SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
Another Entry for Texas madness


Reply to topic
Author Message
Lady_Satine
Title: Head of Lexian R&D
Joined: Oct 15 2005
Location: Metro area, Georgia
PostPosted: Aug 28 2011 02:21 am Reply with quote Back to top

From commondreams.org

What Did You Learn in School Today? (The Texas Version)

Millions of Texas students head back to school this week confronted by a dramatically altered, state-mandated social studies curriculum.

The contentious hearings of the Texas State Board of Education received considerable attention in the spring of 2010, but seem to have fallen out of the public consciousness as the new school year begins. The new curriculum, officially called the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills, deserves renewed attention, as it will undoubtedly surprise most Texans.

The fiercest battle during the board's hearings was fought over the 11th-grade history curriculum, which in Texas is "United States History since 1877." The exception to that timeline is the new state-mandated "Celebrate Freedom Week," during which students will learn about our founding fathers. That sounds simple enough, except that the only founding fathers included in the curriculum are Benjamin Rush, John Hancock, John Jay, John Witherspoon, John Peter Muhlenberg, Charles Carroll and Jonathan Trumbull Sr. What about George Washington, Thomas Jefferson or John Adams? They are nowhere to be found in the new high school TEKS. Students apparently learned everything they need to know about them in eighth grade.

As part of the board's effort to emphasize the positives in American history, students will no longer learn about "American imperialism." Instead students will discuss "American expansionism" and come to understand how "missionaries moved the United States into the position of a world power." The board eliminated mention of our government's use of propaganda during World War I, and instead of analyzing Truman's decision to use the atomic bomb at the end of World War II, students will now analyze the development of the bomb. Additionally, students will now "evaluate efforts by international organizations to undermine U.S. sovereignty." The board included Estee Lauder in the state curriculum, but not George Washington.

Perhaps you have heard something about a labor movement in the 20th century? No longer will your children. The only reference to a 20th-century labor movement will come when learning about Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta. No mention of the Fair Labor Standards Act or the National Labor Relations Act. No mention of strikes or any labor dispute. The words "labor movement" were taken out of the TEKS. Perhaps there is not enough time because students must now "understand how the free enterprise system drives technological innovation ... such as cell phones, inexpensive personal computers and global positioning products."

Students will learn about the contributions of Jerry Falwell's Moral Majority. Maybe the students will read Falwell's claim that feminists and homosexuals were partially responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Phyllis Schlafly, the Heritage Foundation and the NRA are all included. Students will also be required to "discuss the meaning of ‘In God We Trust.' "

History in Texas classrooms will be decidedly different from when we were students. I never learned "both the positive and negative impacts of ... country and western music" in my high school history class. Where would you rate Estée Lauder in terms of historical importance to our country? If you think she is one of the 68 most important historical figures, you agree with the board. Yes, the board included her in the state curriculum, but not George Washington.

I also never learned that the findings of the House Committee on Un-American Activities were confirmed, perhaps because it is not true. It puts teachers in an awkward position by asking them to teach something that is historically inaccurate. I will not have to deal with that issue in some of my classes because my Advanced Placement U.S. History classes are not required to follow the state curriculum. I am guessing that the Texas Education Agency realizes that students could never pass national exams while learning the state-mandated curriculum.

During the next decade, we should not be surprised when university professors lament that Texas students are not prepared for college. Malcolm X once said, "Education is the passport to the future, for tomorrow belongs to those who prepare for it today." You might remember a historical figure named Malcolm X, but your children won't. Malcolm X is not in the social studies curriculum in Texas. Now if you will excuse me, I have to do some research on Estée Lauder. She was not mentioned in any of my graduate history courses, either.

Craig Studer is a public school teacher in Austin, TX. He has a master's degree in curriculum and instruction and a master's degree in U.S. history.

==========================


WHAT!?
Seriously, I'm glad I'm well over with public schooling; anyone going to a public high school in Texas has my sympathies


"Life is a waste of time. Time is a waste of life. Get wasted all the time, and you'll have the time of your life!"
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Tomdincan
Title: Test Icicle
Joined: Oct 02 2010
Location: Temple Shalina
PostPosted: Aug 28 2011 08:14 am Reply with quote Back to top

The curriculum has changed quite a bit since I was a high school student. It's pretty frightening.

From my wife, who is a teacher here in Texas: "The State Board of Education is 50/50 educators and people that have ZERO experience. Those that do have experience in the field of education are so heavily politicized that it makes their background a moot point. When the bio on the educators on the board's website begins with "Evangelical Christian Republican" or "Blah Blah Democrat," it plainly shows that the decisions are partisan and not based on what's best for the kids.

And that's why we've decided to send our kids to private school.


I'm not a psychopath. I'm a high-functioning sociopath.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Lady_Satine
Title: Head of Lexian R&D
Joined: Oct 15 2005
Location: Metro area, Georgia
PostPosted: Aug 28 2011 02:02 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Tomdincan wrote:
And that's why we've decided to send our kids to private school.

I'm sure that puts a hurt on family finances, but I don't blame you in the least.


"Life is a waste of time. Time is a waste of life. Get wasted all the time, and you'll have the time of your life!"
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
PostPosted: Aug 28 2011 06:26 pm Reply with quote Back to top

If it's really this bad, it's worth every penny.


I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Preng
Title: All right, that's cool!
Joined: Jan 11 2010
Location: Accounting Dept.
PostPosted: Aug 28 2011 07:55 pm Reply with quote Back to top

ha HA! Texas - now leaving all the children behind.
View user's profileSend private message
Greg the White
Joined: Apr 09 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Aug 28 2011 08:34 pm Reply with quote Back to top

What can I say? Do I do the typical, text-book liberal whining about how everything is wrong and they should do things my way?

What I can say about this is that it's just fucked up. This isn't meant to educate, it's meant to pass on your world view. How is praising any sort of political idea different from some North Korean school teaching the kids that The Glorious Leader was born with 40 doves in his mouth or something? This is an indoctrination, and I think whether it would be a liberal or conservative plan, it's doing a disservice to our youth.

The more and more I think about it, Social Studies classes need to be an open discussion (I also think that the education system needs a massive reformation, but a rant for another time), because cherry-picking facts and twisting truths and trying to use both of these to come to a predetermined end and spewing them out is just propaganda, pure and simple. It decreases interest among the students, and is doing harm, because understanding past and current events in any field makes sure that we do not repeat mistakes. I had a great Government teacher in high school. His goal was to take his AP curriculum (advanced placement, for high-performing students and college credits), and be able to teach it to even his most remedial classes. He did this by engaging the students, getting talks going, clearing up cloudiness, and getting students to understand the importance of what they were learning as it related to them.

What is the end result of trying to teach students your own narrow-minded, cable-news-fed political beliefs? You either get them to your side (whatever the payoff is), alienate those who disagree, or leave the rest in the middle, bored and apathetic because they're caught between a bunch of adults trying to force the students into their beliefs.


So here's to you Mrs. Robinson. People love you more- oh, nevermind.
 
View user's profileSend private message
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
PostPosted: Aug 28 2011 10:35 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Can we start a class-action suit against the Texas State Board of Education? I may be a Christian, but I'm fairly sure that emphasizing Jerry Falwell in the state curriculum is a bad thing.


I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
MellowMeek
Joined: Feb 16 2010
Location: Texas
PostPosted: Aug 29 2011 06:03 pm Reply with quote Back to top

<.<

Uh..uh...thankfully I didn't go to school here!


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
aeonic
Title: Sporadic Poster
Joined: Nov 19 2009
Location: Kissimmee, FL
PostPosted: Aug 29 2011 08:07 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Just another reason (among many, minus Emo's and formerly TacoLand) to avoid Texas. Living in the US SW, I am so, SO very thankful I was educated in the NE before all this cuddly feel-good hand holding or plain uber-right indoctrination started spreading around.


Who likes role-playing games? Me. Way too goddamn much.
 
View user's profileSend private message
The Flaming Schnitzel
Title: Tsar of all Russias
Joined: May 10 2011
Location: Minsk, Belarus
PostPosted: Aug 29 2011 08:43 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Gosh I hate the education system. I dread the day I have kids and have to figure out where I want them to go to school...


Image Image Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: