Wrestling is in theory a young man's sport, but old dudes have been main-eventing for quite a while now, even back in the 70s and 80s. I feel Undertaker is the best big man of all time, as he's got a unique gimmick, great mic skills, wrestles really well, and does pretty much everything: high-flying, submissions, striking, power moves, etc. I think he's good to go in sporadic bursts for another five years or so.

It really bothers me that Mysterio was rewarded for breaking Taker's face with the WHC. I also hope that it doesn't end up being revealed that Kane is the one who attacked him(if it hasn't already, haven't watched Smackdown in a week or two), since it would be another rehash of their feud that Taker would end up dominating, instead of a chance to elevate a younger, newer heel.

If nothing else, Undertaker has inspired me to roll my eyes back in my head whenever I'm in a picture, if applicable. I suppose I don't do it as much now, but I did it at a friend's wedding several years ago in a giant photo with everyone in it, which really pissed off some old lady fart or something.

Heel Mysterio happened in WCW, if I recall. Didn't see it, I just know it happened. They'll never turn him heel - way too much merchandise, plus he's a hero to the kiddies. He did have some really good matches last year, but this year it seems like he's kind of running the same pace and being complacent.

Besides, if you consider what the storyline is saying, that someone beat the shit out of Undertaker so much that he's in a coma, it doesn't seem likely that Mysterio could have done it. Wrestling isn't about always being believable, but that would be a ridiculous stretch.

Man, I know it's going to be Kane. They've run through pretty much everyone in the main-event scene. Kurt Angle 2.0 is about the last guy, unless Kane actually accuses Mysterio in dramatic fashion, instead of casual fashion. I'm not sure who would be best served by it, or how they would say they did it. Ziggler took the clock back to 1990 and put him in an extended sleeper hold? McIntyre complained to McMahon about him and hit him with a shitty DDT?

I think the best thing would be a collaborative effort from most of the heels on the show, kind of like how a lot of the heels conspired to cause him to lose a casket match in the 90s. I don't remember who it was against, Yokozuna I think. Anyway, if that happened, when he came back, he could just start beating people up left and right/having matches against them, eventually culminating by taking on the SES or Swagger or someone at the top. Like Kurt Angle's storyline, only about revenge, instead of championship glory.

RVD left after One Night Stand 2007. He was written out by Orton punting him in the head against a steel post after RVD won their stretcher match. In reality, RVD left because he hated WWE and couldn't take more than a year of WWECW dream crushing. He is in TNA as the current TNA Champion.

Heel Cena would be a refreshing change of pace. It would also depend on how he was used. Heel Batista was almost a parody of face Batista: instead of backing down from no one, he made constant excuses and complained about everything. If the fans were popping for him hitting the Batista Bomb on someone, he wouldn't do it, just to piss them off. And while he was booked in the Main Event heavily, he only had a month title reign. If heel Cena was champion almost constantly like face Cena is, I think it would still get aggravating. Same with if he squashed everyone in his path relentlessly, because that's what current Cena does.

That's true, he spends a lot of time in the match getting his ass kicked. However, once the 5 Moves of Doom start in(6 if you count the STF), it's over pretty much every time, unless it's a PPV, then it might stretch out a bit more. The last time he lost cleanly that I can remember is Hell in A Cell against Orton, which was well over half a year ago. And as for tapping out, I believe the last time that happened was against Benoit in either late 2003 or early 2004. Out of all his WWE Title reigns, only two of the times he lost the belt were legit, and one of those involved him eating 3 finishers in quick succession in an elimination chamber. Pretty much everything else involved interference or goonery of some kind, such as Batista and Edge taking the belt off of him after he won an elimination chamber. He's definitely talented, but what I see at the end of the day is what is put out by him and the writing - and that's Cena winning 19 times out of 20, and putting no one over. His feud with The Miz last year is a solid testament to this. I don't really feel like jumping through a table to lose the title helped put Sheamus over. I mean, come on, Cena has faced Big Show 5050350350 times, and I think Show has only pinned him once ever, after interference from Edge no less. Hell, the day after Show threw Cena through a light or something to cost him the World Title against Edge, he was up and walking around on RAW to cause Show to lose a match. They make him look like Superman. Cena losing a little more and looking more vulnerable would probably erase a lot of the hate sent his way.

HHH is notorious for not putting people over, but even on TV, I remember him losing to Shelton Benjamin several times. It depends on who you ask, and I'm not gonna kick that dead horse.

As for Undertaker, he squashes, but his match structure is better or worse depending on how you look at it. He has a small sequence of moves he goes through, and if he doesn't win that way, he randomly clamps on the Gogoplata/Hell's Gate, which gets him a win most of the time. It comes out of nowhere, often after he gets hit with a strong move or finisher, which makes it less believable, but the fact that it's a chokehold makes it look better than him randomly slamming someone and pinning them. He's had to put over some shitty wrestlers in his time - the Great Khali feud sticks out in particular. The nature of his character somewhat lends itself to being a badass, being supernatural and a larger wrestler, so it would make sense that he would lose less than HHH or Cena, but he loses more. JBL, Orton, Lesnar, HHH, Batista, he's put over a few people in title situations. I was very surprised that he made CM Punk's title reign last year look weak by taking the World Title after two months, but I thought I heard something about Punk doing something to offend Taker or WWE Management or something, so that would sense if that's true.