SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
Double your homes!


Reply to topic
Author Message
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Jun 21 2010 05:12 pm Reply with quote Back to top

If you replace any one component of a house, it is still the same home.
So then, if you replace every single component of your house one at a time, it is still the same house.
But then, you can take all the original house components and assemble them into a house as well.
Then you will have two simultaneously existing copies of a singular house.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
i'll_bite_your_ear
Title: Distillatoria
Joined: Jun 09 2010
Location: van down by the river
PostPosted: Jun 21 2010 06:33 pm Reply with quote Back to top

i don't get it. when you put all your furniture in a different house then it is still different from your home. is that what you mean't at all?


it was the best of times
it was the blurst of times
 
View user's profileSend private message
JStrangiato
Title: El Hombre Strangiato
Joined: Jun 12 2007
Location: Texas
PostPosted: Jun 21 2010 08:22 pm Reply with quote Back to top

It's a take on an old philosophy question, the ship of Theseus. I'd weigh in as a fellow Philosophy major, but it's summer and I refuse to be intellectual when I don't have to.


My music/humor blog (R.I.P.): http://lavidastrangiato.blogspot.com/
Chondra "Mrs. Claudio" Sanchez on Enshin a.k.a. Jake Strangiato wrote:
I really like this person.

 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
i'll_bite_your_ear
Title: Distillatoria
Joined: Jun 09 2010
Location: van down by the river
PostPosted: Jun 21 2010 09:07 pm Reply with quote Back to top

i red it on german to understand it. i think answers on general are collectively compiled, so this special question has been not of big importance to mankind so it is unanswered till today. there is no hope that you find the answer, only time can tell.


it was the best of times
it was the blurst of times
 
View user's profileSend private message
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
PostPosted: Jun 21 2010 09:23 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
If you replace any one component of a house, it is still the same home.
So then, if you replace every single component of your house one at a time, it is still the same house.
But then, you can take all the original house components and assemble them into a house as well.
Then you will have two simultaneously existing copies of a singular house.

Try telling that to city hall.


I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
PostPosted: Jun 21 2010 09:49 pm Reply with quote Back to top

The cost of the components is usually higher than the cost of the sum of components, so you would double your homes, but at more than double the price.



 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
FNJ
2010 SLF Tag Champ
Joined: Jun 07 2006
PostPosted: Jun 22 2010 12:36 am Reply with quote Back to top

You'd still have to pay for land to put your extra house on.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
Alowishus
Joined: Aug 04 2009
PostPosted: Jun 22 2010 12:36 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Haha, very thought provoking. I'm glad i took a module in philosophy in my first year.
View user's profileSend private message
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
PostPosted: Jun 22 2010 01:42 pm Reply with quote Back to top

FNJ wrote:
You'd still have to pay for land to put your extra house on.

That's what I was hinting at.


I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Dr. Jeebus
Moderator
Title: SLF Harbinger of Death
Joined: Sep 03 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Jun 22 2010 01:47 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Dumbest philosophical argument ever.


dr.jeebus.sydlexia.com - Updated sometimes, but on hiatus!
UsaSatsui wrote:
The three greatest heels in history...Andy Kaufman, Triple H, and Dr. Jeebus

 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailAIM AddressYahoo Messenger
username
Title: owner of a lonely heart
Joined: Jul 06 2007
Location: phoenix, az usa
PostPosted: Jun 22 2010 01:50 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Dr. Jeebus wrote:
Dumbest philosophical argument ever.

THANK YOU.

almost as bad as whether achilles can beat the tortoise in a race


Klimbatize wrote:
I'll eat a turkey sandwich while blowing my load

 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM AddressYahoo MessengerMSN Messenger
Dr. Jeebus
Moderator
Title: SLF Harbinger of Death
Joined: Sep 03 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Jun 22 2010 01:56 pm Reply with quote Back to top

BTW, no you now have two different houses. You can have a philosophical argument over WHEN it becomes a new house, but when the last component is replaced, it is incontrovertibly NOT the original house, as there is no remaining piece of the original house. Basically, it goes from being the original house, to a refurbished house, to a completely new structure that just happens to occupy the same piece of land.


dr.jeebus.sydlexia.com - Updated sometimes, but on hiatus!
UsaSatsui wrote:
The three greatest heels in history...Andy Kaufman, Triple H, and Dr. Jeebus

 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailAIM AddressYahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: