hated HATED the ending to No Country For Old Men.
				 |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|   | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| Pandajuice 
 
				
			 
				
			 
				Title: The Power of Grayskull
			 
				Joined: Oct 30 2008
			 
				Location: US and UK
			 
				Posts: 2649
			   | 
			
				| 
 
				
| Doddsino wrote: |  
| Coen brothers are hit or miss for me as well. I didn't like Oh Brother Where Art Thou? and hated HATED the ending to No Country For Old Men. |  
Me too! It was such a let down, I was pissed. However, Burn After Reading was absolutely glorious and a masterpiece if you ask me and Hudsucker Proxy is one of my most favorite films.
				 |  
				|  |  | 
	
		|   | 
	
		|   | 
	
		| SoldierHawk 
 
				Moderator
			 
				
			 
				Title: Warrior-Poet
			 
				Joined: Jan 15 2009
			 
				Location: San Diego, CA
			 
				Posts: 6113
			   |  | 
	
		|     | 
	
		|   | 
	
		|  |