SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
Wanda Sykes doesn't want you to say stuff is "gay"


Reply to topic
Author Message
Greg the White
Joined: Apr 09 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 07:15 pm Reply with quote Back to top

ross_rifle113 wrote:
Well does that mean prostitutes and your mom are gay then?


BURN!
Kirby ?


So here's to you Mrs. Robinson. People love you more- oh, nevermind.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Ross Rifle
Title: Rock N Roll God
Joined: Oct 29 2006
Location: Chilliwack, BC
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 07:16 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Well I guess so.


Does anybody here have a Ross Rifle?
www.thetwowordsmusic.com
www.myspace.com/rossrifle
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteMSN Messenger
Burt Reynolds
Title: Bentley Bear
Joined: Apr 07 2008
Location: California
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 07:34 pm Reply with quote Back to top

ross_rifle113 wrote:
Well does that mean prostitutes and your mom are gay then?


BURN!
Did you go to highschool?? It's a simple logic puzzle.
All homosexuals suck, but not everyone who sucks is a homosexual. Marcy sucks. Is she a homosexual? Answer: not enough information to determine if Marcy is a homosexual. So yes, other people do suck as well, but not all who suck are homosexuals.
Damn Canadian educational system. Cool Cool Cool


Dances with Wolves 2 is gonna ROCK!
 
View user's profileSend private messageMSN Messenger
Ross Rifle
Title: Rock N Roll God
Joined: Oct 29 2006
Location: Chilliwack, BC
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 07:39 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Touche my friend, touche.


Does anybody here have a Ross Rifle?
www.thetwowordsmusic.com
www.myspace.com/rossrifle
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteMSN Messenger
JRA
Joined: Sep 17 2007
Location: The Opium Trail
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 08:12 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I was reading a book called The bible of rock , and there was a section called "words that are underused in album reviews by critics" and one of the words was "Niggardly."

Discuss.


There are a lot of what if's in life Donny. What if I hit you really hard in the face, knocked yo shit to the back of yo skull? What if I....had you girl gargle my nuts? The fact remains, you are a fuckin mutant.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Douche McCallister
Moderator
Title: DOO-SHAY
Joined: Jan 26 2007
Location: Private Areas
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 08:13 pm Reply with quote Back to top

So gay first meant happy
Then somehow it got turned into meaning homosexual
Then it becomes slang for stupid.
Homosexuals = Homosexuals. Homosexuals do NOT = gay.
Sure they call themselves the "gay" community but its fucking retarded. I don't even think people call gay people "gays" anymore. Lesbians and Homo's thats all I ever hear.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
sidewaydriver
2010 SLF Tag Champ
Title: ( ͡� &#8
Joined: May 11 2008
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 08:46 pm Reply with quote Back to top

People who are intolerant to intolerance are hypocrites.


Shake it, Quake it, Space Kaboom.
 
View user's profileSend private message
anorexorcist
Title: Polar Bear
Joined: May 21 2008
Location: The Cock and Plucket
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 09:11 pm Reply with quote Back to top

sidewaydriver wrote:
People who are intolerant to intolerance are hypocrites.


Everybody is a hypocrite at some point or another.

You are either intolerant of differenct lifestyles, intolerant of intolerance or you just don't care about anything at all.

Gay means something is stupid now, not someone who is attracted to people of the same gender. If gay was turned into a derogatory term for homosexuals, then why the hell do you want to hold onto that title, instead of going with the politically correct "homosexual"?

It's kind of like if black people decided they wanted to be known as the "nigger community". A term that was made derogatory for a specific type of people and then all of a sudden they want to keep it = bullshit.

Now, if gay was never changed to demean homosexuals, then they stole a word that meant "happy" and made it refer to them. Now we want the word to mean stupid and they want to keep it as a word for themselves that is in no way negative? Well to bad, you changed the word from it's original meaning, now the majority has decided it should mean something else.

Happy used gay as an alternative meaning, then homosexuals took it so they would have an alternative word for their lifestyle, well now we want it as an alternative for something that is stupid. The word "gay" is a journeyman and homosxuals should not be so selfish as to hold it back from it's travels.


Lawyers, Guns and Money
 
View user's profileSend private messageMSN Messenger
TheRoboSleuth
Title: Sleuth Mark IV
Joined: Aug 08 2006
Location: The Gritty Future
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 09:38 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I love precision in the spoken word, so I don't use gay as a shorthand for stupid. Thats what stupid or its bounty of synonyms are for. Stop being lazy, learn to indulge in your language instead of falling back on old standbys.

That being said, I understand that the gay community might like Wanda Sykes, but she is terminally unfunny, not particularly photogenic, and known by those who do happen to know who she is to be a liberal harpy. The homosexual community has a veritable army of sympathetic liberals in the entertainment industry in addition to its own ranks. Couldn't they do better?


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
Greg the White
Joined: Apr 09 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 09:55 pm Reply with quote Back to top

No, you don't mean it as stupid. Gay has never meant stupid. By your logic, it still means that being gay is stupid. You mean to denigrate it by calling it homosexual. Deal with your stupid pigheadedness or just find another word.


So here's to you Mrs. Robinson. People love you more- oh, nevermind.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Cameron
Title: :O � O:
Joined: Feb 01 2008
Location: St. Louis, MO
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 10:08 pm Reply with quote Back to top

(Yep, can't find the delete button...)


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
Douche McCallister
Moderator
Title: DOO-SHAY
Joined: Jan 26 2007
Location: Private Areas
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 10:14 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Greg the White wrote:
No, you don't mean it as stupid. Gay has never meant stupid. By your logic, it still means that being gay is stupid. You mean to denigrate it by calling it homosexual. Deal with your stupid pigheadedness or just find another word.

But in the same token you can't call someone who is happy "gay" because it's considered to mean homosexual. So in the same manner we would be denigrating happy people. Maybe the Homosexual community should get another word or come up with their own...


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
Shut up, Dorn
Title: White Chocolate
Joined: Jan 04 2008
Location: Grate Whyte Norf
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 10:21 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Hillary Duff is gay? Spank. Bank.

I understand both sides of the argument, and I am going to side with the people who say "gay", because they have a right to free speech, regardless of whether it offends people or not. There is a line of political correctness, but it wont ever get in the way of me saying what I want to say.

wait, Hillary Duff is gay? Saweet.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Optimist With Doubts
Title: Titlating
Joined: Dec 17 2007
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 10:30 pm Reply with quote Back to top

So by the same logic that we don't want to stop people by saying because of freedom of speech does that mean it's fine to refer to haggling prices as "jewing it down"?


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM AddressYahoo Messenger
Douche McCallister
Moderator
Title: DOO-SHAY
Joined: Jan 26 2007
Location: Private Areas
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 10:35 pm Reply with quote Back to top

There is a distinct difference between racial SLURS and lifestyle slang.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
Lottel
Title: of the Eternal BWOG
Joined: Sep 02 2008
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 10:38 pm Reply with quote Back to top



The only video needed for the subject


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Optimist With Doubts
Title: Titlating
Joined: Dec 17 2007
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 10:49 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Douche McCallister wrote:
There is a distinct difference between racial SLURS and lifestyle slang.


Yes very true but the case that seems to be made in this thread is that we can say what we want because of freedom of speech. That includes slang and slurs. Yes it doesn't seem as serious but if we allow people to say what they want regardless of whether or not it's a lifestyle then where does it end. I mean if you were to ask a bunch of people about what they thought gay meant a good majority if not all would say it meant homosexual. And since it is such a commonly associated term it's easy to see how using it to mean something negative would offend people. Yeah I agree that they could have chosen a better spokesperson but the message is clear, if you say something that offends somebody don't say that thing.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM AddressYahoo Messenger
Ermac
Title: Thread Killer
Joined: Aug 04 2008
Location: Outworld
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 10:58 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Lottel wrote:


The only video needed for the subject


like goldberg and his crew!!



Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
Douche McCallister
Moderator
Title: DOO-SHAY
Joined: Jan 26 2007
Location: Private Areas
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 11:03 pm Reply with quote Back to top

My case is that you can't take a word that originally meant something and then make it mean something else and then get offended that that same word is then used to mean something else. How a group of people of all races can get offended because a word they took and changed was then taken and changed again is being an ultimate hypocrite.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
Optimist With Doubts
Title: Titlating
Joined: Dec 17 2007
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 11:10 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Douche McCallister wrote:
My case is that you can't take a word that originally meant something and then make it mean something else and then get offended that that same word is then used to mean something else. How a group of people of all races can get offended because a word they took and changed was then taken and changed again is being an ultimate hypocrite.

Ok fine, well what if people start to use the word black to mean something bad. I mean black people use that word to represent themselves.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM AddressYahoo Messenger
Douche McCallister
Moderator
Title: DOO-SHAY
Joined: Jan 26 2007
Location: Private Areas
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 11:12 pm Reply with quote Back to top

That falls into racial in my book. Just like if something was considered "White", no one says SHIT when you call someone a nerd, dork, meat head...etc. Granted those words were made up to describe those people, but gay wasn't invented for homosexuals.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
Optimist With Doubts
Title: Titlating
Joined: Dec 17 2007
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 11:33 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Well I think your argument is centered whether or not people are born gay or if it's just a lifestyle that they choose, they aren't gay they are only being gay at this moment and since it's a choice they can't be offended. And whatever I don't want to have that debate. My point is regardless of whether it's a choice or they are born that way if it's a choice.

I'll give another example. It's a fair bet to say people on this forum like to play video games and many people who play games call themselves "gamers". Now let's say someone goes crazy and shoots up a school and he just happened to play games. And on the news the term gamer comes up and they use it to explain the craziness, and then soon enough gamer starts being used interchangeably with people acting crazy. Like if a guy runs headfirst it a car and people say "haha he must of thought he was playing GTA stupid gamer" So do you have the right to be offended because they are taking a term you associate yourself with or can you not be offended because you chose to call yourself that title?


Now I know you might say that it's not the same as gamer didn't mean anything before it was an accepted term but I don't think that's the case because gay is widely accepted as a name for homosexuals. Now if some gay guy just decided to call gay people woodpeckers he doesn't have the right to get mad if woodpecker is used in a negative light because it's not really a widely accepted term and no one but he uses it to mean gay people.

I'm not saying people should feel horrible for saying stuff is gay when they mean lame or dumb. All I'm saying is that some gay people find it offensive to do so and I agree that they have a reason for it.

Now damn it people talk about the golden globes!


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM AddressYahoo Messenger
Ermac
Title: Thread Killer
Joined: Aug 04 2008
Location: Outworld
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 11:36 pm Reply with quote Back to top

every offensive word should now be exchanged to "white", case closed. Time for us to be the butt of the joke for a while.

thats so white
that dude is whiting it up in here
you whited my game up you shithead


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address
GPFontaine
Joined: Dec 06 2007
Location: Connecticut
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 11:37 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Optimist With Doubts wrote:
I'm not saying people should feel horrible for saying stuff is gay when they mean lame or dumb. All I'm saying is that some gay people find it offensive to do so and I agree that they have a reason for it.


Well said.



 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Greg the White
Joined: Apr 09 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Jan 11 2009 11:40 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Douche McCallister wrote:
That falls into racial in my book. Just like if something was considered "White", no one says SHIT when you call someone a nerd, dork, meat head...etc. Granted those words were made up to describe those people, but gay wasn't invented for homosexuals.

It wasn't invented, but it became synonymous with both homosexuals and good mood, because homosexuals were viewed as flamboyant, so they used the term to denigrate them. Think about the origins of how it means "stupid" to you. Did someone mean to say "oh he looks happy" and someone misheard the term as homosexual, so anything happy is now "gay?" No, it's because some little shit looked at something, decided to make himself into a pigheaded prick, and "insult" its masculinity by calling it a derogatory term for a homosexual person. By calling something gay, and making the case for it evolving into stupid is basically calling homosexuality stupid, and furthers an opressed people's position farther from society.

Freedom of speech is there, yes, but think about the impact of your words. Every time a PC-baiting comedian is onstage saying some racist jokes for shock laughs, he's catering to the ignorance of his bigoted viewers. Those viewers will then re-tell the race jokes with no hint of irony, until it is stripped of its good intentions and humor as just a nasty way to make fun of a group of people, inspiring a group of people growing bigger and bigger to become even more ignorant and drag our society into the gutter.


So here's to you Mrs. Robinson. People love you more- oh, nevermind.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: