SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
Disappointing Games


Reply to topic
Author Message
Dorkus
Joined: Jul 19 2009
Location: England
PostPosted: Oct 04 2009 08:59 am Reply with quote Back to top

I've only purchased 2 games this year (Persona 4 for the PS2 and Dragon Quest V for the DS), and both have been awesome.
View user's profileSend private message
Ermac
Title: Thread Killer
Joined: Aug 04 2008
Location: Outworld
PostPosted: Oct 04 2009 04:41 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
Ermac wrote:
Leisure Suit Larry,King's Quest and Space Quest were all PC games that were geared towards the typical PC audience of the late 80's and early 90's but dont work today. That format died with the advent of games like Half-Life and other FPS that changed the face of PC gaming.

There's about a million things wrong with that statement, but I'm headed off to work so I can't currently address them. But I will.

please explain


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Oct 04 2009 07:16 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Ermac wrote:
Syd Lexia wrote:
Ermac wrote:
Leisure Suit Larry,King's Quest and Space Quest were all PC games that were geared towards the typical PC audience of the late 80's and early 90's but dont work today. That format died with the advent of games like Half-Life and other FPS that changed the face of PC gaming.

There's about a million things wrong with that statement, but I'm headed off to work so I can't currently address them. But I will.

please explain

First off, King's Quest, Leisure Suit Larry, and Space Quest weren't geared towards the "typical" PC audience because there was no "typical audience".

PC games are rarely advertised outside of trade magazines and the internet today, and it was like that back then too, minus the internet. Because neither the PC programming languages nor the PC media formats are proprietary, virtually any one with even minor talent could make a PC game. And thus, the PC market of the late 80s and early 90s was much like Atari 2600 market of the early 80's. There were a lot of games being produced, and there were very few outlets reviewing any of them. What this meant was that there was no quality control, and no easy way for the average consumer to tell what games were good and which ones were trash. Games became successful one of two ways, either by word of mouth, or by releasing shareware demos that were also spread by word of mouth. The Sierra games didn't capitalize on an existing market, they created a market that competitors such as Interplay and LucasArts would eventually try and weasel in on.

Secondly, King's Quest/Space Quest/Leisure Suit Larry were all geared towards different audiences. Space Quest was geared mostly towards Trekkies and other such science fiction fans, primarily young boys. Leisure Suit Larry was much more risque than most Sierra games and was geared towards adult males. There was no ESRB when the first LSL games came out, but the boxes clearly warned that the games were not for kids. And then there's King's Quest. King's Quest was far and away Sierra's most popular franchise, for two reasons. First off, it was the series that Roberta Williams was most directly involved in, and she did her best to make the games as clever and beautiful as possible, with King's Quest 5-7 being crowning achievements in this regard. Secondly, they had the most universal appeal. These were games filled with puzzles and literary/mythological references that kids and adults alike could appreciate. They were simply great games.

Thirdly, Half-Life did NOT kill point-and-click adventuring, and why you would choose to cite that instead of Doom, Wolfenstein, or Duke Nukem, which are the holy trinity of the FPS boom, is beyond me. And while the rise of the FPS did hurt Sierra, so did the oversaturation of the point-and-click market. The genre was working, and everyone jumped onboard and ran the genre into the ground. The same thing has happened to the FPS market. I am sick of FPS games. Unless they offer some interesting twist like Metroid Prime, XIII, Thief, or Timesplitters 2, I'm not interested. For all I know, Doom 3 could be the best FPS ever. But I've played so many Doom rip-offs since the original Doom came out that I just can't muster up enough interest in Doom 3 to even watch SOMEONE ELSE play it.

Fourthly, the FPS did not change the face of PC gaming. The business model remains the same: wait for someone else to strike gold, then shamelessly copy them. If you're the one who initially struck gold, then keep cranking out expansions and sequels until no one buys them anymore. One could argue that Blizzard has been so successful because they don't do this. The notoriously long waits they make their fans endure between sequels usually pay off for them in a big way. June 2010 will mark the 10th anniversary of Diablo 2, and there's still no release date for Diablo 3. When it finally does drop, it'll sell like gangbusters.

Okay, so that's four points, not a million. Sue me.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
ReeperTheSeeker
Joined: Aug 26 2007
PostPosted: Oct 04 2009 09:16 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Superman 64, that game had potential man . . . .

































































oh, there it is: This Is A Joke


ImageImageImage
Links, pics, vids . . . I shall post these when given the chance
Transformers 2 Review: ". . . Did i mention SHIT BLOWS UP?!!!"
 
View user's profileSend private message
BlazingGlory
Title: KANE LIVES IN DEATH!
Joined: Aug 10 2009
PostPosted: Oct 04 2009 09:41 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Well, I have an extensive list on this one, but I'll keep it short.
1. Fable/ Fable 2: For everything that Mr. Molyneux said this game would be, I expected Jesus to pop out of the box and serve me refreshments as I did nothing for the rst of my life but play these games, but it was not so. They were fun, but they didn't deliver on their promises too well.

2. Prototype: This game is very fun, excectp for the combat. The combat if overly frantic and devloves into button mashing in a matter of seconds. Also, half of the powers are totally worthless.

3. Crackdown: A fun game, but a few minor problems did exist, like the ENEMIES RESPAWN 10 SECONDS AFTER KILLING THEM! I died more times because of that.

4. Bioshock: Fun, but not as macgyver esque as I had hoped.

5. Spore: Do I really have to explain that one?
View user's profileSend private message
Aqua Hedgehog
Joined: Nov 02 2008
PostPosted: Oct 04 2009 09:44 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:

Thirdly, Half-Life did NOT kill point-and-click adventuring, and why you would choose to cite that instead of Doom, Wolfenstein, or Duke Nukem, which are the holy trinity of the FPS boom, is beyond me. And while the rise of the FPS did hurt Sierra, so did the oversaturation of the point-and-click market. The genre was working, and everyone jumped onboard and ran the genre into the ground. The same thing has happened to the FPS market. I am sick of FPS games. Unless they offer some interesting twist like Metroid Prime, XIII, Thief, or Timesplitters 2, I'm not interested. For all I know, Doom 3 could be the best FPS ever. But I've played so many Doom rip-offs since the original Doom came out that I just can't muster up enough interest in Doom 3 to even watch SOMEONE ELSE play it.

Would you call Heretic, Hexen, Strife, or System Shock 2 Doom ripoffs? Heretic was the first Doom ripoff, but was really fun because it was more combat oriented and open than Doom was, and Shadow of the Serpent Riders offered an episode more than Ultimate Doom did. Hexen was the first FPS ever to use classes and had some pretty mind-numbing puzzles, and Strife is considered to be Deus Ex's ancestor. Doom 3 looked great but the gameplay seemed pretty generic save for the flashlight switching which is a pain in the ass..
View user's profileSend private message
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Oct 04 2009 10:14 pm Reply with quote Back to top

If people are stil talking about the game 13 years later, chances are it was either really good or epically bad. There are dozens upon dozens of mediocre RPGs that no one remembers. Like Blake Stone. Or one of the Terminator ones.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Aqua Hedgehog
Joined: Nov 02 2008
PostPosted: Oct 04 2009 10:26 pm Reply with quote Back to top

BlazingGlory wrote:
Well, I have an extensive list on this one, but I'll keep it short.
1. Fable/ Fable 2: For everything that Mr. Molyneux said this game would be, I expected Jesus to pop out of the box and serve me refreshments as I did nothing for the rst of my life but play these games, but it was not so. They were fun, but they didn't deliver on their promises too well.

I actually like Fable 1, never tried 2, but heard it wasn't that good. And Syd, I think you mean FPS's.
I can't really talk about any NEW games that have me dissapointed, since I only play retro games.
View user's profileSend private message
Greg the White
Joined: Apr 09 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Oct 04 2009 11:02 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Aqua Hedgehog wrote:
BlazingGlory wrote:
Well, I have an extensive list on this one, but I'll keep it short.
1. Fable/ Fable 2: For everything that Mr. Molyneux said this game would be, I expected Jesus to pop out of the box and serve me refreshments as I did nothing for the rst of my life but play these games, but it was not so. They were fun, but they didn't deliver on their promises too well.

I actually like Fable 1, never tried 2, but heard it wasn't that good. And Syd, I think you mean FPS's.
I can't really talk about any NEW games that have me dissapointed, since I only play retro games.

As soon as I heard "Greatest game ever," and saw all of the delays, I figured Fable 1 would suck. It wasn't bad, a pretty fun little adventure game with flaws. Fable 2 was definitely a step-up in customization and your effect on the world, and with a fresh setting that's not used enough if you ask me.


So here's to you Mrs. Robinson. People love you more- oh, nevermind.
 
View user's profileSend private message
TARDISman
Title: Time Traveller
Joined: May 18 2009
Location: The End of Time
PostPosted: Oct 05 2009 12:01 am Reply with quote Back to top

Yeah Fable games are generally fun, personally I think of them as Elder Scrolls games with a smaller world but a bit more interactivity in the game world itself


RIP Hacker 1993-2014
"Paint me like one of your French Squids" -My buddy on Relm vs Ultros.
 
View user's profileSend private messageMSN Messenger
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Oct 05 2009 07:10 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Has anyone said Black & White yet? That game was total crap.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
TheRoboSleuth
Title: Sleuth Mark IV
Joined: Aug 08 2006
Location: The Gritty Future
PostPosted: Oct 05 2009 07:48 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
Has anyone said Black & White yet? That game was total crap.

THIS

I mean seriously, I remember developers jacking off to how awesome the AI on the critter was, and that thing was the stupidest thing ever devised. I don't know a single person who ever trained the thing to do anything useful.

And the villiagers bitched constantly, and the vaunted morality system was a binary of baby eating superevil and my little pony and rainbows good.

I don't get why Peter Molyneux is vaunted as some visionary game designer. He's all hype.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
TARDISman
Title: Time Traveller
Joined: May 18 2009
Location: The End of Time
PostPosted: Oct 06 2009 12:09 am Reply with quote Back to top

Oh man, I spent about 3 hours trying to get that damn game to work and then I got bored after mindlessly killing about 4 villagers.


RIP Hacker 1993-2014
"Paint me like one of your French Squids" -My buddy on Relm vs Ultros.
 
View user's profileSend private messageMSN Messenger
zombieplasticclock
Joined: Oct 11 2009
PostPosted: Oct 11 2009 03:04 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I tried the new Bionic Commando game for the 360. Absolute garbage. It doesn't even look like a 360 game, and the controls are terrible.

I know this game was released like almost a decade ago, but I tried Fallout 2 this year, after getting drawn in by Fallout 3. Not worth it

And I still don't get Spore. Granted, the cockasarus rex was funny at first, but anything good about Spore can just be found on Youtube.

X-Blades was also really crummy. It's just another game that tries to play like Devil May Cry, but instead ends up with a stiff, crummy control scheme. Which explains why every advert for this game basically is about how the main character chick doesn't wear any pants Rolling Eyes

I also wasn't so big on Mortal Kombat vs DC Universe. Granted, I loved Armageddon, but here I can't make Akuma with Kreate a Fighter. Matter of fact, there IS no KAF in MKvsDC. What I think needs to happen with Mortal Kombat is another change in Gameplay. what I mean is like the transition between MKII, and UMKIII: Mortal Kombat II had a relatively crummy gameplay style, I think, while in Ultimate Mortal Kombat 3, super speedy combos and faster gameplay set it apart from the previous titles. but now, the 3D MK games play in a very same manner. The other thing about Mortal Kombat vs DC that ticked me off was the censorship. Namely, the Joker's and Deathstroke's fatalities (although there are more censors, I'm sure). Now, I won't spoil them, but if you see them in-game (or on Youtube), you'll get what I mean. This series used to be infamous for gratuitous violence, and now they tone it down just to give it a "T" rating? lame. We need a new Mortal Kombat game, with awesome graphics, faster, better gameplay, and crazy amounts of violence. What do I have in mind? A 3-D remake of Ultimate Mortal Kombat 3. Hell yes.

...or another 2-D Mortal Kombat with digitized sprites would be awesome, too Very Happy
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: